Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,800
- Reactions
- 10,581
By the process of Gonski's canvassing of the inner thoughts of the Future Fund board members, and his subsequent appointment as Chairman, he should take the moral high ground, and resign.
Gonski, Go.
gg
Agree. He has abused the trust of the board members who engaged with him in good faith during the assessment process.The matter of the Future Fund and the choice of Chairman is troubling to those of us who hold good corporate governance dear.
Corporate governance basically is the good, trusted running of an entity on behalf of it's members.
Mr.Gonski would fulfil this role admirably, in any organisation, from local bowls club to a minor not for profit, and beyond.
His recent appointment to chair the Future Fund is troubling.
It follows his intimate canvassing of the minds of the existing board members/directors, as to who would be best to chair the organisation.
Board members need to be independent and much of this independence is about having ideas separate and privy from all the other members, which coalesce in to a meaningful way forward for the entity.
By the process of Gonski's canvassing of the inner thoughts of the Future Fund board members, and his subsequent appointment as Chairman, he should take the moral high ground, and resign.
Gonski, Go.
gg
Can't help wondering if it was all just another Labor set up.
It was probably a bit naive of Costello to expect those ALP folk to put him in charge of the Future Fund.
What bothers me is the thought of anybody from that side of politics be it Wong, Duck, Julius, Thompson, Garret and the rest, going anywhere near the future fund. The temptation to plunder and waste that bucket of money must be overpowering for that bunch of wasters.
Interesting..... This is what I thought also but what does that say about the Future Fund board???
Former senior Liberal Party figure Nick Minchin has weighed in to the Future Fund furore, saying appointing his former colleague Peter Costello to the chairman's job would have been "most unwise".
But in a letter to The Australian, Mr Minchin says the fund was naive to think the Government "could, would, or even should appoint Peter Costello as chairman".
"The fund must be, and be seen to be, independent, professional, completely above politics and entirely apolitical," Mr Minchin writes.
"Appointing a former politician - even one of the stature of Costello - as chairman, would therefore be most unwise, something Costello himself would understand better than anyone."
Audio: Opposition maintains attack over Future Fund appointment (AM)
The former Liberal senator says while the Government's process has been "utterly shambolic" he believes Mr Gonski is a good choice.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-03-16/robb-blasts-future-fund-appointment/3893384
Against the man who drove Australia's economy into the ground, I would trust a homeless guy on the street to manage the Future Politician's Pensions fund.
Not that I would think you care GG - not being a politician and all.
Wow SCM - if you think Costello drove Australia's economy into the ground, then what do you call the plundering since ALP took over shown so clearly in the chart below? What is there to show for that spending?
And, when it comes to housing to homless people, I don't think labor are much good at that either - unless, it seems, they arrive without papers by boat.
None of the things you mentioned have anything to do with the strength of a nation's economy.
No I suppose it doesn't, but it does reflect on government expenditure and lack of return for that investment.
This in turn results in the government having to increase the tax base, as the current tax base isn't enough to cover expenditure, let alone reduce debt.
Government expenditure in itself (that is in itself) is not related to the strength of the economy.
I would like to see any statistic you have about the return on investment of government spending.
I sure would like to live in the simplistic world you do.
Government expenditure in itself (that is in itself) is not related to the strength of the economy.
That is what I agreed with.
I would like to see any statistic you have about the return on investment of government spending.
Just ask NBNMyths to give you a run down on how much they are going to make on that investment
I sure would like to live in the simplistic world you do.
It is fairly simplistic, if a government spends more than it takes in in taxes and reciepts from government agencies, it runs a deficit.
Which has nothing to do with the strength of the nation's economy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?