Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Guess who gets to help bailout US banks ('oy oy oy')

Joined
31 May 2006
Posts
1,941
Reactions
2
Yep ... here we come to the rescue ... :p:

Geez we're suckers for it aren't we. We're only one of a few idiot countries to buy the whole Iraq war BS ... now Australian taxpayers get to swap quality Australian currency for cr*p US currency. Maybe we should put a 'kick me' sign on the harbour bridge with a US flag next to it.

(to be fair it sounds like most world central banks have stumped up for the task but its still aggravating).


http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/24/news/economy/Fed_global/index.htm?postversion=2008092407

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Federal Reserve Bank announced a deal with four nations Wednesday meant to help global financial markets.

The Fed said it has established reciprocal-currency arrangements with the central banks of Australia, Denmark, Norway and Sweden.

The agreement should make up to $30 billion available to the Fed so it can make loans to banks in the United States. The central banks of Australia and Sweden will provide $10 billion each while institutions in Denmark and Norway will supply $5 billion each.

The U.S. central bank's move to increase liquidity by reaching out to other countries is part of a larger effort to restore some level of confidence to Wall Street, said an economist.

It shows that "the [U.S.] central bank has some depth to it, some ability to respond," said John Silvia, chief economist at Wachovia, adding, "there is a backstop there - the [Fed] is not out there by itself."

The Fed's announcement, made at 1 a.m. ET Wednesday, follows a similar initiative it unveiled last Thursday -- ultimately a $247 billion reciprocal currency arrangement with the European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank, Bank of England, Bank of Canada and Bank of Japan.

The influx of money from the central banks represents an effort to put more money into financial markets and fuel economic activity.

Silvia said that the move does not necessarily mean that the Federal Reserve will use the line of credit immediately but rather that "they are getting ready for the future," said Silvia. "It is similar to what a business would do with a local bank," said Silvia. "[It] establishes that line of credit, which is absolutely essential."

In the current economic climate, with major financial and insurance institutions teetering, commercial banks have tightened their lending policies and increased interest rates, taking billions of dollars out of the economy.

"It is essential that the central banks do stand there and massage the trust back into action," David Buik of the BGC Partners brokerage firm in London said last week. "Without them, we would be in unbelievably uncontrollable turmoil."

Under the plan announced last Thursday, the European Central Bank will kick in up to $110 billion, the Swiss National Bank up to $27 billion, the Bank of Japan up to $60 billion, the Bank of England up to $40 billion and up to $10 billion from the Bank of Canada.
 
The way I interpret this is the Australian reserve bank will swap $30 billion worth off quality Australian dollars that represent a share in a prudently managed economy that is well funded by internal productivity and a strong mineral resource base, in exchange fro $30 billion dollars worth of cr*p currency that currently can't fund its own orifice because if it could they wouldn't need our dollars.

This effectively means an Australian worker in Gundagai gets to help fund a dud mortgage taken out by a no-income-no-job clown from Idaho.

I wonder how the RBA would have reacted if Zimbabwe had asked for a currency swapping arrangement like that?


If there is someone wiser that see's it differently and can explain it that would be greatly appreciated - I'd love to hear that the above interpretation is not the case.
 
Or is it a sign of something to come?

A reverse peg? ;)


Could it work that way? The exchange rate is still unregulated - just looks to me like a bad trade on fundamentals. I guess if the US can do a book build with various central banks to cover close to the full amount of the 700 billion before they go an do their debt issue then it can work that way but its not going to hold for long afterwards imo. It will help to achieve an orderly decline though - I guess its really the only sensible approach - but what does Australia etc. get out of the exercise? (apart from an orderly world economy :rolleyes:).
 
Actually thinking about it more I think you've nailed it with that comment (or pegged it).

Its a book build for the bailout debt issue. And like just about any cap raising for a company thats a turkey the price is going to fall below the issue price after the deals been done. Meanwhile the US will have the funds it needs (if they've done the numbers right) and will coast along fine all cashed up while all the hapless investors (other central banks) struggle to cover the cost of their losing investment. (well thats the negative, cynical view anyway :eek:)
 
Actually thinking about it more I think you've nailed it with that comment (or pegged it).

Its a book build for the bailout debt issue. And like just about any cap raising for a company thats a turkey the price is going to fall below the issue price after the deals been done. Meanwhile the US will have the funds it needs (if they've done the numbers right) and will coast along fine all cashed up while all the hapless investors (other central banks) struggle to cover the cost of their losing investment. (well thats the negative, cynical view anyway :eek:)
:D

I wasn't actually being serious. :eek:

But I think it could actually be like that.

Putting my crazy hat on, it could be an indication of a westernified currency, deliberately devalued to root the Chinese and force them to become importers. Or forcing the rest of the Western world to help out as their own currency goes down the toilet.

Meh, some incoherent ramblings.

Seems like a deliberate long term short on our own currency though...
 
This effectively means an Australian worker in Gundagai gets to help fund a dud mortgage taken out by a no-income-no-job clown from Idaho.

I wonder how the RBA would have reacted if Zimbabwe had asked for a currency swapping arrangement like that?

Sad but true, and it also means that the worker in Gundagai helps cushion the fall of some flash Harry who should have been jumping from a window high above Wall Street by now. :mad:

Zimbabwe? Even more interesting to ponder is how the Fed would have reacted had the boot been on the other foot with a massive financial collapse in Australia. I can just hear it now "well its tough, but you have to let these weak institutions fail", "they must clean up the banking sector", "cull the weak and the reckless - good for the economy" Wasn't that the catch cry when Japan slumped and then again in the '97 Asian crisis. :mad::mad:

Stranger than fiction...
 
banks of Australia ...will provide $10 billion each
population 20 million
what's that about $500 each. (hopefully only a loan of course i.e. and we get it back as AUD rather than USD ;) ).

cheaper than the US bailout , USD 700 billion, (ignoring the money already spent on freddys and fannies etc), 300 million people, about USD 2300 each (man woman child) - slightly longer term loan - assuming if goes through. :confused: :2twocents
 
Top