This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Has Kevin Rudd misled parliament?

Status
Not open for further replies.
An email affair perpetuated by Turnbull. So are you saying Turnbull started this unfounded saga to allow Rudd to hide behind it? Did I read that correctly?

No, as usual you got it wrong. He is using it to try to divert the heat from him to Turnbull

Caught out doing what exactly?

Lying to Parliament.
 
No, as usual you got it wrong. He is using it to try to divert the heat from him to Turnbull

As my question is clearly wrong, please explain how. I really don't understand. Are you suggesting the Rudd deliberately leaked this false email to Turnbull? How exactly is Rudd diverting heat? Where did you get your information from?



Lying to Parliament.

What was the lie? Where is the proof that either Rudd or Swann lied? Is the proof from the email you assume Rudd is hiding behind?

If that is the case how can one hide behind the very evidence that inciminates?

Again, Caliope, as I am alsways wrong, please set me straight. How much did this car dealer gain from this "help?

You seem to dodge responses better that Turnbull.

cheers,
 
I reckon sending a fake email to the press benefits labor a lot more in this situation (we all remember the fake leaflets put out by Libs during the last election). Are the liberals really that stupid as to send an email that can be verified as a fake with a little effort? You would hope they would have learnt after their last effort.
Turnbull really needs to ball up atm as Labor is turning it around. Either he knows something and is waiting to deliver the killer blow, or he is up the creek.
 
I didn't say you were always wrong Stan, but you seem a bit obtuse today. You obviously haven't kept up with what is going on. Since you seem to have a thirst for guidance this may help;

The Sunday Telegraph today;

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,25664460-5001030,00.html


 
instead of concentrating on the first email....read all about the other emails that did not disappear....and the mention in these emails of John Grant and how representations were made on his behalf to the Treaurer...ie Swan and Ken Henry the head of Treasury dept...
from the insiders program....I watched to see how they would spin it....and slightly surprised they were not covering it up...except they had Gillard on...and I cannot stand to listen to a word she says...

ps note...I usually state whenever there is an extract....but missed one yesterday....and was accused of whatever.....
regular readers will note...there is almost always the word extract or ........denoting...another source etc...and always a ref/link to view the article itself...so there is no question for the reader ..was it my work or an extract from an article............

here is the extract from the insiders.................
and note *** this came straight from the senate enquiry on friday...its on film....so it is not an interpretation or muddied by the program...


The public servant suddenly thrust into the spotlight was Godwin Grech who runs the OzCar scheme and his evidence had all the appearance of man who knew too much, struggling with the truth.

(Excerpt from Senate Estimates hearing):

ERIC ABETZ, LIBERAL SENATOR (reading from email): "Salutation Treasurer, both Godwin Grech and I have spoken to John Grant this evening."

You refer to John Grant, John Grant, John Grant.

GODWIN GRECH, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: When the PMO or the Treasurer's office approach you with something, you give it priority.

ERIC ABETZ (reading from email): "Thanks Godwin, great work. Just so you are aware these emails are also going to the Treasurer's home fax."

GODWIN GRECH: I certainly had the impression that he wasn't your average constituent.

ERIC ABETZ: This relates to whether or not the Treasurer has misled the Parliament.

GODWIN GRECH: It was made clear to me that, you know, it was something that had to be managed and that's what I tried to do.

ERIC ABETZ: Good work. Great work Godwin.

GODWIN GRECH: I'm not going to deny the fact that the case of Mr Grant was...

BARNABY JOYCE, NATIONALS SENATE LEADER: Special.

GODWIN GRANT: Was labour intensive.

BARNABY JOYCE: How do you spell "labour" in that?

ERIC ABETZ (reading from email): "Godwin, we really appreciate this."

Can I ask whether the Prime Minister's office made any representations on behalf of Mr John grant?

DAVID MARTINE, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY: To the best of our ability and we've searched everything we can find, look for, we have not located any correspondence whatsoever, either emails or physical correspondence.

ERIC ABETZ: The answer is quick - yes or no - and we can move on, Chair.

GODWIN GRECH: I am simply not in a position to say anything further to what Mr Martine has said.

ERIC ABETZ: There is of course the suggestion in today's media that such a document exists. Mr Grech, Mr Grech, do those words sound familiar to you?

What about a Mr Charlton, Andrew Charlton?

GODWIN GRECH: I was very frankly distressed this morning when I woke up and read that article.

I'm a public servant and I'm basically in the situation that no public servant should find him or herself in. And within my relationships with...

CHAIR: Sorry Mr Grech...

GODWIN GRECH: No I'll continue, I want to continue. It was very hard this morning going into work and looking my colleagues in the eye. It all came down on my shoulders.

The initial contact I had with respect to John Grant was from the Prime Minister's office.

ERIC ABETZ: Have you seen a document?

GODWIN GRECH: My recollection may well be totally false, faulty, but my recollection, and that's a big qualification, my recollection is that there was a short email from the PMO to me which very simply alerted me to the case of John Grant. But my, my, I don't have the email. We just can't find it.

ERIC ABETZ: Surely Mr Grech has the capacity to answer this question, whether or not the name Andrew Charlton is, rings a bell.

DAVID MARTINE: Senator...

ERIC ABETZ: No, I don't think your name is Mr Grech, sorry. Will you allow him to answer it?

