wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,961
- Reactions
- 13,264
There reported incidents of such events with mobile phones etc. e.g. I recall warnings not to put the phone under a pillow because someone managed to start a fire that way.I'm wondering what the difference is of EV batteries that goes 'into thermal runaway' and the batteries in mobile phones, laptops, portable vacuum cleaners, which are all transported in bulk surrounded in plastic components and packaging.
In the future, a large number of road vehicles will not be powered by fossil fuels, and in order to prevent incidents in connection with such a change in the transportation sector, regulations and practices should stay one step ahead. Road tunnels and underground garages constitute particularly high-risk environments with regard to fires and explosions. The transportation sector is currently undergoing major changes, driven in large part by the gradual transition towards a fossil fuel-independent society.
Scale and ability to deal with it.I'm wondering what the difference is of EV batteries that goes 'into thermal runaway' and the batteries in mobile phones, laptops, portable vacuum cleaners, which are all transported in bulk surrounded in plastic components and packaging.
Wayne If not even faster !!!!There
There reported incidents of such events with mobile phones etc. e.g. I recall warnings not to put the phone under a pillow because someone managed to start a fire that way.
Researching futher with regards to my own setup.... Holy Mary, mother of Jesus!! I have got to change things Pronto!
Well then Mr Smurf size does matter!!!!Scale and ability to deal with it.
If a small electronic device starts emitting smoke well then pick it up, put it outside and it can burn harmlessly. Throw it out the window if it's really urgent but point is, if someone's aware of the problem then relocating the device itself is achievable.
Plus the scale of damage. Even if the battery does burn, the scale of smoke and heat produced mostly isn't going to cause any real damage to either humans or property as long as it doesn't set anything else on fire. If it's just the phone itself burning, that's not a lot of heat and the smoke will readily disperse to safe levels.
Versus an EV where the battery's an order of magnitude larger and it's impractical to relocate once it's burning. Far more chance it's somewhere problematic.
Comparing the scale, well an iPhone battery is about 12Wh whereas a Tesla Model 3 battery is 50,000 to 82,000 Wh depending on model variant. So an order of magnitude scale difference.
at size.
Scale and ability to deal with it.
If a small electronic device starts emitting smoke well then pick it up, put it outside and it can burn harmlessly. Throw it out the window if it's really urgent but point is, if someone's aware of the problem then relocating the device itself is achievable.
Plus the scale of damage. Even if the battery does burn, the scale of smoke and heat produced mostly isn't going to cause any real damage to either humans or property as long as it doesn't set anything else on fire. If it's just the phone itself burning, that's not a lot of heat and the smoke will readily disperse to safe levels.
Versus an EV where the battery's an order of magnitude larger and it's impractical to relocate once it's burning. Far more chance it's somewhere problematic.
Comparing the scale, well an iPhone battery is about 12Wh whereas a Tesla Model 3 battery is 50,000 to 82,000 Wh depending on model variant. So an order of magnitude scale difference.
at size.
i wonder if that will apply if the owner of said vehicle is charging from a home solar supply , or home battery storage?Good evening
Moves afoot, if this article is to be believed, to turn domestic power off in Queensland, when owners are charging a vehicle at home during high peak times of electricity use. If that makes sense.
Home electric-car charging to be controlled by authorities under controversial Queensland proposal
Under a new proposal, home electric-car chargers in Queensland could be controlled by the state's energy authority.www.drive.com.au
Kind regards
rcw1
I have a full lithium battery setup for the house and this is not something I forget.It doesn't really matter what started the fire. I think the point is that once those battery cells go into thermal runaway, you've got big problems. Depending on the situation, it could be catastrophic.
It's given me pause to think as I have a lithium battery setup in my work ute, as well as at least two LPG bottles ?
Have you seen how those electronic devices are transported from the source country? We’re talking about thousands of devices packed together, not only phones but scooters, vacuum cleaners, torches, laptops. All stacked wide & high.
Do you remember when Samsung phones were exploding? Airlines banned passengers with them. Imagine a container of that.
Why is the difference?
I have a full lithium battery setup for the house and this is not something I forget.
Another reason I am far less tempted by an EV than I was 2 y ago.
Batteries in a dynamic (car) environment are subjected to vibrations, shocks, thermal and moisture exposures far far worse than static, in a garage.
This lithium battery option for EV is really not the solution..even if lithium was plentiful..which it is not.
I wonder how long it will take for this truth to be acknowledged
And when you think we could all run on Syngas for the same price or supposed effect on warming the planet.lol..or scarcity/pollution of oil.?.but
no wa.ker showing off 0 to 60 at the traffic lights in his Tesla when you can use Syngas in a 12y old second hand Toyota bought for $5k..ahh well with EV you'll queue at the recharge station but not on the traffic free roads...
