Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Defending Brett Kavanaugh



A couple of brave Spartacus aren't they.

They should really see what the Romans did to all the Spartacuses.

Only difference is that this time, history won't look upon them as freedom fighters, just a couple of paid tools.
 
"In response, an aide to Democrats on the Judiciary Committee reportedly unloaded on Senate Republicans: "Republicans are flailing," the aide said, according to NBC News. "They are desperately trying to muddy the waters. ... Twelve hours before the hearing they suggest two anonymous men claimed to have assaulted her. Democrats were never informed of these assertions in interviews, in violation of Senate rules."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.amp.html
 
Bahahaha Grasshopper!

...and another big dollop of irony. :laugh::laugh::laugh:

So two guys are now claiming they rape girls... the one that got away was Dr. Ford? Maybe, they can't be sure... because they did it to so many girls?

So if we read up on Kavanaugh's diary, we can see where he was and what he was doing that day.

anyway... aren't there a bunch of other azzholes the GOP can pick who will rule the same way, just happen to not be a sexual predator?
 
Well how special is that ! Suddenly it appears a couple of guys front up to say they were the ones who assaulted Christine Ford in 1982. How brilliantly noble and fortutitous. All we need now is a couple more volunteers to take the rap to make sure there are sufficient options. I really hope they can offer some proof they were at the party - like anyone else who remembers them ?

Perhaps they could also tell us about the punch spiking and sex train assaults that Julie Spectwick has described.

That is certainly amazing. Looks as if they will have to supoena Mark Judge and get to the bottom of this.
Bring on the popcorn.
 
If two people come forward confessing to raping young girls, doesn't that warrant Police involvement.
Two more Trump campaign members done for lying under oath.
 
No moral high ground here for the Repubs they won't call all witnesses or investigate, all carefully controlled such is the corruption and fraud (sadly including the religious right)in the US political appointments.

Kavanaugh hung out with a group who were involved in heavy binge drinking and gang rape even Clinton would blush at that.
 
Wayne and Tisme, you two haven't made any Calls to the U.S. over the last few days have you?
I know Mo wouldn't do something like that!
 
So ? The real person to talk to is Mark Judge.

I will be very surprised if he doesn't get a supoena at some stage whether he wants to speak or not.
And how do the memories of Mark Judges girlfriend sit with you in this situation?
Personal opinion is that this is a last minute smear job on Kavanaugh by the dems. Not the first, second, or third time democrats have flat out lied about a situation either.
The "not Kavanaugh" protesters are some of the biggest lying shtbags, trying to push their goal home. Nothing is beyond them.

But like I said before- not much evidence.

All the witnesses have denied. Ford has changed details from her polygraph and there seems to be a few lies. Wheres her family in this?
Surely a family member would have had some clue.

I think they are trying to link Kavanaugh to mark judges behavior. I have a feeling judge was knee deep in the allegations.

But like I said you need credible evidence to really decide. Not loons coming out of the woodwork.
 
Julie Swetnick had a restraining order filed against her by her ex boyfriend. I'm sure more stuff will come out.
"Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,”. "I know a lot about her. ... She’s not credible at all. Not at all."

None of their "witnesses" seem to back any of them.

Fords apparent friend at the time. Who she placed at the party with her and Kavanaugh said it didn't happen and she never met Kavanaugh in her life.
 
The "I'm on a boat"Jeff Catalan sexual assault accusation was recanted after the sht bag thought twice about it.
But goes to show that the crazies are coming forward with bs accounts.
 
Christine Blasey Ford’s Opening Statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee
On Thursday, the woman accusing the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her while the two were in high school will testify before a panel of lawmakers.

On Thursday, the California professor Christine Blasey Ford will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the sexual-assault allegations she’s leveled against the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. Ford’s claim, that Kavanaugh assaulted her at a party while the two were in high school, became public on September 16, though she’d sent a confidential letter detailing the alleged incident to Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein in July. Kavanaugh has denied the accusations.

