tinhat
Pocket Calculator Operator
- Joined
- 1 May 2009
- Posts
- 1,756
- Reactions
- 768
Having just read the article where the author refers to a bull market in gold relative to the Aus $ and Yen, both of those currencies are in current bear markets relative to the US $. Of course that may change. Currencies generally lead, which means if policy seeks a strong US $ rates may follow (assuming that the dollar does weaken), which could change the dynamic.
If the US $ starts to fall and Aus $ and Yen rise, then gold enters a bull market relative to US $ and bear market as against the others.
Essentially (the above), says absolutely nothing of any importance about gold as against the US $. It only makes sense to discuss gold against a consistent currency (whichever one you want), but is usually the US $.
jog on
duc
As stated earlier, if one subscribes to the theory that the price trend of Au and the price trend of AUD are generally correlated, something has to give; the AUD is already out of alignment with the price of Au. Interest rate differentials between different jurisdictions doesn't mean anything any more. Money is becoming worthless. My gut prediction is that gold is not going to retrace far and will rise in the medium term, commodity prices are going to rise over 2020 calendar year and the AUD will be up against the USD.
It also depends on what time scales you are working to for your comments and I am not sure that most people would regard a 6-year lull in gold's ascent - ie 2013 to 2019 - a bull market.On a simply chart basis, we are still at an unknown point. It cannot be confirmed that the bull that started in 2001 +/- is now continuing and it cannot be denied either. The point is moot.
I am on board with all your points - for now.As stated earlier, if one subscribes to the theory that the price trend of Au and the price trend of AUD are generally correlated, something has to give; the AUD is already out of alignment with the price of Au. Interest rate differentials between different jurisdictions doesn't mean anything any more. Money is becoming worthless. My gut prediction is that gold is not going to retrace far and will rise in the medium term, commodity prices are going to rise over 2020 calendar year and the AUD will be up against the USD.
Well this might happen sooner rather than later.My view is $1650 this year is a very likely outcome and a spurt to $1800 with a bumpy retrace cannot be ruled out given gold's momentum. It just needs some convergence of nasty short-term geopolitical events to kick it off, eg. more oil refinery/tanker disruptions in the Middle East.
It also depends on what time scales you are working to for your comments and I am not sure that most people would regard a 6-year lull in gold's ascent - ie 2013 to 2019 - a bull market.
On the other hand at a greater time scale the underpinning of gold's value is tied to US debt levels and the fact is that many people now regard its debt as unsustainable:
I suspect most at ASF work to time scales of less than 5 years for their investment decision and am happy to be corrected.
In that light I for one am looking at the most likely scenarios that will move POG this year and next, as I believe that the hedge books of equities can see POG rise well after its practical use-by date (in other words the indicators can turn negative and remain negative for the next year before POG declines significantly).
I am on board with all your points - for now.
I will repeat the point I made previously about correlations in that they are post-fact. To make money from a strong correlation you must know the direction of the lead indicator. In the short term POG and the $USD are more positively correlated than POG and the $AUD. Both are heading for rate cuts. The short term likelihood for POG to continue rising seems much better than the chance it will decline meaningfully. The next question then relates to follow-through. And that is largely predicated on the global economy which we all can see as currently in relatively poor shape. So where @ducati916 and I differ relates to what we regard as "moot."
Versus:Some facts:
1980 - Q1 2003 (22 years) US debt compounded at 9.57% (Gold went into a bear market).
2003 - Q4 2019 (16 years) US debt compounded at 8.17% (Gold in a bull market).
View attachment 99428
So Gold is not correlated (on those figures) to US debt at all.
Versus:
Not my correlation so I cannot check, but the correlation is definitely positive over the period and you do not need numbers to see that.Ok, I would be interested to see the calculation of the correlation coefficient on the actual price data because it is a mathematical function of the data that it is positive for a positive connection (as one quantity increases, so does the other) and a calculation can demonstrate whether the connection is significant.
The chart claims 90%. That looks incorrect.
This just tells us there is a low probability of making a trade that goes completely sour if you have the stomach to keep your investment through the bad times.Is it any use as a 'trading signal'? I would say yes, as long as you are operating in a lifetime sort of trade.
That's what happens when people start shooting missiles.Big moves in gold price in the last 24 hours.
$2,230.63
+$45.36
+2.08%
Gold goes on a rocket rideThat's what happens when people start shooting missiles.
If I had bought into Newcrest mining at under $2 in the 1990s when I first began to trade shares I would be very happy today.2. Based purely on that chart, you cannot be in a 'trade'. What you can do however is use gold as an insurance policy as against fiat currencies (which is pretty much what I do). If you are using trading capital and were sitting in gold 1980 - 2002 you would not have been a happy camper. The opportunity lost costs were simply too high.
Again that is not true as had I bought into Ramelius in 2013 at 20cents I would be a very happy camper today.Even the mid 2011 to 2016 period would have been a tough one, assuming a late entry (into a drawdown period).
If I had bought into Newcrest mining at under $2 in the 1990s when I first began to trade shares I would be very happy today.
Again that is not true as had I bought into Ramelius in 2013 at 20cents I would be a very happy camper today.
Timing the markets can be everything to traders but to investors the corollary is time in.
I won't go down sidetracks but just remind you that few sectors of industry are immune from going down the gurgler or being taken over.My question would be, if we are now discussing Gold Mining companies: what on aggregate, befell the entire cohort at the relevant times? I suspect there are more dead bodies than success stories.
That's a fair comment, so how many of your shares have appreciated more than 200% in the past 5 years?Whilst I appreciate the bullishness of gold at present and the ability to trade it, I can't fathom having a large % of my portfolio as a 'buy and hold' long term position
As this is a forum for mostly trading equities my basis for purchasing a gold stock to "hold" is based foremost on it being a producer with a reserve/resource base that will see it through no less than the next 5 years at an ASIC substantially lower than spot.The response that I was expecting (as it is the rational one) is: well what drives interest rates? That would be your inflationary argument. It is producer inflation rather than consumer inflation. Commodities measure producer inflation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?