Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bondi boomer couple convicted of $6m fraud​

A Sydney couple in their 60s have been sentenced to jail after they were found guilty of defrauding millions destined for charity and spending it on flash homes.


The wife of a disgraced lawyer from Sydney’s ritzy eastern suburbs almost collapsed in court today as her husband was sentenced to at least six years in prison for masterminding the theft of more than $6 million from the estates of elderly women, most of which had been intended for charities.

Therese O’Brien, 63, had to be helped to her seat and said “won’t someone look after him,” as her husband was led away in handcuffs.

The boomer couple spent the ill-gotten gains on luxury homes and furniture – and to top up their self managed superannuation fund.

Also a part of the multimillion-dollar plot, Therese O’Brien was sentenced to three years imprisonment but will be able to serve that as an intensive correction order including 500 hours community service.

Mark Leo O’Brien, 64, wearing a black polo shirt and green trousers in the dock, gave his wife a weak smile and final kiss on the lips before he was taken down for 10 years with a non parole period of six years.

Sentencing at Sydney’s Downing Centre courts today, Judge Robert Sutherland said the operation was a “carefully thought out subterfuge” that included moving moneys in and out of O’Brien’s law firm, between various bank accounts, mortgages and superannuation investments and the forging of several documents.

At the height of their crimes, the couple had traded up from a home worth more than $1 million in North Bondi, bordering the Pacific Ocean, to an even swankier house nearby. But it was this sudden upgrade to their living that was to be their downfall.

View attachment 121463

Therese O'Brien and her husband, Sydney lawyer Mark O'Brien, pleaded guilty to defrauding clients of more than $6 million. Picture: Gaye Gerard/NCA NewsWireSource:News Corp Australia

O’Brien was convicted on 10 charges including several involving dishonestly obtaining financial advantage by deception and knowingly dealing with the proceeds of crime. His wife was convicted of two charges including dealing with the proceeds of crime.

The couple, who met at Sydney University in the 1970s, were born and bred in Sydney’s well-to-do eastern suburbs.

Mark O’Brien was a lawyer whose legal firm looked after the estates of a number of wealthy older people in the area.

In 2015, a client passed away whose will left more than $1 million to a number of medical organisations and charities.

However, O’Brien funnelled that cash into a new bank account he had opened with it going towards paying off two mortgages on the couple’s North Bondi property.

Smaller donations were made to the charities in the will. But when those charities sent the law firm letters of acknowledgment, O’Brien would use them to forge fake letters for the full amount set out in the will in case his legal firm was audited.

Justice Sutherland said that showed “a degree of planning and sophistication” – on O’Brien’s part – had gone into the fraud.

According to court documents, when O’Brien told his wife about his scheme she was “horrified” and during an argument told him to “put it back”.

However, Justice Sutherland noted that, “his refusal to put the money back, put her in a moral conundrum that ultimately led her to acquiescence”.

Some of the money went into the couple’s superannuation fund and on interest free loans to their children of several hundred thousand dollars each. There is no suggestion the children knew where that money had originated.

View attachment 121464
Therese O'Brien and Mark O'Brien arrive at the Downing Centre court in Sydney for an earlier hearing in December, 2020. Picture: Joel Carrett/NCA NewsWireSource:News Corp Australia

HOW DECEIT UNRAVELLED
The earlier theft went undiscovered. But in 2017, O’Brien spied a further opportunity with another of his wealthy elderly clients for who he had power of attorney over.

“With self-confidence buoyed by the earlier misappropriation not being discovered and the forged letters undetected despite an audit, O’Brien decided to try his hand at fraudulent misappropriation again,” said Justice Sutherland.

At first he transferred smaller amounts while the woman was still alive. However, when she died she left an estate worth more than $6 million.

Like his previous victim, she had bequeathed large amounts of her wealth to charities, including around $3m to St Vincent de Paul Society.
Instead that money went to the O’Briens who used it to buy and then renovate a $3.4m home in Bondi Junction.
Theresa O’Brien spent $50,000 of the cash to buy furniture and decorate the couple’s new pad.
In total, the O’Briens extracted $6.1m from the estates of the deceased victims.

However, the ruse was revealed in early 2019 when O’Brien’s business partner from the firm Harrington, Maguire and O’Brien became suspicious about how he could afford a $3m-plus four-bedroom, four-bathroom Bondi home.

Initially O’Brien said his wife had come into the cash. But his colleague brought in auditors to scrutinise the firm’s accounts and established that he was misappropriating funds through the company.


Although O’Brien originally said the fraud was to benefit the struggling law firm he later conceded it was also done to fund his retirement.
The judge noted that the O’Briens have since paid back all the funds they took which is something of a rarity as in similar cases most of the money is quickly spent.

However, the couple invested most of the cash instead. Through selling their property (which had increased in value), emptying their super fund and by their children repaying back the loans, the charities eventually received the cash they had been promised years ago.
Justice Sutherland said he accepted the couple’s “deep remorse and contrition” but that did not absolve them from “criminal complicity”.
O’Brien will be eligible for parole in March 2027.

Editor’s note: Readers should not confuse this Mark O’Brien with defamation lawyer Mark O’Brien of Mark O’Brien Legal.
– Additional reporting by Steve Zemek

What a great result
"The judge noted that the O’Briens have since paid back all the funds they took which is something of a rarity as in similar cases most of the money is quickly spent. However, the couple invested most of the cash instead. Through selling their property (which had increased in value), emptying their super fund and by their children repaying back the loans, the charities eventually received the cash they had been promised years ago."

Highlighting issues & judgement
@Triple_Witching - post such as these should act as a deterrent (but they rarely do) as human nature never seems to change.

