This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Has Kevin Rudd misled parliament?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Where's the judicial inquiry?

rederob,
The trolley boy is pushing another empty thought into a parked ute.
Devoid of substance he echoes his leader's now forlorn pleas for some justice: A judicial inquiry no less.
See the points below.

Presently the key reason that Opposition is failing is their inability to fight to their strength - economic management.
Yes a good point.

Opposition strategists know that Hockey is what they need.
No they don't need him as leader. Abbot is the man.
 
ciggys looming fast, wow $20 a pack soon
Yeah and he'll be praised for "doing even more to discourage smoking"...........what a crock, they're just looking at all the politically safe havens to recoup the stupid cash splash

cheers
 
think a lot of his working families also are smoking families...but they have copped the alco pop tax anyway....well the kids have...and they still love him 65%.....rubbish...ask the kids
 
Sorry
I didn't realise the thread was changed to
Dopey wingers that voted Liberal

Please feel free to continue.
You clearly have lost the "misleading" argument and now prefer to find solace in discussing the western world's pre-eminent recession-busting strategist's capacity to lead you in a way that offers considerable joy.
 
Looks like the KRuddster, temporary leader of the good ship "Credit Card" is off the instruct the world on the GFC then he's giving an audience to the Pope, the only good to come out of this will be if the Pope rethinks the ban on birth control after suffering the destructive bull****ting little maggot.
 
Poor old Rederob. He is quite miffed because he came off second best. He made the tactical mistake of basing his whole case on Rudd's veracity which is zero.
And now he feels quite left out.

And what's a "winger" Red, is it some sort of bird...or a footballer?
 
Got to admit rederob you have hit the bullseye yet again. This thread was about Rudd misleading parliament. We had pretty much agreed to diasagree even though we both had valid points and "guilt" was never proved as the email, though fake, has not been attributed to an individual.

The facts are that Grant did receive "special" treatment from the Treasury Dept. Emails and paper trail has proven it. Senate Inquiry concluded nothing other than agreeing that Grant had been assisted by high ranking Treasury officials.

Nothing could be attributed back to Rudd or Swan even though both men had stated in parliament that they had "no knowledge" or made "representations on behalf of an individual". Their story is credible but unlikely.

Like Clinton claimed "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." The definition of sexual relations was put under the microscope. Does receiving a blowjob compared to coital sex make a difference?

SO ... if we want to go off topic and talk about ciggies and our dark skinned cousins being hard done by, let's put it into the "political thread" where we can have a red hot go at each others political leanings.

Thank you for pointing this out to the conjointed masses rederob.
 
Nothing could be attributed back to Rudd or Swan even though both men had stated in parliament that they had "no knowledge" or made "representations on behalf of an individual". Their story is credible but unlikely.
My understanding is that Swan has never denied knowledge of or representation to assist Grant.
 
Anyone else want to have a go? The tips of my fingers have worn off the letters of my keyboard on this subject.

Should have been "No knowledge of the outcome" attributed to Swan EVEN though his home fax was bombarded with info and the head of Treasury was kept in the email loop. Swan must have been asleep not to have known. He was helping his immediate superior (Kevin Rudd) mate to get finance for his car dealership.
 

Burns, back to your ever so boring and repetitive insults.

You should be pleased he will be out of the country. So save your pitiful abuse for when he comes back.

Come to think of it, when Rudd returns why dont you leave the country.
 
It's all yours trainspotter, don't really care if he was caught this time or not, fairly soon everyone will start hating his guts and that will be the end of him
The only thing holding him up at present is the failure of the Libs to attack.
 
Burns, back to your ever so boring and repetitive insults.
You should be pleased he will be out of the country. So save your pitiful abuse for when he comes back.
Come to think of it, when Rudd returns why dont you leave the country.

You'll be pleased to know my opinion of you is much the same as your hero, I think you share the same attributes.

As a matter of fact I'll be off the Hawaii next month, I'm going to change my accent and pretend to be from New Zealand, I'd be horribly embarrassed if anyone had seen Rudd bull****ting on the world stage.
 
Kum Bah Ya My Lord, Kum Bah Ya !

Now lets all hold hands and feel the warmth of the fire we have created.

Macquack, not a bad idea about leaving the country, what with the 200 billion debt and all. The good ship "Credit Card" will be firmly on the rocks loooooonhg after your beloved leader has used his gold travel card for the millionth time at our expense. Wait a minute .. he's doing a damn good job RIGHT FERKING NOW !!!!!!!

Mr Burns ... I look forward to seeing your suntan from lounging around the "Infinity pool" at the Four Seasons Resort Lanai on Big Island. Put a jug of Majhito's on my account. Enjoy. Don't forget the FUSH AND CHUPS !
 
And what's a "winger" Red, is it some sort of bird...or a footballer?
It's someone - much like yourself - that has no substance to an argument, so "wings" it, in the hope the other party is as stupid as the perpetrator.
 
Unless the waves reach the bar I'm safe,

I said I'd be nice didnt I ? Oh well.

Thanks for the tips trainspotter, I'm meeting someone who's been there 20 times so I'll be set.
This time last year I was in Europe, started in London went all the way down to Greece and back up through Switzerland to the UK again, saw the most amazing sights on the planet, then got back to Melbourne where Fed Sqauare is the big attraction, talk about depression setting in.

Anyway I digress, back to the topic.
 
It's someone - much like yourself - that has no substance to an argument, so "wings" it, in the hope the other party is as stupid as the perpetrator.

Never mind. You'll get over it. You just have to accept the fact that you can't be always right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...