doctorj
Hatchet Moderator
- Joined
- 3 January 2005
- Posts
- 3,271
- Reactions
- 8
Remember this is where fact begins to blur with speculation.So what is Baker McKenzie's role? Why does someone want to obscure the ownership of the stake? Why are both Citi and ML involved?
You'll have to forgive the length of this post (Edit: I'm going to split them up on second thought). Amongst all the rambling, I hope you manage to learn something. Much of the Tullow-research noted in this post was completed by a chap named Barry, so to you (I'm sure you read this), thanks.
First of all, you'll see on the attached chart the interest kicked in on Friday, followed by an aftermarket 603 (substantial holder) notice released by an english law firm called Baker and McKenzie. The announcement specifies the shares are owned by an english fund called evolution and held by Merrill Lynch.
This spurred a lot of interest on Monday (nearly 2x the 200d average volume) for a couple of reasons. 1) It is the first substantial holder in FAR and 2) the purchase history provided in the form shows that the firm has been purchasing aggressively for a number of months. Subsequent analysis of the course of sales suggests that on some days they accounted for >80% of the daily volume.
Citi and ML also the investo in ELK, what do you think? they are going to merge the two oil company? How much chance are there?
Some time on Monday afternoon, another substantial shareholder announcement was made - this time by Citibank. The holder was announced to be Citicorp nominees. Tuesday was exciting again, with a break of resistance and 2.5x the long term average volume, on face value, because of a second substantial holder in the space of a couple of days.
This is where it gets a little weird and fact begins to blur into suspicion.
Closer inspection of the substantial holder notice revealed they were for exactly the same number of shares. It's unlikely that two different owners of shares both became substantial holders of shares within days, so why two notices, from two different parties showing the same shares owned by two different parties?
Calls to Citi/ML revealed they were for the same stake and they had received a legal opinion that they should re-release the 603 and Baker McKenzie made a mistake. So what is Baker McKenzie's role? Why does someone want to obscure the ownership of the stake? Why are both Citi and ML involved?
Stay tuned...
Highly unlikely that the transactions are related in the way you suggest. If FAR is the target of a takeover, it'll be from another oiler interested or active in the horn region of Africa, not from a fund. I don't know much about Elk, but unless they have significant interests in Africa, its unlikely they're related.Citigroup Global Markets Australia Holdings Pty Limited and Evolution Master Fund Ltd are also the two investo in ELK. Is it a coincidence of are they going to merge the two company or some other big company want to buy the ELK and FAR at the same time? Is it possible? How likely?
FARG are convertible notes. Pay about 10% from memory and were issued to fund the acquisition of the Senegal acerage.Just a quick question. What is FARG stand for? I do not understand, is it a share or option or something else?
My advice is that its a friendly placement, most likely to "sophisticated investors" (not a ramp - up or down, it's in a halt at the moment and will come to market before comes out of halt). It makes sense to raise cash in the lead up to EP104, while its strong, but personally feel that a placement at 14-15c is cheap when a placement at 17-20c could possibly have been achieved in a few weeks as speculation builds in the lead up to canning drilling.Uh oh. Trading halt just announced. I hope it's not the dreaded take-over just yet, but rather some further oil discoveries.
I can tell by your avatar and nic, rub me. LOL.A placement to 'sophisticated' investors it is: at 14 cents. I'm sophisticated. I'm an investor. So why didn't I get any
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?