Again, if you knew anything then you would know where the future lies and where massive investments in hydrogen are being made, and started by doing some basic research to inform yourself.Nice way to start a reply "if you knew anything..." settle down.
How are you producing your hydrogen by using high carbon emission natural gas or carbon monoxide producing methods?
Both sound stellar for the environment.
No doubt there are big investments being made, so far a lot of the investments are scams like solar roadways. I thought this was about improving environmental outcomes.Again, if you knew anything then you would know where the future lies and where massive investments in hydrogen are being made, and started by doing some basic research to inform yourself.
So stop shooting yourself in the foot.
This is what so many critics say, yet they willing have probably bought many clothing items which have come from sweat shops and nations employing underage children. And how many engagement rings contain blood diamonds? Your point is a diversion as the capacity of individuals, through their own labour, to produce the necessary quantities for industry is almost zero.
@Value Collector - you might be too generous.Hydrogen can be produced using green energy sources.
Seriously mate, it’s like you are working off information and arguments that are 10 years old.
Again, if you knew anything then you would know where the future lies
Taking a neutral position ideologically and politically, it could similarly be argued that cities themselves are the ultimate problem.I lived for a decade in big cities and never owned a car. A car is an unnecessary PITA in modern high density cities
effectively modern slavery including children in the most horrific conditions.
Hydrogen can be produced using green energy sources.
Taking a neutral position ideologically and politically, it could similarly be argued that cities themselves are the ultimate problem.
Take a few moments to look at the scale of investment and speed that Fortescue metals is moving in that directionTrue but largely pointless statement when you look at the scale of production required then the green concept gets way less obvious if it is even possible.
Now you are making even less sense. There are no solar roadways in existence, so don't confuse a concept being trialed with the real thing.No doubt there are big investments being made, so far a lot of the investments are scams like solar roadways. I thought this was about improving environmental outcomes.
FYI, repeating a similar point with different emphasis cannot be a logical fallacy. It's a fact of life in this world that not every country has strong labour laws, as @Smurf1976 points out.No the point is still valid and it's irrelevant that the same point applies to diamonds and apple phones etc.
You have made a logical fallacy.
I can understand that.Sorry I didn't really get the other points you were making.
I contexted my comment in relation to hydrogen so stop trying to be a smartarse. This thread has over 290 pages and within them you will find a lot about what is happening on the hydrogen front.If you knew anything you would know that if you knew where the future lies you would be a god or something similar, getting a bit above yourself.
Take a few moments to look at the scale of investment and speed that Fortescue metals is moving in that direction
That has been brought up many times.The ultimate problem is the question that is not allowed to be even thought ie; how many humans can the planet sustain.
Two links were immediately above your post!A link or something would be helpful. I won't be replying any further tonight tho. Thanks for discussion.
Now you are making even less sense. There are no solar roadways in existence, so don't confuse a concept being trialed with the real thing.
That has been brought up many times.
The other problem that brings up and has been mentioned is, the amount of greenhouse gas produced by the extra humans, is proportional to their affluence.
That is as humans become more affluent they consume more energy, because they buy more electronic junk, so the extra demand on the electrical supply increases.
Funnily enough the ones who scream the most about climate change are the elites, who consume the most power in their McMansions, with their cinema rooms and their Range Rovers.
We are a weird lot aren't we. ?
Thankfully Elon Musk has now given the elites a "clean" car, with the snob value, to replace the Range Rover, that's a big step in he right direction.
That is a true statement, but it doesn't actually give a fair representation of the actual issue.At the moment coal stations are closing earlier than they were originally scheduled to just because of the economics, the coal stations are struggling to compete in the market against renewables.
We had a premier that spruiked cars that ran on water!Mayor Pete, in the US is spruking them as we speak.
Do you not remember the hype around solar roadways Wattways??
It's the typical false green scam that gets promoted to the public as an environmental benefit.
Engineers and construction companies love green investment but the more data comes in we learn how scammy much of it is and at the public expense.
The World bank has even published papers on the negative environmental impacts of so called green investment.
There is no one link to explain the whole thing, but here is one link.A link or something would be helpful. I won't be replying any further tonight tho. Thanks for discussion.
What crap are you talking about, you arrogance is only eclipsed by your ignorance.We had a premier that spruiked cars that ran on water!
You are digging up such crap it beggars belief.
Green investments are driving first world economies more strongly than most other investment sectors, and most of it is privately funded.
If you want to be credible, link to sources.
When I went outside today the sky was falling. I even took a photo.
I suggest you get back on topic and start asking questions that make sense.
I was under the impression that it isn’t coal plants having to switch on and off that’s the problem, because they aren’t really doing that, it’s the suppression of the actual whole sale price, by solar and wind, at least that’s how AGL was explaining it.That is a true statement, but it doesn't actually give a fair representation of the actual issue.
The coal stations are struggling to compete with renewables, because they have to run inefficiently or be taken off line to allow renewables to provide power when they are generating, when the renewables aren't generating because there is no sun and no wind, the coal generators have to re start and provide the power required to keep the lights on.
So to say carte blanche that they struggle to compete, doesn't honestly reflect the situation, it is cherry picking that renewables are cheaper when they are running, but they aren't always running which goes back to at call generation and storage.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?