Below, the full text of Ford’s prepared written testimony.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...atement-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court/571366/
 
Brett Kavanaugh’s Prepared Remarks to the Senate Judiciary Committee
The Supreme Court nominee will testify Thursday about the sexual-assault allegations against him, which he “categorically and unequivocally” denies.

Madeleine CarlisleOlivia Paschal Sep 26, 2018
lead_720_405.jpg

Jacquelyn Martin / AP

On the eve of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the sexual-assault allegations against the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the panel released his opening remarks. Kavanaugh will say that he “categorically and unequivocally” denies the accusations made by Christine Blasey Ford, a California professor. Ford, who claims Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her while the two were in high school, will also testify on Thursday.

Below is Kavanaugh’s prepared written testimony, as submitted to the committee.
 
Who is Julie Swetnick, the third Kavanaugh accuser?


Michael E. Miller ,
Steve Hendrix ,
Jessica Contrera and
Ian Shapira
September 26 at 9:54 PM
Julie Swetnick, who Wednesday became the third woman to accuse Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, is an experienced Web developer in the Washington area who has held multiple security clearances for her work on government-related networks.

The child of two government bureaucrats — her father worked on the lunar orbiter for NASA and her mother was a geologist at the Atomic Energy Commission — has spent most of her life around Washington. Now 55, she grew up in Maryland and graduated in 1980 from Gaithersburg High School, located in a far less affluent section of the same county where Kavanaugh lived and attended an exclusive prep school.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...b1e46bb3bc7_story.html?utm_term=.a7d4db1bccf0
 
Who is Julie Swetnick, the third Kavanaugh accuser?


Michael E. Miller ,
Steve Hendrix ,
Jessica Contrera and
Ian Shapira
September 26 at 9:54 PM
Julie Swetnick, who Wednesday became the third woman to accuse Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, is an experienced Web developer in the Washington area who has held multiple security clearances for her work on government-related networks.

The child of two government bureaucrats — her father worked on the lunar orbiter for NASA and her mother was a geologist at the Atomic Energy Commission — has spent most of her life around Washington. Now 55, she grew up in Maryland and graduated in 1980 from Gaithersburg High School, located in a far less affluent section of the same county where Kavanaugh lived and attended an exclusive prep school.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...b1e46bb3bc7_story.html?utm_term=.a7d4db1bccf0

Ex-boyfriend filed restraining order against third Kavanaugh accuser

By MARC CAPUTO and NATASHA KORECKI


09/26/2018 08:05 PM EDT

Julie Swetnick, the woman who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and a friend of attending house parties where women — including herself — were sexually assaulted, had a restraining order filed against her years later in Miami by her former boyfriend.

A Miami-Dade County court docket shows a petition for injunction against Swetnick was filed March 1, 2001, by her former boyfriend, Richard Vinneccy, who told POLITICO Wednesday the two had dated for four years before they broke up.



Thirteen days later, the case was dismissed, not long after an affidavit of non-ability to advance fees was filed.

According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”

"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”


Swetnick was identified on Wednesday by Avenatti, who produced a sworn statement asserting that she met Kavanaugh in the 1980-1981 time period and subsequently attended more than 10 house parties where she said Kavanaugh and a close friend of his, Mark Judge, attended.

Swetnick does not accuse Kavanaugh himself of sexually assaulting her in the sworn statement. But she asserts Kavanaugh was present when she was the victim of a “gang rape” by multiple boys at one party.

Vinneccy made clear that he did not believe her story.

“I have a lot of facts, evidence, that what she’s saying is not true at all,” he said. “I would rather speak to my attorney first before saying more."

Avenatti said called the reporting “outrageous” and accused the press of “digging into the past” of a woman who stepped forward and is willing to testify under oath.

“I am disgusted by the fact that the press is attacking a sexual assault victim,” Avenatti said.

When asked if the allegation of a restraining order were true, Avenatti said: “I don’t know one way or another,” adding he would research it further.

Avenatti previously said he had vetted the client and in a sworn statement, she said she still held government clearances.
 
Top