- Joined
- 17 October 2012
- Posts
- 707
- Reactions
- 1,389
The market is fascinating
One of the reasons that the market is so fascinating is that it combines elements of psychology, business, mathematics, and numerous other disciplines and sciences.
Skate.
You forgot fortune telling!
The market is fascinating - One of the reasons that the market is so fascinating is that it combines elements of psychology, business, mathematics, "and numerous other disciplines" and sciences.
WHY FACTS DON’T CHANGE OUR MINDS
Fact
Even after the evidence “for their beliefs has been totally refuted, people fail to make appropriate revisions in those beliefs,”
Confirmation bias
Consider what’s become known as “confirmation bias,” the tendency people have to embrace information that supports their beliefs and reject information that contradicts them. Of the many forms of faulty thinking that have been identified, confirmation bias is among the best.
If reason is designed to generate sound judgments, then it’s hard to conceive of a more serious design flaw than confirmation bias.
Skate.
So many automatic thoughts are triggered when you're wrong. Ego defense mechanisms protect us from experiencing these painful feelings. We deny being wrong, or repress the pain or project it onto others. For example, we lose objectivity, we get triggered and don't know why, we lose access to subtle feelings which can guide decision-making (especially important in discretionary trading), and so on.
@Gringotts Bank
You can condition how & what to think, meaning you can train your "psychological outlook" allowing you to be able to overcome or handle the stress & pressure when things go horribly wrong.
Self control
It’s vital and very important to learn how to train your mind to accept stress when trading. Controlling your emotions, training your mind to stay calm under pressure, responding, rather than reacting to a situation, controlling how and what you think is so important in this game.
Skate.
Absolute Gold. Why people think they need to pay for someone or some method to lead them to profit----.?
ISX - Someone knew (the timeline)
10/9/2019 - closed $1.645 (in a very long up trend)
11/9/2019 - unexpected - large down-bar closing at $1.41
12/9/2019 - another large down-bar closing at $0.93 (this triggered my trailing stop)
13/9/2019 - Adverse News Report released at 9.31 am
13/9/2019 - My exit was already in the pre-auction before the news release
13/9/2019 - Exited ISX at the opening price. Skate.
OK, I'll start here as I have plenty to learn. My exits are simply a weekly close below 100 day SMA and position score outside of top 20% (variable) of stocks in $XAO (top 100) as rated by position score which is just momentum measured over a chosen lookback period. No rocket science there. I've wondered about using your ROC(close,20) as an additional stale stop, but as I'm a coding dumbass, I'll have to consult my mentor about that. I also agree with your statement @Skate about exits being the most important and overlooked aspect of trading.
Question: Is it possible to code an exit that has an edge? An edge all by itself is what I'm asking.
Random entry any time and then exit mechanically, systematically, not discretionary. That should be clear enough, but just in case, your code must have:
Buy = 1; Buyprice = something that is obtainable, like Open or Close, not Low. I don't think it can be done but I could be wrong. It is obvious that some exits work better than others but that's not the issue. I'm not asking for secrets or the code, just whether anyone can say that they have statistical evidence of such an exit. (and not just quoting Van Tharp)
EXITS of a short to medium term trader.
(1) Initial Stop Loss exit (iSL): This is the first exit I consider. This exit is important because it's placed at a price that if traded indicates that my timing or my chart analysis is wrong. This exit is also important because I use it to calculate my position size. I don't buy a fixed dollar amount, rather, I risk a fixed fraction (ie 0.5% - 1%) of my total account.
If price closes below this level I must sell. My timing or analysis is wrong and I must realise the loss immediately because if my timing or analysis is wrong then the price is probably going to fall further. If my iSL is below support and support fails, price is likely to fall further. Sell!
Acting on this exit is the first important skill to master in order to be a profitable trader. Learning this skill will enable a new trader to survive long enough to learn the next important skill.
(2) Trailing Stop exit (TS): Once our trade becomes profitable this is the exit we have to master next. Mastering this exit is difficult. Most profitable traders will tell you that they still haven't mastered this one yet. However they do know what they have to do in order to be profitable.
This exit stop is only ever raised not lowered (after a buy setup). The method that we use to raise our TS must match the type of movement we're trying to profit from.
If our aim is to profit from a very short term move then we may raise the TS below the prior days low or use a short term moving average or a volatility measure from the recent high.
If our aim is to profit from a medium term trend then I would suggest raising the stop below recent higher swing lows. This is difficult because the trader must allow prices to pull-back to form these higher lows. Prices normally pull-back to 50% - 62% levels of the prior move up. In these situations this means losing >50% of our open profits. This is the worst time to close your trade as we have all experienced.
Raising our TS higher reduces the trade heat (downside exposure) and protects open profits. Don't raise your TS until you've earned above average profits in the trade. Your past trade stats will indicate when this happens.
Letting or profits get bigger is the second important skill that we must master and it relies on how we manage the trailing stop exit.
(3) Price Target exit (PT): Generally only used by short term traders. Must never be used by trend traders.
An edge all by itself is what I'm asking. Random entry any time and then exit mechanically, systematically, not discretionary. I don't think it can be done but I could be wrong. It is obvious that some exits work better than others but that's not the issue. I'm not asking for secrets or the code, just whether anyone can say that they have statistical evidence of such an exit.
Moreover
You have also mentioned once or twice about discretionary exits on takeover & capital raising announcements.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?