- Joined
- 21 June 2009
- Posts
- 5,880
- Reactions
- 14
There was a report on Radio National today that Therese Rein has said she will be encouraging Kevin to make a full recovery before returning to work. She expected this would take at least two weeks following his discharge from hospital. That pretty much takes him right up to the election date.
He continued campaigning for the rest of the day after the dodgy gall bladder had been diagnosed so it would appear the acute attack had subsided.
I'm probably being fanciful, but can't help wondering if this little event is actually, um, heaven sent to save him from himself, and the embarrassment of having to appear to be attempting to support Julia Gillard?
Do they? Can you say what these signs are? Lindsay Tanner has never come across as vengeful in the way Kevin Rudd does. I'm a bit surprised to think he'd be the leaker.All the signs now point to Tanner as being Oakes's mole.
Tanner is an out and out Rudd supporter though, and has nothing to lose by leaking considering he is leaving parliament.Do they? Can you say what these signs are? Lindsay Tanner has never come across as vengeful in the way Kevin Rudd does. I'm a bit surprised to think he'd be the leaker.
Tanner is an out and out Rudd supporter though, and has nothing to lose by leaking considering he is leaving parliament.
It is common knowledge that Tanner's early departure was triggered by Gillard's ascendancy. It is also common knowledge that he and Gillard can't stand a bar of each other.
He was also probably fed up with the nauseating Swan, knowing that he would have done a better job. Rudd had to give the Treasury to Swan, against his better judgment, for his his help in betraying Beasley.
Latham said Rudd and Swan couldn't stand each other either. Politics makes strange bed fellows.
Swan had that much dirt on Rudd from Queensland state Government days that Rudd had to appoint him as Treasurer. Rudd would dearly liked to have got rid of Swan, but was too scared.
Machievelli would suggest Swan is the leaker then, help destroy Rudd, knowing this might take out Tanner, then hope Gillard loses and blows up, then Swan can arise from the wreckage and pick up the pieces:
Some interesting hypotheses so far. I wonder if we'll ever know.
Bill Shorten is frequently referred to as the next leader. He doesn't seem like leadership material to me. Why would he be considered the most likely?
He doesn't have any real presence or charisma, is quite hesitant in discussion, and makes me think of a back office clerk.
Fast forward to the events of nearly five weeks ago in Canberra, when Rudd fell to Julia Gillard. Arbib, a senator and a junior minister in Rudd's government, was again at the centre of the action, rustling up numbers for the coup.
His was not the only hand holding a knife, of course. Other chieftains from Labor's right - particularly Bill Shorten, David Feeney, and Don Farrell - were prime movers. And Rudd's autocratic style had left him ripe for the toppling. Nevertheless, Arbib's role in Rudd's downfall was ''pre-eminent'', according to one of Arbib's mates, Senator Glenn Sterle, from Western Australia.
''Let's make no mistake: Mark put Kevin here [as leader] in the first place, which is why to take him out was a bloody big call,'' the plain-spoken former truckie says. ''It's like taking your granddad out.''
Has anybody spotted the difference between Joolya last week to Joolya this week?
I thought so too. And it quite throws Ms Gillard off balance when she realises her charm act just isn't cutting it.She was no different with Kerry O'Brien last night. She was still using her girlish charm and throaty chuckle.
Kerry on the other hand was different and didn't succumb to her wiles.
Inevitably there's going to be the conclusion drawn that prior to the 'real Julia' daringly being put on show, what we were seeing before was some sort of machine driven cardboard cutout.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?