- Joined
- 27 November 2017
- Posts
- 1,200
- Reactions
- 1,887
Correct you are mate, not sure how I stuffed that up.I note two previous tops at $8.61 (2006) and $8.60 (early 2010) so around there might be a possible target it it can get past the 2018 high of $7.98.
BTW has anyone noticed the massive performance rights of more than 30000o shares https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20190603/pdf/445kxx758tpd6z.pdf
What was delivered to earn this
Thanks @travNot sure about BUY but maybe WATCH.
DOW were having a good year then their partner on the Murra Warra WInd Farm entered self administration causing the SP to gap down. Maybe a bit more pain is in sight once the dust settles. I would wait for the project to get get completed or another announcement clarifying impact to Downer.
View attachment 95518
View attachment 95519
Weekly - DOW looking good in 2019 until Wind Farm Update
View attachment 95520
I believe that these shares are not for the directors but employees used to encourage retention.
View attachment 95523
Touched 8.70 today, a 10 year high, been a great 4 and a half years for Downer, the charts really good, all boats rising and all that.
Engineering services companies are always a minefield IMO, they always appear to be one bad quote away from oblivion, United Construction comes to mind from recent history.I've lost count of the number of times that DOW has disappointed their shareholders. There's a lot of huge gap downs on the daily chart since 2006 when they had troubles with the NSW train contracts. DOW has been on my never to be traded list since then and I've not been disappointed with that decision.
However I do understand how a very contrarian trader (buying after any of these poor news announcements) could have traded DOW with much more success than a break-out trader.
Does anyone sense a possible buying opportunity?
Engineering services companies are always a minefield IMO, they always appear to be one bad quote away from oblivion.
Where the danger arises is if the company takes on projects which are large relative to the size of the company.The nature of the game - with big contracting you win some and you lose some.
while I somewhat agree with you surely these companies have enough experience with major projects to know that they can be high risk with real prospects for project blowouts. Can’t they put in place risk management strategies to deal with these scenarios and mitigate the downside?The nature of the game - with big contracting you win some and you lose some.
A friend worked as an accountant for Downer's (I better be careful here) they found it extremely stressful dealing with the various reporting discrepancies coming back from site managers, the figures were often rubbery, incomplete and often missing vital pieces of information. So it made forecasting and budgeting difficult and often inaccurate, the old rubbish in rubbish out phenomenon.while I somewhat agree with you surely these companies have enough experience with major projects to know that they can be high risk with real prospects for project blowouts. Can’t they put in place risk management strategies to deal with these scenarios and mitigate the downside?
A friend worked as an accountant for Downer's (I better be careful here) they found it extremely stressful dealing with the various reporting discrepancies coming back from site managers, the figures were often rubbery, incomplete and often missing vital pieces of information. So it made forecasting and budgeting difficult and often inaccurate, the old rubbish in rubbish out phenomenon.
The individuals involved can be a crucial factor too in this business.Cost blowout due to site issues can be enormous. Covering poor planning and logistics, with overnight transport companies bringing materials to site, can cost amazing sums of money.lol
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?