- Joined
- 7 April 2010
- Posts
- 972
- Reactions
- 106
Pretty bizarre.
It's either listed as a banned substance, or not.
Why do you have to dig deeper than that?
Read the label, idiots.
Or,
Maybe this is the organisational loop in the three strikes policy. Admit you've taken it, and it's all hunky dory.
Except that that applies to recreational drugs not performance enhancing ones.
I do agree though, the whole thing is bizarre
Except that that applies to recreational drugs not performance enhancing ones.
I do agree though, the whole thing is bizarre
This is going to be oh so tricky for the AFL...
Lets say they do find serious problems with the widespread administration of performance enhancing drugs. On the face of it the club should be penalized almost with suspension. Coaches and administrators could be banned, charged. Players could be suspended.
But what would be the effect on revenue of a suspended or severely handicapped Essendon Football Club ? How would the bombers fans respond ? What would the TV networks say about this ?
Will be fascinating to see how it comes out ..
:frown: come on guys -where's the faith!!??
If Craig Thomsen can claim innocence over 150 fraud charges, surely we can assume that this is also a big misunderstanding.
Duckman
Bombers' secret weapon backfires on AFL
Date
February 6, 2013 - 1:06PM
A high-profile club flaunting the unambiguous regulations. A large group of players – unwittingly, or not – using a banned substance to improve strength or aerobic capacity. A systematic and widespread abuse of the rules to which the competition had been hog-tied. Mandatory long-term suspensions imposed by an independent tribunal over which they had no influence.
For the AFL, and other major Australian sports, this was the nightmare scenario. The deep-seated reservation that caused the AFL, particularly, to squirm and prevaricate when, in 2005, the federal government demanded all Australian sports sign the World Anti-Doping Agency code.
Harry Houdini did not work as frantically to escape his bonds as the AFL worked to avoid signing with WADA. They claimed the WADA punishments for recreational drugs use were excessive, and adopted their own three strikes policy as an attempt to fulfil this obligation. They pleaded WADA's list of banned substances was arbitrary, and the program required costly in-house administration. They cited the major professional sports in the US, which were not signatories to WADA. Never mind that baseballers with forearms the size of Christmas hams were making Babe Ruth's famous slugs look like Little League pop flies.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...ires-on-afl-20130206-2dxtu.html#ixzz2K59L0ilD
"Kyle Reimers has come out and said things that are untrue," a spirited McVeigh said.
"He's a disgruntled player that was delisted by the football club that very rarely turned up to pre-season training in any sort of form that resembled a professional footballer.
I think it's a storm because of false information being provided by a disgruntled ex player. Reimers seems to have twisted the facts regarding the 'waiver' which sounds sinister. And everyone is having a cow because they were getting injections. Injections don't mean illegal.I really hope it turns out to be a storm in a teacup for the sake of Essendon and the AFL, but I'm not so sure it will be. Just way too many questions needing to be answered atm.
I think it's a storm because of false information being provided by a disgruntled ex player. Reimers seems to have twisted the facts regarding the 'waiver' which sounds sinister. And everyone is having a cow because they were getting injections. Injections don't mean illegal.
Essendon will be completely cleared of this and Reimers has lost any friend he may have had at Essendon. If he had any at all.
I think it's a storm because of false information being provided by a disgruntled ex player. Reimers seems to have twisted the facts regarding the 'waiver' which sounds sinister. And everyone is having a cow because they were getting injections. Injections don't mean illegal.
Essendon will be completely cleared of this and Reimers has lost any friend he may have had at Essendon. If he had any at all.
I think it's a storm because of false information being provided by a disgruntled ex player. Reimers seems to have twisted the facts regarding the 'waiver' which sounds sinister. And everyone is having a cow because they were getting injections. Injections don't mean illegal.
Essendon will be completely cleared of this and Reimers has lost any friend he may have had at Essendon. If he had any at all.
An Australian Crime Commission investigation has found widespread drug use in Australian professional sport, with some athletes being given substances not yet approved for human use
The year-long investigation has identified organised criminal networks which have been involved in distributing the drugs to athletes and support staff, including doctors and coaches. In at least one case an entire team is believed to have been doped.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?