Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Defending Brett Kavanaugh

Thatis wrong, disgusting, and profoundly ####ing stupid. Yes, you clowns truly disgust me and you have no idea if the can of worms you have opened.

Can I meet you half way and we'll just blame Bas and her anti peni views?

But in all seriousness, if someone came to me and said "that Wayne, he cuddles Sheep". Then a second independent person, a third, then a fourth. Then if Donald Trump came out and said "that Wayne, he doesn't cuddle Sheep", I'd pretty much take that as five pieces of evidence leading me to say "Wayne probably cuddles Sheep!"
 
Due process, brah. It's how we do it in the West, Grasshopper. (unless your brownshirts manage to destroy that)

Every Judge under any regime you care to name got there after "due process". They also execute and hang people following their interpretation of the law too.
 
Can I meet you half way and we'll just blame Bas and her anti peni views?

But in all seriousness, if someone came to me and said "that Wayne, he cuddles Sheep". Then a second independent person, a third, then a fourth. Then if Donald Trump came out and said "that Wayne, he doesn't cuddle Sheep", I'd pretty much take that as five pieces of evidence leading me to say "Wayne probably cuddles Sheep!"

All my asshole kiwi mates, accuse me of cuddling sheep. Ironic, because it is a known fact that all Kiwis do in fact, cuddle sheep.
 
Every Judge under any regime you care to name got there after "due process". They also execute and hang people following their interpretation of the law too.
Thank you.

According to any fair interpretation of the law, Kav seemingly has no case to answer.

The Marxists however, have seemingly left themself open to civil litigation.

Really dumb game plan
 
Thank you.

According to any fair interpretation of the law, Kav seemingly has no case to answer.

The Marxists however, have seemingly left themself open to civil litigation.

Really dumb game plan

When a person is being accused of a crime such as rape, I'm pretty sure "due process" calls for a case to be filed, the investigators called in and start asking questions of everyone and everything.

Here, all that's been done is the few Senators' staffer called in the accused, ask them to swear to God if they attempted rape or not.

No we didn't.

Alright then. Case close. :rolleyes:


Call it prejudice if you want but I rather take the word of a psychology professor over a career lawyer who twist the law to allow torture.

Maybe the lady made it all up since she claimed it happened. With school mates recalling she "disappear" socially, withdrawn and not herself. And oh, she made it up by seeking counselling and telling her psychiatrist about it.

But she's a liar because there's no "knock out punch"; her psychiatrist wrote "four boys" instead of the "two boys" as she claim.

Well, she said this... he said that... and he got a diary to prove it. So who knows... let's move along and vote to appoint him a lifetime Justice.
 
Don't the English speaking world take each other's laws and precedents as guidelines and models... sometimes?

Not really. The all share the common law system, but that's about as far as the similarities go. In any event, this isn't a court of law, it's a senate hearing. (a point which seems to be getting lost in all this discussion about due process and innocent until guilty).

That and what's decided in the US affects the world.

The US judiciary, and its appointment process, has little importance outside the US.
 
Last edited:
. In any event, this isn't a court of law, it's a senate hearing. (a point which seems to be getting lost in all this discussion about due process and innocent until guilty).
.
Exactly, and we know how the vote will go.
 
American Bar Association requests to delay Brett Kavanaugh vote until FBI investigates

The American Bar Association late Thursday urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to delay the vote to confirm Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh pending a full FBI investigation, according to multiple reports.

In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein, the organization requested the committee hold off on voting until allegations made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and others can be fully vetted by the FBI.
“We make this request because of the ABA’s respect for the rule of law and due process under law,” the letter read. “The basic principles that underscore the Senate’s constitutional duty of advice and consent on federal judicial nominees require nothing less than a careful examination of the accusations and facts by the FBI.”

Ford, a California professor, accused the federal judge of sexually assaulting her more than three decades ago.
The organization said the decision behind an appointment for the Supreme Court is “simply too important to rush to a vote,” while proceeding without an additional investigation would not only impact the Senate’s reputation, but “negatively affect the great trust necessary for the American people to have in the Supreme Court.”

