Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

FAR - FAR Limited

Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

So what is Baker McKenzie's role? Why does someone want to obscure the ownership of the stake? Why are both Citi and ML involved?
Remember this is where fact begins to blur with speculation.

Back in April, FAR MD Michael Evans announced in Resource Stocks mag that his aim was to replicate Hardman in being bought out as a result of their African acreage. It so happens that Baker McKenzie was one of the top legal advisers on M&A in Australia and the UK-based firm promotes heavily in the oil/gas market. Also, Merrill Lynch was the bank acting on behalf of Tullow in their T/O of HDR. So the conclusion I have come to (and looking at the market, so have others) is that someone's making a move on FAR or atleast building up a strategic stake in preparation for one. They would have motive to obscure the ownership through nominees and different brokers to reduce takeover speculation and make the eventual move cheaper. Essentially Baker McKenzie stuffed up by releasing the 603 - it should never have seen the light of day.

It may not be Tullow either. The likes of Dana (Tullow's partner in a neighbouring block) or BG who both were rumoured to be sniffing around HDR and missed out. Dana have also done a stack of work on large oil accumulation in a block in the south of the basin.

So what do "they" get for the $60mill odd it would cost to buy FAR at the moment?

The Senegal acreage is in the same basin as Hardman and the blocks (FAR 30%) had previously had 1bbo (1 billion barrels) of oil defined by Shell in the 70s by 2d seismic. FAR have just completed advanced 3d seismic over many of the larger targets and are in the process of generating drilling targets. Based on comparable blocks in the area that have completed 3d seismic and have a 2-3 200MBO+ recoverable targets mapped, you could argue a valuation of $500M for the Senegal blocks. In the last round, similar blocks went for ~$1b signing bonus only which would value FAR's 30% stake in the block at least at $300M.

They also have a 5% in the Beibu Gulf project with the likes of ROC, PSA & HZN which will be developed in the next year. This will most likely reduce to 2.5% stake when CNOOC exercise their option to farm in, but even then and using ROC's typically conservative figures for oil recoverable, it's not too hard to arrive at a valuation of $20M.

So, starting with a $60M cap, take out $20M for Beibu $10M for the cash balances. Their producing assets bring in about $4Mpa (worth $20M on a PE of 5), leaving just $10M for their acreage at South Gross Tette, all of the Suncor Canada acreage, Waller, Eagle and their drilling in Arc's EP104 next month, worth up to a combined $0.59cps if successful ($230M) to FAR as per the latest StockAnalysis report by Peter Strachan.

Essentially, this leaves a value of 0 for EV and Senegal - to my mind they're getting a bargain.

This is all speculation. As YT has found out, there are many companies out there where you can argue that it should be worth much more. Whether or not that happens is another thing. Whether or not FAR realises much of that value now or not is up to Mr Market to decide, but for the moment, the significant holder notice and takeover speculation has set things on their way.

Technically we're seeing a break of the triangle with a gap up and about 9-10x the long term average volume. Close today was a little unconvincing, but course of sales shows the sell down was on very small volume. EW suggests it seems to have traced out ABC and is now beginning a wave 1 and a larger order wave 3. I make out the target for the break of the triangle to be about 18.5, but with large numbers of stale holders from the May 06 highs, I think that might be tough in the near term.

Disc: I own a stack of FAR shares.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

You'll have to forgive the length of this post (Edit: I'm going to split them up on second thought). Amongst all the rambling, I hope you manage to learn something. Much of the Tullow-research noted in this post was completed by a chap named Barry, so to you (I'm sure you read this), thanks.

First of all, you'll see on the attached chart the interest kicked in on Friday, followed by an aftermarket 603 (substantial holder) notice released by an english law firm called Baker and McKenzie. The announcement specifies the shares are owned by an english fund called evolution and held by Merrill Lynch.

This spurred a lot of interest on Monday (nearly 2x the 200d average volume) for a couple of reasons. 1) It is the first substantial holder in FAR and 2) the purchase history provided in the form shows that the firm has been purchasing aggressively for a number of months. Subsequent analysis of the course of sales suggests that on some days they accounted for >80% of the daily volume.
Citi and ML also the investo in ELK, what do you think? they are going to merge the two oil company? How much chance are there?
Some time on Monday afternoon, another substantial shareholder announcement was made - this time by Citibank. The holder was announced to be Citicorp nominees. Tuesday was exciting again, with a break of resistance and 2.5x the long term average volume, on face value, because of a second substantial holder in the space of a couple of days.

This is where it gets a little weird and fact begins to blur into suspicion.

Closer inspection of the substantial holder notice revealed they were for exactly the same number of shares. It's unlikely that two different owners of shares both became substantial holders of shares within days, so why two notices, from two different parties showing the same shares owned by two different parties?

Calls to Citi/ML revealed they were for the same stake and they had received a legal opinion that they should re-release the 603 and Baker McKenzie made a mistake. So what is Baker McKenzie's role? Why does someone want to obscure the ownership of the stake? Why are both Citi and ML involved?

Stay tuned...

