- Joined
- 2 October 2006
- Posts
- 3,043
- Reactions
- 2
what's wrong with you AGENTM ? why do you insist on running people and companies down when you hold no shares in them.
it doesnt matter wether you dont like the management or the operrator.........it's all about making money............
not getting personal with others
lighten up please
lol
ohh no!! stalker mick is back..
lighten up.. lol you cant even read a light hearted comment and understand it,, you seem to be the most uptight person on this site..
the light hearted comment by me has only been taken the wrong way by you mick.. which shows how frustrated a person you have become..
everyone is making a killing on GDN Mick.. have a look at the shares progression during the last months.. no ones uptight about it,, the well has got a background reading and people are making a fortune out of the hype,, its brilliant stuff run by a brilliant crew.. you have to enjoy it Mick..
again Mick,, you appear to think you are my father or something, trying to tell me what i should say think and do.. i will put you on ignore here as well, as your contributions to any topic are nonsense at best and you seem to think your exclusive role in life is to tell me how to act.. who the hell are you to tell me what i can and cant write on a forum?
your a complete fool.. you don't know whether i am in or out af a share of what my position is mick, and you would be the last to know in any case..
onto ignore you go mick.. !!
guys, this has been the best forum for objective info on this stock by a mile..pls don't let it turn into hc. Stock comment only please, we all waste enough time on other sites dredging through crap.
"People are entitled to take a bullish or bearish view as long as they can back up their argument with some analysis or pertinent information. Whether or not they are a holder is largely irrelevant. Someone is only ramping or downramping if they are bullish or bearish without providing any reasoning for their point of view."
Good onya Joe.
looks like I missed all the action today lol
Probably a good thing
ASX ANN
SP GDN 0.20 -0.005 -2.44% 5,110,980 shares $1,019,628 @ 15-May 11:07:21 AM
http://www.asx.com.au/asx/statistics/displayAnnouncement.do?display=pdf&idsId=00953342
15-05-2009 10:13 AM GDN General Update - Paradox Basin
UPDATE – 15 MAY 2009
Paradox Basin #2 Grand County Utah
Paradox Basin #2 is at 13,030’ the bit was replaced for a PDC bit after drilling out the shoe.
Progress has been slower than expected mainly due to the extra bit trip.
It is expected that the well will test the Barker Creek Formation over the weekend.
Remaining targets are the Barker Creek, Alkali Gulch, and Pinkerton Trail formations and Mississippian Leadville Limestone.
Golden State Resources is currently liaising with various specialists to discuss the completion of the upper gas zones in Paradox Basin #2.
No one would drill out the shoe with a PDC bit, so whats the big deal about the extra bit trip, are GDN being taken for a ride again???? Watch your stop loss.
Dazt
They can apply for as many permits to drill as they want. The only condition is they spud each one within a year from the approval date (State approval). Unsure what BLM (Federal approval) will require for each new well (outside of what they have already supplied for PB#2, paleo, Indian, flora, fauna etc). Permitting time frame should be short, similar to other companies multi permitting drill programs.
Regards PB#1, in my opinion they are waiting for as much option conversion money they can get. If all options convert they get $3 million 22th May and $40 million 30th June. The success of PB#2 will determine if they get into the money. Personally I think they will 'one way or another'. Thats a huge amount of cash not to be let go down the gurgalar.
If they get a reasonable amount of that cash in they can work over PB#1 and expand drill plans for another 2 to 3 wells, all depends on PB#2 outcome. PB#2 of course is looking nice but in the end its about getting good gas flowA no brainer really.
Rick De Boer needs to expand on that 'work over' of PB#1. Information is limited on their plans. One Q (pilots may be able to answer this) but would it be better to enter PB#1 againand side track lower sections again on the basis that the company has declared that salt intrusion has damaged the lower integrity of the well? Most likely cheaper option.
Cheers
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?