- Joined
- 20 November 2005
- Posts
- 787
- Reactions
- 92
Greetings Snake,It's Snake Pliskin said:How efficient is EW for determining the future?
There are two elements of concern: time and price.
If time is corruptable due to the action of price then how does using EW achieve accurate projections?
Using it from a trader's point of view I am interested in.
Bobby said:Greetings Snake,
I think its just a supplement of possiblity, in todays speed of internet trading, EW seems redundant.
Take care
Bob.
It's Snake Pliskin said:Hi Bob,
Good to have you comment this evening.
I have been delving into some wave analysis and would like to talk to some people about it. You mentioned the speed of the internet. Are you saying it creates too much noise to accurately define waves?
I have come across a variation of EW that I am still trying to understand. I will post it in due coarse but would like to draw a reference point from what is percieved as traditional EW and go from there. Nick, Magdoran and Wavepicker and all lets talk EW.
EW is one thing I need to add to my toolbox.
Regards
Snake
Bobby said:Hello Snake,
Its like a prognosis of the maybe.
Cheers Bob.
swingstar said:A book I'm reading (Dynamic Trading by Miner) says Elliott Wave is only useful 50% of the time. Or rather Elliott Wave can only be applied about 50% of the time, and pretty much only the basic impulse and ABC correction is useful for trading. The author doesn't recommend EW software since they try to apply an EW count all of the time on anything, when there won't always be one, or one with any practical value.
I've been (went)to a Profit Source seminar BTW, a few years ago. They also advocated EW back then. The strategy they suggested was shorting ABC corrections after the software had counted a five wave impulse.
Nick Radge said:The minor labelling opens many more opportunities for trades as well as getting a better idea of when the larger waves will complete.
I still believe eyeballing will be better for you in the longer term, especially knowing the volume nuances as well. Here is an example of AUW with clear volume attributes that are confirming a very good probability wave-iii high:
It's Snake Pliskin said:Bob,
I"ll talk to the resident experts, but it is interesting. The problem I have is "where do I put the counts"? Why not here instead of there?
Cheers
Bobby said:Some say from the first listing, but others don't.
Bob.
It's Snake Pliskin said:If time is corruptable due to the action of price then how does using EW achieve accurate projections?
smoothjp said:It seems advanced get is $3995 and then you would need scanner too for another $1560 to have an equivalent package to that of profitsource?
Nick Radge said:Here is another example of "practical" trading without knowing the larger picture.
A 5-wave was completed up. So far the the small 3-wave has not travelled the "typical" distance, so the risk is it has not completed. Therefore yesterday's strength will probably fail and prices will continue lower. From a practical trading standpoint, any move above the wave-v would invalidate that continued bearish expectation and suggest the trend will continue. Obviously one expecting the "typical" pattern to unfiold would place a protective stop above those highs. Whether this is a larger uptrend or downtrend does not matter from a "practical" trading standpoint, there is still an opportunity. If/when prices reach the "typical" area for a correction one may then need to assess the larger picture or if one intends to trade the larger swings, then the same procedure should be applied to weekly charts.
This post may contain advice that has been prepared by Reef Capital Coaching ABN 24 092 309 978 (“RCC”) and is general advice and does not take account of your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on this general advice you should therefore consider the appropriateness of the advice having regard to your situation. We recommend you obtain financial, legal and taxation advice before making any financial investment decision.
Past performance is not a reliable indication of future performance. This material has been prepared based on information believed to be accurate at the time of publication. Subsequent changes in circumstances may occur at any time and may impact the accuracy of the information.
tech/a said:There is a good reason WHY Prechter has been less than accurate with very large timeframe analysis I think.
I'll bring this up later in the Technical Analysis sister thread later.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?