"First of all, you'll see on the attached chart the interest kicked in on Friday, followed by an aftermarket 603 (substantial holder) notice released by an english law firm called Baker and McKenzie. The announcement specifies the shares are owned by an english fund called evolution and held by Merrill Lynch."
Doctorj May I ask where did you get the name of Baker and Mckenzie? I did not find their name in the announcement.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Citigroup Global Markets Australia Holdings Pty Limited and Evolution Master Fund Ltd are also the two investo in ELK. Is it a coincidence of are they going to merge the two company or some other big company want to buy the ELK and FAR at the same time? Is it possible? How likely?
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

The letterhead of the first of the substantial holder announcements was for the legal firm Baker & McKenzie.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Citigroup Global Markets Australia Holdings Pty Limited and Evolution Master Fund Ltd are also the two investo in ELK. Is it a coincidence of are they going to merge the two company or some other big company want to buy the ELK and FAR at the same time? Is it possible? How likely?
Highly unlikely that the transactions are related in the way you suggest. If FAR is the target of a takeover, it'll be from another oiler interested or active in the horn region of Africa, not from a fund. I don't know much about Elk, but unless they have significant interests in Africa, its unlikely they're related.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

It looked like it was going on a run today, but was stopped in its tracks by big sellers selling into the temprorary strength. Looks like this will need substantial volume to get past the 16 cents for starters.
Only been holding this for about 6 weeks for the long term prospects of the Senegal block they have. At least I won't have to wait as long as some of the patient holders on this forum :D
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Uh oh. Trading halt just announced. I hope it's not the dreaded take-over just yet, but rather some further oil discoveries.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Just a quick question. What is FARG stand for? I do not understand, is it a share or option or something else?
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Just a quick question. What is FARG stand for? I do not understand, is it a share or option or something else?
FARG are convertible notes. Pay about 10% from memory and were issued to fund the acquisition of the Senegal acerage.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Uh oh. Trading halt just announced. I hope it's not the dreaded take-over just yet, but rather some further oil discoveries.
My advice is that its a friendly placement, most likely to "sophisticated investors" (not a ramp - up or down, it's in a halt at the moment and will come to market before comes out of halt). It makes sense to raise cash in the lead up to EP104, while its strong, but personally feel that a placement at 14-15c is cheap when a placement at 17-20c could possibly have been achieved in a few weeks as speculation builds in the lead up to canning drilling.

Also feel that a rights issue would have been more appropriate.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

A placement wouldn't surprise me, they will need more money for the Senegal project at some stage. Can't say I'm a big fan of these 'mates rates' deals, but that's the reality of the stockmarkets I guess, and the Australian stock market is weakly regulated to put it mildly so they can probably get away with it...
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

A placement to 'sophisticated' investors it is: at 14 cents. I'm sophisticated. I'm an investor. So why didn't I get any :mad:
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

A placement to 'sophisticated' investors it is: at 14 cents. I'm sophisticated. I'm an investor. So why didn't I get any :mad:
I can tell by your avatar and nic, rub me. LOL. :)

Raising the money at 14 looks ok considering the recent rapid gains. What was the average price while they were asking for the cash. Probably around 14 but it had come up from 10 pretty quickly.

I'm looking forward to the Canning Basin drilling potential in late July. Looks to be some upside for FAR there.

Looks like it's clearly broken up on the long term chart. Maybe .125 was the break, but breaking 15 looked pretty important, hopefully that's now support.
 

Attachments

  • FAR.gif
    FAR.gif
    44 KB · Views: 143
FAR - First Australian Resources

Oil and Gas Explorer with projects in Africa, Australia, China, and Nth America

Non operator with 18 years of production, exploration and deal flow in Nth America
414m shares on issue at 16 = $66m market cap
Cash 12.4m ish

Plans for 2007:

Prospect generation on world class Senegal project (FAR 30%)
Progress Offshore China discovery to development status Evaluate new 3D defines targets (FAR 5%)
Multi well program in Australia (3) Nth America (10) and China (4)
Lead player in ground floor 50 sq mile 3D program with multiple objectives onshore Gulf Coast (FAR 34%)
Lead player in ground floor 3D shoot at Wild River, Alberta, Canada (FAR 36%)

Canning Basin (Stokes Bay and Valentine – FAR 8% - operator ARQ)
Next drilling program is Onshore Canning Basin which will have a big increase in activity in 07. Drilling starts July
Stokes Bay estimated potential 33 BFC “A” Sand and 47 BFC “C” Sand and 11 mbo.
Valentine drill 1st week July estimated potential 200 mbo.

On the charts looks to be generally going up and has just recently broken through 15 ish and then tested it making it support. Litle bit of resistance at .175.

Research report from Strachan Corp indicates quite a bit upside from success at Canning Basin. (note: 'success')
Hartley's spec buy (Feb 07)
Stockresource buy up to 11 cents (Mar 07)
Fat Profits buy up to 9 cents (Aug 05)

Research reports here:
http://www.far.com.au/research/

Company web page
http://www.far.com.au/

(holding)
 

Attachments

  • Canning Drilling.GIF
    Canning Drilling.GIF
    44.1 KB · Views: 122
  • FAR.gif
    FAR.gif
    43.9 KB · Views: 120
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

New valuation out by Hartleys, valuing FAR at 32-64cps and Strachan has put an updated risked valuation of FAR out, putting on a "BUY" rating with an initial target of 25cps.

Will post here as soon as they become publically available.
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

I'll be happy to see 25c again gents - like watching grass grow since the beibu excitement last year. Would have sold then if I hadn't been bush. Took the axe to VPE after the Eagle disaster but couldn't bring myself to sell all of these:confused:.

Must say it can be an exercise in frustration though:(

Roll on Canning I say.

Onwards and upwards
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

I attended a Gold Coast seminar today where chairman Mike Evens gave a very good presentation, will definatly be watching these, BTW any other ASF members attending, porkpie
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Was the presentation the same as the AGM and Upstream Energy presentations (refer ASX announcements)?

Did you take any notes you are willing to share?
 
Re: FAR - First Australian Resources

Doc, don't know about AGM was'nt there, all I know is that I was impressed by what I saw & heard. Hartleys have a spec buy on them, as I said will be researching some more and tracking share price. porkpie
 
Top