It would appear that the takeover terms make acceptances by the Directors and those party to it, irrevocable. But Flannery is a shrewd cookie. He knows that the Authorities have to approve it, and if counterbids arrive, they may say that in the interests of National and Port security, these bids must be given a fair airing.
If one of them is acceptable to the Shareholders excluding the Directors' group, then the Directors must recommend it.
What odds they have been given the nod and wink already, which enabled them to commit to the deal?
This no doubt explains why the press commentators don't think this is a done deal, and that we might see $24 as a possible final price.
The Authorities are obviously sensitive to Chinese Companies coming in and buying up chunks of the National Assets, and now perhaps fancy giving China a bloody nose after the way they behaved in the Rio saga.
A pity the likes of Xstrata and Vale could not have seriously entered the fray earlier?
I would rather be talking to Rio, or London than Beijing, with my subsequent shareholding.
If one of them is acceptable to the Shareholders excluding the Directors' group, then the Directors must recommend it.
What odds they have been given the nod and wink already, which enabled them to commit to the deal?
This no doubt explains why the press commentators don't think this is a done deal, and that we might see $24 as a possible final price.
The Authorities are obviously sensitive to Chinese Companies coming in and buying up chunks of the National Assets, and now perhaps fancy giving China a bloody nose after the way they behaved in the Rio saga.
A pity the likes of Xstrata and Vale could not have seriously entered the fray earlier?
I would rather be talking to Rio, or London than Beijing, with my subsequent shareholding.