Yeah I think it is a ridiculous amount as well - it would nearly be best for all other shareholders if NPAT was less than AUD 6mm and the dilution didn't have to occur! They try and argue that it is effectively delayed consideration for the purchase of the business - and given I don't have enough information on how the valuation was done unfortunately it is difficult to comment.
The 32mm came from the prospectus (although the way they worded it was quite confusing). Basically their are three scenarios, NPAT less than 5mm (in which no additional shares are issued), NPAT between 5mm and 6mm (in which 32mm shares will be issued) and NPAT exceeding 6mm in which 72.5mm shares will be issued which looks to be the likely scenario.
So even though Simon Loh sold a number of his shares earlier in the year (I think he now holds around 42%, following the issue of shares he will be back over 50%. Overall it seems very excessive given he has already directly benefited from the increasing share price.
The 32mm came from the prospectus (although the way they worded it was quite confusing). Basically their are three scenarios, NPAT less than 5mm (in which no additional shares are issued), NPAT between 5mm and 6mm (in which 32mm shares will be issued) and NPAT exceeding 6mm in which 72.5mm shares will be issued which looks to be the likely scenario.
So even though Simon Loh sold a number of his shares earlier in the year (I think he now holds around 42%, following the issue of shares he will be back over 50%. Overall it seems very excessive given he has already directly benefited from the increasing share price.