- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
SO ... back to the thread of this discussion.
Do I think that parliament was misled. YES. Does rederob and his kind think that Rudd and Swan has reciprocated. YES.
It is a difference of opinion. And in this case a difference of idealogy. Should I roll over and accept this unpalatable situation. NO. Rederob and Macquack and so on and so forth have put their best foot forward. And so have I as well as Calliope and Kincella et al. This is salubrious in it's endeavours to see/feel/hear the whole matrix of the nature of the conundrum.
On the face of written emails and Parliament Senate Comittees dragging out the truth is another matter entirely. I accept that the whole thing in the scheme of things is a furphy to say the least. Amazing how we focus on the trivial and forget the BIG PICTURE. What 200 billion dollar debt? Let's focus on a 1996 $8,000 Mazda ute instead.
Do I think that parliament was misled. YES. Does rederob and his kind think that Rudd and Swan has reciprocated. YES.
It is a difference of opinion. And in this case a difference of idealogy. Should I roll over and accept this unpalatable situation. NO. Rederob and Macquack and so on and so forth have put their best foot forward. And so have I as well as Calliope and Kincella et al. This is salubrious in it's endeavours to see/feel/hear the whole matrix of the nature of the conundrum.
On the face of written emails and Parliament Senate Comittees dragging out the truth is another matter entirely. I accept that the whole thing in the scheme of things is a furphy to say the least. Amazing how we focus on the trivial and forget the BIG PICTURE. What 200 billion dollar debt? Let's focus on a 1996 $8,000 Mazda ute instead.