- Joined
- 31 December 2008
- Posts
- 236
- Reactions
- 0
Seems like everything you say appears to be coming true...
Seems like everything you say appears to be coming true...
If the EA is that good, could you run it on a demo account and enter trades manually into a live account with a decent broker?
Of course. Not the reason you want to use an EA if you are doing it manually though. Anyone can trade the range.
Then do it, and don't worry about the EA. Or create your own EA which won't suffer the same fate. Why waste energy on an idea that has too many external factors to derail it?
Making a living in the markets is certainly possible - there's many of us here. But I don't know anyone who does it by deploying a strategy who knows how many others are also using.
"25,000 people are running FAP apparently..."
At $200 ea I know who is making the most out of this EA. $5 mill to the developers and the only expenses involve creating a few websites and promoting the heck out of the EA with both good and bad publicity.
This EA has been a staggering marketing success which relied on the viral spread of information throughout the world's trading forums. The Aussie expression "come in spinner" is such an understatement.
You obviously are a mechanical trader MS and Tradesim user I presume.
So I presume you like the idea of an EA?
Well, mechanical to me means objectively defined entry, exit and MM criteria. This may or may not be automated. I have never run a robot or EA yet but I probably will in the future.
However, I don't believe success comes from using someone else's creation, especially if it is widely available.
Have you looked at a company called Home Trader before? (not spamming)
They use Mecahnical Systems to trade equities designed using MS and Tradesim initially. Now they have moved to Amibroker.
I know of Hometrader. There are several threads here relating to them. I can see they would be of use to people who are prepared to pay others to learn about system research and development. Given the cost I would suggest a better use of that amount of money would be to buy the relevant software, a bunch of books about system development and some quality data - if mechanical system trading is what someone wants to do. I freely grant that a very good discretionary trader can do extremely well. However, my personality is suited to mechanical so that's what I do.
There is no way the average person could program and backtest a system using either of those pieces of sofware without first going through a huge learning curve.
They are professionals at what they do and have spent alot of time and money developing the systems. Making use of a professional requires capital.
People who require others to do the work for them will never truly succeed. This is the breeding ground for victim mentality. If things go wrong, the individual will not take responsibility, preferring instead to blame some arbitrary external factor.
"I wasn't shown how to do that."
"The market is against me."
"That fund manager lost all my money."
"I can't be bothered to learn what I should know."
"I can't be bothered putting in the time to develop myself."
Some of their customers will move beyond this and learn about what it takes. I would hazard a guess that those same people didn't need the "pros" in the first place.
MT4 doesn't support ECN brokers out of the box - you have to find ECN brokers which offer a plug in. And you'll probably have problems finding one because an ECN offering MT4 is like an Arab airline offering Kosher meals.
Do you know of any Providers who provide MT4 with STP who don't take the other side, who pass all orders into Interbank Markets. Who only make money from commissions and could not care if you lose or win money?
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.