- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
I don't see what the lefties should be gloating about either. There should be no taxpayer dollars going into bailing out car dealerships.
There are many more deserved things the taxpayers dollars could be spent on.
Couldn't agree more, people are living on the streets and our tax dollars are bailing out car salesmen ? I feel sick.
The banks are safe mainly because they are protected and have huge profitability because well.....they can. No real competition here.
I'm glad Turntable looks less likely to import the now bankrupt de-regulatory ideology of the likes of Goldman Sucks et al. Tickled pink to tell you the truth!
Everyone's been bitching for years about the greedy banks but ironically that's the reason they are strong today........how about that.
No doubt Mr.Burns, but you can thank our regulatory system for not having the slums and tent cities scattered across the country as the result of unfettered lending practices. Oh and also Keating!
Keating isn't he the one living overseas and who calls Australia barbaric ?
The regulatory system has helped and banks have been able to apply some standards to lending becuse they've been swimming in profits anyway.
Just watching 4 Corners how kids are abused and murdered for being "possessed" in Nigeria, bloody awful, we have no problems believe me.
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/
You know as much about our banking system as you knew about this affair; diddly squat. Our banks are strong because of the prudent regulatory regime that they must comply with, not because they rip us off with unjustifiable transaction costs.Everyone's been bitching for years about the greedy banks but ironically that's the reason they are strong today........how about that.
Keating was unique. He did use a lot of colourful adjectives when he was PM.
But there has been no comparable match since IMHO!
Keating isn't he the one living overseas and who calls Australia barbaric ?
The regulatory system has helped and banks have been able to apply some standards to lending becuse they've been swimming in profits anyway.
Just watching 4 Corners how kids are abused and murdered for being "possessed" in Nigeria, bloody awful, we have no problems believe me.
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/
You know as much about our banking system as you knew about this affair; diddly squat. Our banks are strong because of the prudent regulatory regime that they must comply with, not because they rip us off with unjustifiable transaction costs.
I forgot to ask, is the rumour true that you are cloning more feet for yourself, having shot both of your own on so many occasions?
You know as much about our banking system as you knew about this affair; diddly squat. Our banks are strong because of the prudent regulatory regime that they must comply with, not because they rip us off with unjustifiable transaction costs.
He was never voted in, so thats probably in his favor when you look at those who actually were voted in
We are moving off topic, but you need to get acquainted with systemic removals of US banking regulations that significantly opened the gate to the collapse of many of its financial institutions.The US is one of the most heavily regulated as well. It was just that our banks were a bit slow with the program, otherwise we would probably have followed suit. It was probably more dumb luck then anything.
The US is one of the most heavily regulated as well. It was just that our banks were a bit slow with the program, otherwise we would probably have followed suit. It was probably more dumb luck then anything.
You mean like Alexander Downer.
We are moving off topic, but you need to get acquainted with systemic removals of US banking regulations that significantly opened the gate to the collapse of many of its financial institutions.
Mr Burns, this is really unreasonable, isn't it, not to mention being completely off topic? It probably constitutes slander and doesn't contribute anything useful to the discussion. I understand how much you hate Kevin Rudd, but you need to keep some sense of perspective.crimes against truth, crimes against good taste, crimes against earwax, crimes against pigeon toed people who are , I believe taking up a collection to get his gait corrected so they wont be identified with him, crimes against closet homos who marry a rich woman and hide behind her talent and live off her earnings, the crimes are endless............
Both sides have behaved very poorly, mainly by climbing all over honesty, respect, protocol and integrity in their haste to sit on the high horse that enables them to shout ....."You MUST resign!!!".
Turnbull's performance on what has been proven to be a fraudulent email is very unimpressive.....
Yes. That would have saved much humiliation. Good suggestion.Turnbull naturally expected this to be true and it wasn't. he should have said "subject to the production of the email and proof of it's authenticity" Rudd should resign etc etc
Agree entirely.The fact is that Rudd is very tough and seems relatively clean. It would have been foreseeable that attacking Ruddd's fundamental integrity had to be absolutely provable or the counter attack would be ferocious. It's a big call saying the PM is a liar and discovering your evidence has been faked...
The only better example of the failure of democracy is Rudd.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?