DAVID MARTINE: He is unsure about any correspondence emails or otherwise from the Prime Minister's office to the Treasury.

GODWIN GRECH: I have to defer to the seniority of Mr Martine on that issue.

ERIC ABETZ (reading from email): "Thanks Godwin, great work."

(End of excerpt)

BARRIE CASSIDY, PRESENTER: Well Kevin Rudd has ordered inquiries by the AFP and
http://www.abc.net.au/insiders/content/2009/s2603951.htm
 
I didn't say you were always wrong Stan

No, as usual you got it wrong.

Rereading your above quote, I can see the error of my ways, now. And I thought it was pure semantics?




, but you seem a bit obtuse today.

Possibly. Cos you were nice enough to send me that link, I'll promise to use more smileys to offer 'tone.'

You obviously haven't kept up with what is going on. Since you seem to have a thirst for guidance this may help;

I've been trying. I tend not to read news.com.au and endeavour to find different sources. I do have a thirst for guidance and certainly appreciate yours. Ta.



cheers,
 
I'm a bit behind in this argument, but does it all come back to Steve Lewis?


http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25667020-601,00.html
 
I think it would be more prudent not to jump to anyone's defence here. Looks to be some uncertainty as to what's actually gone on.

And there's no need to be abusive towards any other members to voice your opinion.
Your intervention is appreciated, Kennas. Some members can't help being abusive, sarcastic, etc, it seems. Says more about them than those they are abusing.


Y You also assume that Rudd haters are former Howard supporters. My objections to Rudd are not based on any ideology, but simply on his obnoxious character.
This comment goes for me also.

Ping Pong
 
I would have thought so too. The footage I watched on The 7.30 Report, however, clearly showed this occurring. It is further confirmed in the transcript provided by Kincella.

It's your automatic and passionate defence of the Labor Party which comes across as laughable. You have concluded complete innocence on the part of Rudd and Swan before the whole affair has been played out.
I'd prefer to reserve judgement at this stage.



You seem to have intimate knowledge of all that goes on with the Federal Police, to the level that allows you to be completely certain of their ethics and non-political alignment.
Then you go on to highlight some of their incompetence.

I hope they always conduct their work without fear or favour.
If Howard 'hushed the truth', as you put it, why is it not possible for the current government to do the same?



Pathetic supporters of Howard's decimated Liberal Party eagerly latch onto anything they can, and hurl it at Rudd with vented spleens.
Calliope has appropriately responded to this silly assumption.
Not all of us are philosophically aligned with any particular party.

Yes, here I completely agree. Rudd so far is doing all he can be expected to do. As a result he is looking much more healthy than his friend and colleague, Mr Swan, who may be in a bit of trouble.



We'll see. You may be right. And if the whole chain of emails were to turn out to be manufactured by Turnbull & Co. then he would deserve to be thrown out. I understand, however, that some of these have already been verified as authentic.

But if parliament has indeed been lied to, then Turnbull is correct to draw this to the nation's attention.
 
Here's a good laugh from one who is noted for telling porkies.

The Age today;
© 200
 
"Mr Rudd and Treasurer Wayne Swan both deny allegations of giving Mr Grant preferential treatment in trying to help him gain a government assisted loan."

A member here started a post about his issues with a bank, mortgage broker and his stamp duty grant. He has now called on his MP to look at his case. No offense to the poster in question. I agree that is his right and the MP should look into his case but is this preferential treatment?



cheers,
 
David Martine saved Grech from a fatal serve, and he should be grateful.
If Grech had received instruction from PMO then he would have responded to the PMO with an email or some official communication. To not have it, but nevertheless taint the PMO is sloppy, bordering on incompetent.
The guttersnipes that respond to Rudd on their dislike, rather than evidence, tell the real story: It's just more of the same beat up.

I would concede that Swan may have to tender a better explanation to Parliament if his involvement is greater than initially implied. That said, he is not the first, and will not be the last MP to more diligently represent a constituent than we might come to expect. Guilty of doing his job well! Is something we should welcome from our pol lies.
 
Nothing will come out of this..

They are both in 'checkmate'

so we will wait to see the outcome..
 
The issue is not how he did his job.
It is whether he lied to the Parliament.
 
Nothing will come out of this..

They are both in 'checkmate'

so we will wait to see the outcome..
Your first and third statements contradict each other, Tink.
 
Kennas...I dont believe it all hinges on one missing email...the subsequent emails that were sent to and fro swan and henry and grech tell what really happened...and that was the attempt to provide assistance to the car dealer
...who lives in rudd's electorate...not swans
its all on public record...from the senate hearing last Friday....
watch the insiders .... for the film footage....
at the the heart of the question is....did rudd or swan or anyone lie in parliament about the subject....

it appears they did....
 
Kennas...I dont believe it all hinges on one missing email...the subsequent emails that were sent to and fro swan and henry and grech tell what really happened...and that was the attempt to provide assistance to the car dealer
Some junior analyst at ASIO or DSD is laughing his @rse off at the moment because they have it all. Your next mobile call is recorded somewhere. Every (EVERY) email is stored and can be retrieved at the drop of a hat. Let's see who's team ASIO is on.
 
The guttersnipes that respond to Rudd on their dislike, rather than evidence, tell the real story: It's just more of the same beat up.

And of course Rudd brown-nosers could never be guttersnipes even if they roll
in the gutter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...