If a container does go up, one mighty big explosion.Have you seen how those electronic devices are transported from the source country? We’re talking about thousands of devices packed together, not only phones but scooters, vacuum cleaners, torches, laptops. All stacked wide & high.
Do you remember when Samsung phones were exploding? Airlines banned passengers with them. Imagine a container of that.
Why is the difference?
absolutely everything in the con can be said for electrics...point by point, but at least we do not need new cars ..not insignificant...Conversely, some cons come with the idea of synthetic fuels. The most apparent being that synthetic fuels are not as sustainable as green alternatives. A battery can be recharged through renewable sources, such as solar panels and wind turbines. Fuels will never have that options.Another natural problem with synthetic fuels would be the supply. Currently, there is simply no way that supply could meet demand. Assuming every person in the US switched to synthetic fuels, they would need around 45-50 billion liters – a year. Meanwhile, the production output for one synthetic fuel company is only projected to be about 55 million liters a year. The numbers do not match up.Finally, it all comes back around to sustainability. Could the industry keep up production long-term? That’s an excellent question. A lot of energy goes into making synthetic fuels – arguably as much as, if not more than, what it would take to charge a battery. Likewise, it does take base materials to create, which have efficiency concerns.
absolutely everything in the con can be said for electrics...point by point, but at least we do not need new cars ..not insignificant...
Why would they when there is nearly a hot war between China and the US?BYD has overtaken Volkswagen as the biggest seller of vehicles for the first quarter of 2023.
Interesting that they do not plan to sell cars into the US market.
AS inscrutable as ever.
View attachment 160747
BYD has overtaken Volkswagen as the biggest seller of vehicles for the first quarter of 2023.
Interesting that they do not plan to sell cars into the US market.
AS inscrutable as ever.
View attachment 160747
BYD: No plans to challenge Tesla in U.S. anytime soon
BYD's founder threw cold water on the prospect of the Chinese electric-vehicle maker challenging Tesla in its home market — for now.
BYD Co. doesn't have any current plans to enter the U.S. passenger car market, founder Wang Chuanfu said, throwing cold water on the prospect of the Chinese electric-vehicle maker challenging Tesla Inc. in its home market — for now.
The auto titan, which reported that net income more than quintupled last year after it sold a record number of EVs, said at a post-earnings briefing on Wednesday that its home market of China has already entered a "full-expansion phase" for new-energy vehicles.The US is the next biggest EV market after China, where a price war has erupted between BYD, Tesla and other EV makers. Backed by Warren Buffett, BYD has been expanding its footprint overseas, including into Norway, Denmark, the UK, Thailand and Australia. Wang predicted that the development of clean-energy vehicles will lead to a reshuffling within the global auto industry.
Given that BYD isn't entering the U.S. passenger EV market for now, Wang doesn't foresee any impact from President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which offers generous incentives for selling EVs but has stringent requirements on manufacturing and supply-chain sourcing. Final details of the legislation, passed into law last year, are due to be released on Friday.
BYD sold 1.86 million electric and plug-in hybrids in 2022, more than the previous four years combined. It accounted for about 30% of all new-energy vehicle sales in China, with half of them battery-only EVs. In comparison, Tesla delivered 1.31 million EVs globally.
BYD stopped producing cars powered entirely by fossil fuels last year.
The world’s largest battery-powered ship is to be built in Australia, in a breakthrough for decarbonising global shipping and growing the nation’s shipbuilding industry.
Tasmanian aluminium catamaran shipbuilder Incat is building the 130m lightweight fast ferry, using a Finnish-supplied electric propulsion and waterjet system, at its yards in Hobart.
The vessel will have 40MWh of battery storage, making it the largest battery-powered ship by any measure, according to Incat and Finnish partners Wartsila.
“It’s the world’s largest battery-powered vessel in length, in tonnage and in energy storage, by quite some margin,” Incat managing director Craig Clifford said.
“This is a massive step forward (for decarbonising shipping). There are increasing pressures around the world, but particularly in northern Europe, to go green and really concentrate on emissions. We may well have delivered our last diesel-powered vessel.
“We’re at the precipice of a large leap in the industry.
“It’s similar in our view from going from sail to steam and then from steam to coal and diesel.
“It’s a real transformation.”
Incat, which has been building high-speed aluminium catamarans, largely for major passenger and vehicle ferries, since the 1990s, is planning to almost double its 400-strong workforce to meet demand for electric vessels.
The battery-powered vessel, which will carry 2100 passengers and 226 vehicles between Argentina and Uruguay for Uruguayan ferry operator Buquebus, will be capable of sailing at 25 knots for 1½ hours.
Incat has another order for a similar all-electric vessel from a European client.
“As a company, we think this electric path that we’re going down is the right path and very exciting for us,” Mr Clifford said.
“Regulators around the world are going to be making it harder and harder for diesel for to be used in an operating environment and we want to remain at the leading edge of the industry.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?