Skate.
 
At this stage in their lives, how many lawyers would want to be in the predicament that Tucker and Cowen now find themselves in... This was all self inflicted, meanwhile David Kennedy has slipped the noose and left Tucker and Cowen holding the can... #losers
 
With April Fools day soon upon us, two fools will be making the perilous walk from 15 Adelaide St Brisbane, to join their peers in The Supreme Court of Queensland, not as advocates, but as defendants... One of many walks of shame to come... #Marevainjunction
 
This prophetic cartoon from July 12, 2012, in circumstances eerily similar to the Simpsons predicting the future, showcased McIvor's predilection for comfy slippers...

Fast forward to 2021...
The man about to revolutionise banking, crypto currency, and getting constantly kicked out of tenancies, was spotted recently entering a local library on the Gold Coast, "in comfy slippers" to avail himself of some of their finest free internet offerings.

Now don't get all judgey and throw shade on good old (very old) “Mad Mac” (as he now like to be known) folks…

I'll have you know that Gold Coast public libraries have some of the finest scunge internet offerings in the world...

I’m sure good ol “Marky Boy” meets all sorts of revolutionary iconoclast’s there on the same path to global domination of, um, ahh, mmmm... whatever!!! You know what I'm getting at... But here’s the kicker guys, there’s no secret password or handshakes at these genius summits and brainstorming sessions… The Code Sign is…. Are you ready for it… Comfy slippers…
Next week there will an additional requirement… A matching bathrobe…

Who's off to Kmart to join the revolution ??? No one would have thought that the key to the universe would be in the same aisle where you buy grandpa's birthday presents...

#Pathetic #Grandpa
 
Last edited:
Remember that Tucker, in a sworn affidavit, threatened to declare himself bankrupt... Justice Reeves' comments will come back to haunt Tucker like the ghost of Christmas past...

Lot going on in the background, soon to be reported in the media... It appears that someone close to the action is spilling the beans to both the local and national scribes... Will keep you all updated.

Oh and a quick hello to our number one reader David Tucker, thanks for your support of the thread... 11 years and counting and another 11 years if that what it takes... JUSTICE IS COMING...

Have a great weekend everyone...



Take Steps to Frustrate the Collection of Money
Justice Reeves could not have summed it better below.

To have an officer of the court state in an affidavit that they would declare bankruptcy in the event of a judgment and frustrate the collection of money as a reason not to examine him is mind boggling...

How on earth can the Legal Services Commission tolerate such recalcitrant behaviour ???

Justice Reeves to his credit put him in his place. There is no special law for Tucker FFS...

44. If the liquidators li sue me, and I suffer a judgment against me in the sums alleged by the liquidators’ solicitors, or indeed a fraction of those amounts, and it is not covered by insurance, I would not seek to have recourse to the assets of the trusts or superannuation fund described above, but rather I would file for bankruptcy.

45. Nor could I seek to have recourse to the assets of my superannuation fund as the preservation age is 60, and I am currently aged 49, so I cannot draw funds from it for about 11 years.


Justice Reeves
37 Whether or not Mr Tucker is correct in these claims and asserted intentions are matters that the Liquidators will undoubtedly investigate during his examination and, depending on the answers he gives, will weigh up in deciding whether to pursue any proceeding against him.

However, I do not consider these statements can be used to prevent the Liquidators examining him with respect to his ability to meet a judgment in the contemplated proceeding. To do so would be to accede to the startling proposition that an examinee under Part 5.9 could foreclose on this area of examination under that Part by making claims in an application of this kind that the Liquidators will gain nothing by pursuing that area or, if they do succeed to a judgment, that he or she will take steps to frustrate the collection of any monies under that judgment. If that were the position, the examination power under Part 5.9 would be significantly hindered, if not rendered totally nugatory.

http://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2017/2017fca0758
 
Remember that Tucker, in a sworn affidavit, threatened to declare himself bankrupt... Justice Reeves' comments will come back to haunt Tucker like the ghost of Christmas past...

Lot going on in the background, soon to be reported in the media... It appears that someone close to the action is spilling the beans to both the local and national scribes... Will keep you all updated.

Oh and a quick hello to our number one reader David Tucker, thanks for your support of the thread... 11 years and counting and another 11 years if that what it takes... JUSTICE IS COMING...

Have a great weekend everyone...
No trust. Many thanks for the updates to keep us up to date list the latest. Will continue to read this forum for further updates.
 
It's now been over 18 months since the Receiver or the Liquidator have posted a report to Investors.
This is BULL ****.
Even if Tucker and Cowen are taken to the cleaners the Investors won't see one brass razoo.
The Liquidators will take the lot...as they did with KPMG.
Now I may be missing something here.... can someone please explain what is going on.
 
It's now been over 18 months since the Receiver or the Liquidator have posted a report to Investors.
This is BULL ****.
Even if Tucker and Cowen are taken to the cleaners the Investors won't see one brass razoo.
The Liquidators will take the lot...as they did with KPMG.
Now I may be missing something here.... can someone please explain what is going on.
Spot on Meridian...
 
..Mozzi said a long time ago that we are being treated like mushrooms - Kept in the dark and fed bull****! When you think how much
money has been frittered away by all these "professionals" they can hardly say that they are saving us money by not sending
out mailings etc. What a load of crap! Actually everything about this whole proceedings from start to finish has been exactly that! The Investors will never get another penny from this lot but you can put your shirt on a bet that there will be money made available for
everyone else who puts their hands out. That sure as Hell ain't going to be us.

As for the help we were supposed to get from ASIC - don't start Mozzi on that subject!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top