- Joined
- 4 November 2007
- Posts
- 292
- Reactions
- 0
But the debt already exists, so how is it adding to the problem?Also, to say negative equity has no effect is rediculous, it just adds to our already gargantuan household debt avg for the nation!
But the debt already exists, so how is it adding to the problem?Also, to say negative equity has no effect is rediculous, it just adds to our already gargantuan household debt avg for the nation!
Give up Lancelot. Plenty of people in this thread can't see the difference between investing in shares and property.
What's the alternative - sell your house, turn it into a real loss and then start renting for the rest of your life, geez that's a good investment decision.
Why not? better than going bankrupt, and rent and save to buy the same house or better at half the price in a few years. lol :
Give up Lancelot. Plenty of people in this thread can't see the difference between investing in shares and property.
As you rightly point out, if someone has negative equity THEY DON'T HAVE TO SELL SO THERE IS NO PROBLEM. (Yes typing in capitals is akin to shouting).
What's the alternative - sell your house, turn it into a real loss and then start renting for the rest of your life, geez that's a good investment decision.
But the debt already exists, so how is it adding to the problem?
How so?
What has changed, they had a house and were making repayments, everyone is happy.
They still have a house and are making repayments, but now they pay off even more due to falling IR or they have more money to spend due to falling IR, smiles all round.
Sure, it may be worth less money this week, but it still provides a roof and stability for the family.
Are you clutching at straws NC?
What about the fees, cost of moving, inconvenience, disruption to family life, schooling, etc, some people would be happier to stay put.
knocker - you only go bankrupt if you can't service the debt, not if your house falls in value.
Seriously, to say negative equity has no impact on the housing market is so ludicrous and irrational I am surprised to hear anyone say it.
Because if you have an equity loan, it's the same as a margin loan, it can be called in.What about the fees, cost of moving, inconvenience, disruption to family life, schooling, etc, some people would be happier to stay put.
knocker - you only go bankrupt if you can't service the debt, not if your house falls in value.
Hey u could buy the place next door...the property equivalent of averaging down.
Then rent out by the room to Chinese students, and live in a caravan out the back.
Because if you have an equity loan, it's the same as a margin loan, it can be called in.
It's already happening here in Perth mate!
Can't go bankrupt indeed...
EDIT: Beaten to it by IFocus.
And if I dont have an equity loan?
Who mentioned equity loan anyway, why are you intent on changing the goalposts?
"equity loan"... love it. Technically, any secured loan is an equity loan.Because if you have an equity loan, it's the same as a margin loan, it can be called in.
It's already happening here in Perth mate!
Can't go bankrupt indeed...
EDIT: Beaten to it by IFocus.
Are you really that short sighted?
Your personal situation is only a reflection of the market as a whole. All those who do have equity loans, interest only loans, 105% loans, etc are the ones who have inflated the price beyond sustainability.
When that shoe drops, the ripple effects through the economy as a whole will be immense. This is obvious when looking at the US and UK markets. You might have no equity, you might own your home and IP outright but if you lose your job or your tenant loses theirs then we will see what happens.
hello,
but the article the other day is talking about property only returning 4.5%, so they arent too inflated,
people who talk about sustainability, average income are people who dont have any money or savings, they on the floor pulling average wages,
the bleeding heart crew who would lay a boot into the well off who have built this country
i know i know, but i have plenty in the bank and am renting for peanuts you have to wait wait wait and wait
well done Robots, top effort brother on your hard work
thankyou
robots
hello,
but the article the other day is talking about property only returning 4.5%, so they arent too inflated,
people who talk about sustainability, average income are people who dont have any money or savings, they on the floor pulling average wages,
the bleeding heart crew who would lay a boot into the well off who have built this country
i know i know, but i have plenty in the bank and am renting for peanuts you have to wait wait wait and wait
well done Robots, top effort brother on your hard work
thankyou
robots
Hi robots,
Got a present for you, merry xmas.
Looks very impressive till you note the data comes with a caveat: St Kilda had less than 30 property sales this quarter!
14.08% growth looks very impressive until you consider this is a massive drop (almost 50% drop Year-on-Year) from the 36 month and 24 month growth rates of 25%+.
Warning lights should be flashing robots
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.