- Joined
- 24 May 2009
- Posts
- 3,252
- Reactions
- 255
Mark Thompson said alot last night about the situation and about Essendon.
Alot was leaked to the media that shouldnt have, and Hird administered those drugs even though he was told not to go down that path.
Bottom line is -- those players were administered drugs and they dont have any data of what it was or how it will affect them.
Mr Burns, he was defending both, there is alot we dont know, but he didnt agree with the supplements, and as mentioned, he was asked why he didnt push for it to be stopped.
He also said the way the AFL dealt with it was wrong, but he also mentioned things about the Club.
I am sure there is alot more to it.
I can see it from both sides.
This thread has been fascinating lately, particularly the comparisons of viewpoint of the devotees and the non devotees.
The devotees favour the Lance Armstrong line of argument "We didn't do anything wrong, it's a conspiracy against us by those who are jealous of our success". The nondevotees are howled down for their objective arguments as to there being a program; the secrecy surrounding what drugs were injected; the frequency of the injections; and the possible health issues for the players in years to come as a result of this program.
It has been a bit like watching someone who has been diagnosed with cancer going through the emotional stages:
Denial;
Anger;
Bargaining;
Depression; and finally
Acceptance.
Some of the devotees posting here appear not to have reached the acceptance stage yet. Essendon brought this on themselves. I would bet that a silent majority of fans are disgusted, particularly at the aspect that the players have been treated with scant disregard in respect of possible effects on their long term health. The truth will come out and there aren't enough brooms in Australia to sweep it under the carpet.
The AFL dictatorship continues. Must be one of the few publicly visible businesses in Australia that has absolute power over its members etc
There was compelling evidence against Armstrong for doping and illegal activates, not so with Essendon, it seems the AFL think guilty by rumour is ok.
No one would take or administer a drug without knowing what it is and to suggest otherwise is just plain rubbish.
Of course-If you want to play in the AFL or any visible club or organisation,one must abide by the rules of that organisation.Often these rules or laws are not the same as the laws of the land.If not the option is to cease being a member.All players and clubs sign up to this with these organisations.Did Essendon sign up to abide by the code?
Why do you think that cricket players are fined and sanctioned by their organisation?
Clubs like bikie gangs have their own code,but it is not visible from the outside.We read about extreme punishments being handed out to violators of their code.
By George Prawn.....I think that you have got it!On the road to understanding there are many pitfalls Grasshopper>
Not being an Essendon supporter I cannot take any of this seriously.
Might be your turn next time.
So Essendon are out of the finals.Might be your turn next time.
Oh hello, here's a syringe, what's in it ?
I dunno.
Well let all line up and have some.
Doesn't really ring true to me.
Mr Burns there is no doubt that they did exactly that. The club has said that is what they did. Inject some players 100s of time and they cannot be sure what it was or who got what. They have admitted to that. I cannot see how you think they didn't.
Mr Burns there is no doubt that they did exactly that. The club has said that is what they did. Inject some players 100s of time and they cannot be sure what it was or who got what. They have admitted to that. I cannot see how you think they didn't.
May be still in the denial and anger stages. Give him time and he may (reluctantly) come to accept that what Essendon did was actually wrong.
You've got to be kidding or am I dreaming, are you really suggesting that supplements were given without knowing what they were ?
What would be the point ?
They couldn't judge results for starters.
- - - Updated - - -
Just using logic, give it a go sometime
And you believe they know what they injected into their players but aren't willing to disclose it? It must be a perfectly legal substance then.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?