Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,280
- Reactions
- 11,531
... and even further back, when Hird was one of the most scathing critics in the campaign against Cousins and Gardner. Yes, they associated with shady characters and "used" - but that was in their private lives, outside the sport, and what they took certainly did not enhance their performance. Not condoning their conduct, not even agreeing with Richmond's "life line" to the Cuz; but I can't get thoughts like "Holier than Thou" and "hypocrite" out of my mind when I hear how all those earlier arguments are forgotten now that the roles are reversed.
Which Essendon player is, or ever has been, at risk of obesity that they'd need injections?
I'm sure the Legal Team will be able to explain that too.
Disgusted
I think the players should have more leniency with taking anything recreational when it's not in the public, but should not be compared with taking 'performance enhancing' drugs.
We delve into philosophical territory here, but how does AOD improve performance. No one can answer that on what we have been presented and can google.
How is that disgusting?
Everyone is jumping at shadows.
Yes, I agree. Why take it if it doesn't have an effect?There doesn't seem to be any evidence that AOD has an anabolic effect but why were the players being given it if the intent wasn't to improve performance? It seems like they were fed a line about it's positive effects (despite the lack of evidence) and decided to give it a go (which makes them look even dumber if the drug that has caused them all this trouble had no positive effects).
They are like kids that get sold oregano thinking it's pot.
Yes, I agree. Why take it if it doesn't have an effect?
Poor argument.
I suppose their argument is that it was just a BS attempt to gain a recovery advantage. Does that enhance performance? On last years results, the answer is more than obviously no.
I agree.If a drug increases recovery then it's a performance enhancer (a lot of the stuff Tour De France guys take is designed to increase recovery).
I agree.
Like walking in freezing cold water the day after playing aids recovery. Like making sure you consume sufficient proteins after a game to aid in regeneration of the muscles. Llike carbo loading from Thursday night to aid in maximum energy. Like getting a pain killing injection at half time after a dislocated finger. Like being stitched up at three quarter time. Where is the line in the sand? The line is the legally placed left and right of arc by the governing bodies. If Essendon have crossed that line, then fine. Proof?
I agree.
Like walking in freezing cold water the day after playing aids recovery. Like making sure you consume sufficient proteins after a game to aid in regeneration of the muscles. Llike carbo loading from Thursday night to aid in maximum energy. Like getting a pain killing injection at half time after a dislocated finger. Like being stitched up at three quarter time. Where is the line in the sand? The line is the legally placed left and right of arc by the governing bodies. If Essendon have crossed that line, then fine. Proof?
Pretty soon they'll down to hammering the table.
I don't see any criminal charges pending
It all revolves around using peptides that weren't banned at time
Diimtrious is an over paid fool who should be replaced
If it was the national swimming team do you recon they would let a coach try and dictate terms?
Hird's different, and that's the point you're making, I think. It's interesting because he has such a strong belief in himself. Guys with strong beliefs in anything take a long time to crack, and when they do it's not pretty. The strength of belief is what made him successful, and now it will be his undoing. Shakespeare could have written this. Act 4, scenes 5-10 - Hird in denial.
My twenty cents worth..Essendon are on a hiding to nothing,if nothing else,the catch all bringing the game into disrepute will do them in.
And that they have certainly done in spades.
Burns you cannot be serious. Hird is cooked.
The game certainly has been bought into disrepute, but by who? Essendon, the AFL, the media? I would argue the media are the ones who have bought the game into disrepute IF the "supplements" weren't on the banned list at the time (which is what I understand/read somewhere), but the AFL has no jurisdiction over the media, unless the sue in the courts in which case the media will likely win.
Having said that, if the supplements were on the banned list, even as an Essendon supporter, I would be all for the Bombers spending some time in the VFL as punishment.
How Essendon supporters continue to blame everyone else but aren't angry at the club is amazing. If this happened at Hawthorn I would be furious with the club and everyone involved.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?