There is certainly anecdotal evidence amongst my homosexual friends, family members and acquaintances .
Am I the only one that doubts he actually has gay friends.:
Unless as I suspected a while back Tisme is one of those self hating closet gay men, who is out to publically oppose all things gay so as to misdirect attention from his inner struggle.
So you take the piss out of gays to bolster your arguments when you deem fit?
?
I would suggest I am better qualified than you if you labour under the misconception that people with opinions about anything different to you must be distant from attachments.
snapshot sunshine: gay niece, gay nephew, two gay friends I play pool with down the pub, numerous gay friends in gay central Port Hedland. Helped a gay 50 yearold client friend declare his persuasion back in 1987 Brisbane when it was not a great idea and not only that helped him move to his lover in Sydney.
No I was taking the piss out of you.
You sound like a great friend, smiling to their face taking smack behind their back, or I guess you could just be lying.
I don't talk behind people's back and I don't PM members with defamatory content about members in a rally call support either.
]
What are you talking about? Are you trying to say I have sent someone a pm about you?
Are you saying these "gay friends" know the horrid opinions you have of them? And you talk openly with them about the disgust you feel as you do here?
You have just proved my argument that the objects of attention (gay men) are more likely to want sex, ie are more promiscuous.
Thanks for that.
QED.
Men, in general, have high demand for sex. They'd screw anything and anyone. This include gay men.
I am an open book cobber = WYSIWYG..
I'm guessing you have to pussy foot around your gay cohorts, which is no way to treat a real friend is it...real friends weigh the good with the bad, comfort levels, etc.
Put it in economics term, it's supply and demand.
Men, in general, have high demand for sex. They'd screw anything and anyone. This include gay men.
.
Yep, its an evolution thing.
Through our evolutionary history, its been in the interest of the male to have as much sex with as many partners as possible, after all male can have 1000's of children in his life and leave the females to care for them, using the "shotgun approach" he is guaranteed to have a certain percentage to survive with good genes.
However female human can have relatively few children, so its in her interests to be selective with whom she mates, and select a partner with good genes whom is also going to be loyal and stay around and protect and provide for her few offspring.
the females hopes of spreading her genes are limited to the handful of children she can personally raise, she must make sure they have good genes and are protected, so is naturally going to be very selective.
A male can be less selective, because he has not limits to the number of children, he is not making a large commitment, he can impregnate and then move on.
--------------------------------
This is our evolutionary history, I am not making any statements about how we should structure our lives now.
You are attempting to explain the facts , which is that gay males have more sexual partners than straight males ?
Do you deny this ?
Whatever the reasons for it the premise is true.
Yep, its an evolution thing.
Through our evolutionary history, its been in the interest of the male to have as much sex with as many partners as possible, after all male can have 1000's of children in his life and leave the females to care for them, using the "shotgun approach" he is guaranteed to have a certain percentage to survive with good genes.
However female human can have relatively few children, so its in her interests to be selective with whom she mates, and select a partner with good genes whom is also going to be loyal and stay around and protect and provide for her few offspring.
the females hopes of spreading her genes are limited to the handful of children she can personally raise, she must make sure they have good genes and are protected, so is naturally going to be very selective.
A male can be less selective, because he has not limits to the number of children, he is not making a large commitment, he can impregnate and then move on.
--------------------------------
This is our evolutionary history, I am not making any statements about how we should structure our lives now.
So you are happy to have this description applied to yourself ?
Does your wife know what you get up to behind her back, or someone else's ?
Marriage as a promise, a contract, agreement, understanding, commitment or whatever between two people is just that, no more, no less. And it is the business of the particular couple and no one elses business.
Half traditional marriages break up, again its their right and thier own business. And if you are gay, straight, upright or crooked, if its between two people its no one elses business. Anyone who says we should or should not do this or that (regardless of beliefs from heaven or fairyland) are interfearing full stop.
So we need to get over the crapola and our politicians need to do what they are paid to do and put it up for a vote on the democratic floor of our Parliament and see if the votes are there to create a law for same sex marriage or not. These minor, in my view, distractions are taking the communities minds away from the real problems we have with, jobs, education, affordable homes for all and a level tax playing field adinfanitum.
The majority want a plebiscite ...FULL STOP....The fear of losing is in the Green Labor Party camp and they are not prepared to accept it.
Absolute rubbish, I could not care one way or the other. But I very much do care about the huge amount of money the plebesite would waste over such a small issue when it could be dealt with in a flash on the floor of the Parliament by the people, that the peope put there, to get on with the job and make DECISIONS NOCO
And what majority, who's and what figures. And the press don't rule the roost either
Absolute rubbish, I could not care one way or the other. But I very much do care about the huge amount of money the plebesite would waste over such a small issue when it could be dealt with in a flash on the floor of the Parliament by the people, that the peope put there, to get on with the job and make DECISIONS NOCO
And what majority, who's and what figures. And the press don't rule the roost either
So straight men are heck out of luck - hence they have less sexual partners; have less sexual encounters.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?