- Joined
- 10 December 2012
- Posts
- 3,632
- Reactions
- 9
Doctor's can choose who to treat if they are in private practise and not being paid by the taxpayer, just as patients can choose only to be treated by a particular doctor and not others if they pay for the services.
If a cake shop won't produce a wedding cake for gay people, there are plenty of other cake shops around.
The homosexual lobby wants everyone to submit to its agenda, and they are more than happy to use the force of law to achieve their aims. They want all dissent crushed
.
Freedom of conscience,
freedom of speech
and religious freedom are all being trampled
Actually uhmm no !
But go read what he said.
Try check out Matthew 9 v 1-12
But look I don't think you are a man who cares much about Jesus anyway and that's fine.
Why should I have the LGBT activist dogmatic terrorist force their non-religious dogmas onto me?
If a cake shop won't produce a wedding cake for gay people, there are plenty of other cake shops around.
and I have proved the point.
They are both the same in their approach.
Why should I have the LGBT activist dogmatic terrorist force their non-religious dogmas onto me?
So it would make sense to have a society where the people can discriminate against each other?
You'd not have an issue with a Muslim man refusing to serve a woman, or a Catholic standing by while a divorcee needs urgent medical help? Would it be OK for a staunchly religious person to walk past a gay man laying in the gutter from being bashed, since they'd see what happened to the person as God's will and punishment?
Where does common decency amongst people factor into things?
Others should have the right to boycott the doctor if his views don't match their own.
Watch and wait what happens, then you will see.
For me it's about dilution of the value of my marriage and the dilution of a principle that should be held sacrosanct.
Nothing wrong with civil unions, between humans and animals if they so wish, I don't even give a damn about 1 woman having a civil union with ten other women and 3 men and a blue whale. Give these unions the same rights, don't allow any form of discrimination.
But get your hands of the value of my marriage and its single meaning and the legacy of it that I want to pass down to my kids. Don't go teaching my children your views, because I care about my bloodline, it's good name and its survival down the generation. Don't go degrading my morals and my beliefs. I won't interfere in yours you leave mine alone. Go get your own name for your definition of your same sex unions and f-off from mine.
Marriage is between a single man and a single woman, always has been, always will be. No descendant of mine will ever be taught different.
If the filthy rich lobby (probably the majority of gays who have no stress due to no family life and plenty of income due to no children) managed to get laws changed in another patently stupid country that's their problem America is a parasite anyway, which by the way if you read the opinion of the dissenting judges you see that Americans took their constitution and just threw it away into the dirt pile of being able to be changed by judges when this was only to be possible by the people.
Get your own name for your own particular sex Union. Don't come attacking us for ours. Have some decency and respect what is ours.
My marriage is a symbol for ever, to be handed down as an inheritance to my descendants, that they will be happy and our family will continue as a family supporting one another, united and not divided, if they follow my example then we can pass down the riches we accumulate to tide us over against future rascals and governments who wish to steal what my family creates. If amongst them perchance a gay member of family is born, they will be loved but their line will not prosper. It is about my right to say that in my family, the men shall only marry women and the women shall only marry men. It is about being true and owing justice to the creator who in creation instituted it naturally to be so. I will not let it be otherwise.
Keep your hands off our marriages! Get your own word for it.
Call it Gayrriage and go be happy I won't bother you. You can even put it into the constitution for all I care. I want it distinct from my values.
???You know absolutely f all about life until you have married a woman, had several children your wife gave birth to in front of your eyes and nursed with her own breasts and raised till they are at least 30. It's easy to mix some powder in a bottle and throw it in a babies mouth and pretend you are a good mom if you can breastfeed and don't.
But when it comes to knowing about life, sweetheart, I think your kids probably have a lot to teach you.
“A prude is a person who thinks that his own rules of propriety are natural laws.”
and
“Being a mother is an attitude, not a biological relation.”
― Robert A. Heinlein
But look I don't think you are a man who cares much about Jesus anyway and that's fine
I have found Steve Rogers to be a more inspiring figure than Jesus, he saved the world by selflessly crashing a plane full of nuclear weapons into the arctic ice cap, where he lay frozen for 60 years. He later went on to defeat Hydra again.
Sure Jesus turned some water into wine that sounds like a party trick, and they say he died on the cross for us, but he woke up 3 days later, Steve Rogers crashed a plane into ice for us and he didn't wake up for 60 years.
Jesus also said slaves obey your masters, Steve Rogers stands for freedom.
for an issue that doesnt matter, sure is a lot of discussion
a day or so ago, but MANY pages, a poster wondered whether younger people had a different attitude.
prompted me to ask my 3 sons aged 18-25 what their peers thought.
they agreed ~99% of their peers are in support, as are they.
They said the few dissenters were strong Christians, (or Muslims) BUT even they were
considered to be not fervently against.
As they sometimes use terms such as "fkn gay faggot", they are not what you would call 100% politically correct cleanskins either
My wife pointed out that this is an issue that mainly affects younger people, as they get married, but I added that older people such as me dont give a toss what other people think anyway
I predict the Libs are going to get well-and-truely jammed on this issue
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?