- Joined
- 28 December 2013
- Posts
- 6,392
- Reactions
- 24,319
Hello Skate,
None of what I use is based on Ehlers work or indicators. This is something that I have been working on for 15 years originally based on the work of Hurst and James Maggio and has undergone a lot of trial and error. As mentioned to a reply in another thread about repainting. One indicator does not at all, the other does a small percentage of the time and by with a negligible change in the curve as proved in a historical graph. Any indicator based on closing price repaints assuming price is changing and until that bar is almost complete. For me an indi that repaints a small % of the time but keeps you in the right side most of the time, far outweighs a useless lagging indicator that does not repaint.
Further to last post. This morning a buy was signaled on the AUS200 off the 3h chart. These trades always taken and not knowing if this a counter trend or not initial TP(50%) is set at value of 3hr 20 EMA of 14ATR at time of trade and SL moved to BE for the rest. SL set to 1.5X ATR. To understand if this move will be anything more sustained I consult the daily Trend Indicator which at the moment has not crossed above -100 as such the trend is still assumed down. A cross above -100 can only be generated by higher prices or wait till tomorrows opening to confirm and check again.
Thanks for sharing on PANDA Skate. You have no real reason to do so, other than giving to the ASF community. I had the opportunity to digest a couple of Ehler books late last year while on various flights and work trips but haven't found time/motivation to explore his ideas further. Just knowing someone has found value and parameters that work for a strategy is inspiration enough sometimes for others to push a bit harder. Who knows how much time we'll have soon for system development and backtesting.
Hello Skate, I have not come across DSMA before but what you describe sounds somewhat similar to the Kaufman Adaptive MA and possibly the Mcgingly Dynamic. Correct me if I'm wrong.@Newt, I have found value in Ehler ideas as his mathematical equations are clean & simple. The maths to arrive at his Deviation Scaled Moving Average Indicator (DSMA) is simply stunning to say the least. The DSMA indicator is only a few lines of code that smooths the data of an exponential moving average (EMA) that incorporates a "dynamic" smoothing coefficient that is "updated" based on the magnitude of price changes. (brilliant)
@gartley has been been fine tuning "Hurst and James Maggio" work for 15 years, something that I find stimulating & fresh. We all post in the "Dump it here" thread in the hope of "giving to the ASF community" by sharing ideas, knowledge & experience. Educational posts displays a level of caring by passing information on to others in the hope of helping, what they do with the informations depends if it engages them, without engagement "thinking on a deeper level" won't happen.
Skate.
"thinking on a deeper level"
Peter Eliades (do a youtube search) has done a lot of work with this and will soon release specialized software that deals with this concept. His calls have been spectacular to date).
defeated, sought take step back, these are letters 8 for B etc,nope then suite what is next? (in this case next triplet or just linear sequence) or if suite :what is the intruder? Anyway, I would have failed I had a quick discard at mirror, inverse etc As I do not find the answer i reply here, obviously if you find the answer , if there is one, do not spoil it and PM @Skate BTW, if confronted to such a test, i would not even try to do it and would just say thanks, no time for that and this type of employer
To help stop the spread of coronavirus - Wash your hands to help prevent the spread of COVID-19
Is there a beginners guide or a good read up on the net somewhere. Maybe something like the ASX explained for dummies? I have really taken a step back now after reading alo on this forum seems like alot of people lose money on the ASX and the only people that make it are the very smart investors with bucketloads of experience.
There is a lot to learn and I'm as keen as mustard would have been a bit better if I started researching 6 months ago. Its hopefully going to be a fun journey and an educational eye opener for me.
Bit of background - first time ASX investor, I'm willing to hold for 3-5 years to make a profit or even much longer, don't mind dividends either but not fussed if I invest in a no dividend paying company. Eventually I would really like to have a fair bit of money tied up in the ASX that could potentially earn me at least 50 to 60K after tax via dividend payments. I know this is no easy feat and from some rough calculations and some extremely good stock picks I'm thinking I would at least need to pick the best dividends stocks and probably have at least $800,000 invested for that kind of return.
Some beaten up large caps which have come to my attention include: ANZ, CIM, FMG, MQG, NAB, ORG, RIO, SCG, STO, WBC. Disclosure - I've recently bought some of these.
Investing can sometimes be a little more easier to mentally handle than trading.
Okay ... still waiting Skate???
Okay ... still waiting Skate???
Ok, now I understand the question.
What was the answer to the puzzle
When I turned over the exam paper I was taken back to say the least, it caught me off guard then I focused on a few things, the hieroglyphics & the pencil. When I turned over the exam paper this confronted me. The hieroglyphics below was "all" that was on the paper.
View attachment 101937
I was thinking
1. Why the half pencil & not a full pencil ? (quickly dismissed as irrelevant)
2. The pencil was supplied so I could give my answer in words or to draw a pattern that links the patterns
3. After studying the pattern - did they (a) require an explanation what the pattern was or (b) did they want the next pattern to be drawn (that was a major decision)
4. My thinking was that "a pencil is for drawing" - so I drew the next pattern
5. The exam seem to last forever but the answer came to me in a few minutes, the rest of the time I was struggling with what the question was that they wanted - explanation in words or the next image drawn.
We see patterns everywhere
Humans have a unique ability to spot patterns that has been fine tuned by evolution & we superbly adapted to understand the visual world. Pattern recognition is for our survival as a species & it's the very reason a cloud formation looks like a bunny or Elvis. Sometimes our mind deceives us presenting pattern when in fact there isn't any. We unconsciously take for granted how good we are at making sense of what our eyes show us & sometimes we don't appreciate how difficult it is when we are shown a new pattern without an explanation can be difficult to understand.
The answer I gave
I drew the next image, which was correct.
View attachment 101936
Skate.
You aren't aloneaGGGGHHHHH!!!
I'm still a fail!
aGGGGHHHHH!!!
I'm still a fail!
You aren't alone
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?