This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Defending Brett Kavanaugh

https://www.theepochtimes.com/senat...rral-for-third-kavanaugh-accuser_2676876.html

"
Senator Bill Cassidy (R-Md.) called for referring Julie Swetnick—who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct—to the FBI and Justice Department (DOJ) for criminal investigation on Oct. 2.

“A criminal referral should be sent to the FBI/DOJ regarding the apparently false affidavit signed by Julie Swetnick that was submitted to the Senate,” Cassidy tweeted....(cont) "
 
Sorry, I did not read all 15 pages on this thread, but I just wanted to add my two cents.
Regardless of whether he did it or not, whether it can be justified to his youth or his state of inebriation, my main concern is his demeanour during the hearing. He was much too emotional angry and disrespectful to members on the council, his answers were emotional and incoherent at times. A Supreme Judge must be able to deal with difficult situations, remain their composure and treat everyone with respect. Based on the strange replies to simple questions, his ability to objectively hold such a position power is questionable. There are many more conservative judges that might be better suited for the position than Kavanaugh, and the undying support for this particular individual baffles me, especially in light of his recent behaviour. Not the allegations, his actual behaviour which can be seen during the hearing.
 
He came across as I suspect he is, a wining little spoiled Yale wanker....
 
He came across as I suspect he is, a wining little spoiled Yale wanker....

I'm not sure we (ASF) should be defending or prosecuting him, but it is a story that has the opportunity to translate into Oz ....it seems to me that whatever the US does we follow like puppy dogs.

Brett may well strip away women's rights, workers rights, etc and all it takes here is another Abbott to use that as excuse. Similarly if unsubstantiated claims by women are considered fact ....well males are open season.
 
Similarly if unsubstantiated claims by women are considered fact ....well males are open season.

That's the point of the FBI investigation I suppose, as abbreviated as it is, to substantiate the allegations or not.
 
Donald Trump went full frontal on Dr Christine Blasey Ford at his rally last night.
Mocked her senseless. Got the crowd roaring. Trashed her testimony.
Decried the effect on Brett Kavanaugh life.
"A man's life is in tatters. A man's life is shattered"

And he does this while the FBI is investigating the range of claims and issues surrounding Judge Kavanaughs fitness to be a Supreme Court nominee.

And while in the wings at least three critical Republicians Party Senators are considering how they will vote on Judge Kavanaugh.

What an epic troll.

Trump’s mockery of Christine Blasey Ford perpetuates rape culture
The president just sent survivors the message that their accounts are worthy of ridicule.
https://www.vox.com/2018/10/3/17932024/trump-brett-kavanaugh-christine-ford-julie-swetnick
 

Trump is suck a azzhole isn't he.

If a person know anything about the subject matter Trump's one about, they'd either be laughing or just dropping their jaw at the bs that come out of his mouth.

I mean, we all know he's a pathological liar but man... he just make shiet up like no one was watching or hearing or knowing anything. And somehow he's getting away with it.
 
Ford's testimony is chock full of cavernous holes and is not credible. If you can't see it was a Democrat fit up...

Well, you're a bloody idiot. Come now Komrades, surely you can see that deep in your heart of hearts?
 
Ford's testimony is chock full of cavernous holes and is not credible. If you can't see it was a Democrat fit up...

Well, you're a bloody idiot. Come now Komrades, surely you can see that deep in your heart of hearts?
Your totally and utterly delusional Wayne.

Dr Christine Blasey Ford never suggested she had a perfect memeory of the night of her assault. She was absolutely clear however that she was assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh and his mate. Why was this part of her memory so clear ?

Because this part of the evening was and truly burned into her memory. And if you chose to read her response to the questioning she gave an expert witnesses analysis of how that happened.

This event scarred her life. It came up when she and her husband were renovating their home a number of years ago and she demanded another door be put into the house as an alternative exit. It was at that stage she told him of the assault.
She told her therapist of the assault many years ago. This is on the record.
If you want to look for "cavernous holes in testimony" how about asking if Brett Kavanaugh was the honourable virgin choir boy he claimed he was on oath. Have a look at the number of contemperaries who saw a mean drunk.
Anyway the issue I raised was Donald Trump using a public rally to mock and belittle Dr Ford. But he wasn'tmocking her was he Wayne ?

He was telling any and every other would be woman assault victim to shut-the-xuck-up because we will destroy you. You won't be believed no matter what you say. And we will make your life hell on earth. In particular of course there are the 20 odd women who on the record have claimed Donald Trump assaulted them. Yep they are all liars.

And he wants the Republician senators to swallow this behaviour and install his own personal sock puppet to the Supreme Court. A Judge who has already followed his masters voice and can be expected to be as partial, as brutal and as dishonest as the President who picked him for the position.

This is where we are going.
 
Bas, I invite you to read, listen analyse outside if the Vox/Gaurdian bubble.

The woman's (and other so called accusers) is not credible in any sense as evidence. It's a fit up pure and simple, everybody except you postpodern SJWs admit it, and he will be sworn in.

Similarly, if there is a decent investigation, several Dems should go to prison.
 
If not, I nominate God...

Except, damn, he got angry once and flooded the joint... well more than once, poor old Sodam and Gomorrah, just trying to have a bit of LGBTXYZ fun.

Can't have God, can we.
 
Wayne, your so full of yourself. Even the republicans said she seemed credible. I agree that democrats would have taken advantage of that, but the odds are certainly in her favor as the victim and kav being the pig...perhaps you've been around horses too long mate? I would have thought spotting a horses arse would be easy for you.
 
Last edited:
I stand by my comments and I refuse to play the ad hominem game that you arw trying to play canoz.
 
Ford's testimony is chock full of cavernous holes and is not credible. If you can't see it was a Democrat fit up...

Well, you're a bloody idiot. Come now Komrades, surely you can see that deep in your heart of hearts?

No it's not. I've seen a fair chunk of her testimony.

His is just full of bs.

Apparently he might also be in trouble for lying to the Senate about when he heard of the second alleged victim. It's not in the news as he said but a couple of weeks before where he, we're told, call up his pals to say that he didn't do it, alright, wink wink.

Anyway, this is all a joke. A drunken douche with plenty of evidence about teenage drinking, hard partying is being accused of attempted rape, sexual assault but... but that's all in the past, it's he said she said so let's go ahead and vote to appoint him to the highest court in the land, for life anyway.

One Senator said no... so alright, the FBI got 1 week and here's the list of who they can talk to.

You'd think that if they care for truth and justice they'd let the FBI take as long as is needed. Follow the trial where it leads. But nah...
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...