“It must remain an institution that will reliably follow the law and not politics,” the letter stated.
The Huffington Post posted a copy of the letter to Twitter. Fox News emailed and called the ABA and did not immediately receive comment.
In August, the association rated Kavanaugh as a well-qualified candidate for the nation’s highest court -- their highest rating. It issued the recommendation before the allegations were made public.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. cited the association’s comments during an intense moment during Thursday’s hearing that featured testimony from both Kavanaugh and Ford on the allegations.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...tt-kavanaugh-vote-until-fbi-investigates.html
 
Not really. The all share the common law system, but that's about as far as the similarities go. In any event, this isn't a court of law, it's a senate hearing. (a point which seems to be getting lost in all this discussion about due process and innocent until guilty).

The US judiciary, and its appointment process, has little importance outside the US.

Being a Supreme Court Judge he would rule on, say, US presidential (war) power... decide on US multinationals and the impact of their operations outside the US.

There are cases from victims of US corporations operating in Indonesia suing them under him... he told them to bugger off because this and that.
 
Not really. The all share the common law system, but that's about as far as the similarities go. In any event, this isn't a court of law, it's a senate hearing. (a point which seems to be getting lost in all this discussion about due process and innocent until guilty).

.

Throwing around accusations no matter where you are should involve some evidence. Its fcuking ridiculous to say "not a court of law, so lets just accept made up sht".

Mitt Romney was accused of not paying tax for 10 years. After he lost the guy making the accusation admitted it was a lie and said "well he lost", so it worked.

Bill "rapey" mcshorten will be sweating it if this is the direction we are going.
 
Throwing around accusations no matter where you are should involve some evidence. Its fcuking ridiculous to say "not a court of law, so lets just accept made up sht".

Mitt Romney was accused of not paying tax for 10 years. After he lost the guy making the accusation admitted it was a lie and said "well he lost", so it worked.

Bill "rapey" mcshorten will be sweating it if this is the direction we are going.

Cmon Mo. If someone attacks your property or Family and you're the only witness are you going to remain quiet?

Even so, there's four independent accussers, make it five if Trump's reference counts against Kav.
 
Being a Supreme Court Judge he would rule on, say, US presidential (war) power... decide on US multinationals and the impact of their operations outside the US.

There are cases from victims of US corporations operating in Indonesia suing them under him... he told them to bugger off because this and that.

Considering all the "Democrats are scum" talk, he's not fit to be a Supreme Court Judge ruling on matters between Republicans and Democrats.
 
.
Cmon Mo. If someone attacks your property or Family and you're the only witness are you going to remain quiet?

Even so, there's four independent accussers, make it five if Trump's reference counts against Kav.
And their witnesses at this stage denied.
The others are not exactly credible. Ford has put the best case forward(with zero evidence.

The dems literally sat on the information during the confirmation hearings and then tried to delay. You have protesters outside prior to the rape accusations. Who would do anything to tear down kav. They believe he will reverse abortion laws so will do anything for the greater good.

Theres plenty of motives.


Pretty sure I'd bash on sight, or call the police. Not wait a few decades till the perpetrator became a high court judge. And then pinged him in the final days of confirmation. Plus I'd forget where the crime scene was and call witnesses that said it didn't happen.

Anyway reps are screwed on confirmation now. They would be better to rush an investigation and try and win midterms. Trying to expose dems lies in the process. Gop base want kav in though so its a tough call.

If kav gets in they will tear down whats left of Obamas legacy.
 
Look, if all this is a conspiracy I'll gladly admit being wrong and enjoy watching the perpetrators brought to account. I'll personally offer to publicly flog the offenders.
Just seems too much going against it atm.
 
Look, if all this is a conspiracy I'll gladly admit being wrong and enjoy watching the perpetrators brought to account. I'll personally offer to publicly flog the offenders.
Just seems too much going against it atm.

Ah a Democratic conspiracy. To believe this you have to believe a 53 year upper class Republician family College professor had to construct a story about her abuse by Brett Kavanaugh and tell her therapist and husband in 2012 way before he was ever in the frame for a Supreme Court position.
She then had to expose herself to a million rabid haters and being slandered as a liar just for saying what had happened to her as teenager.
And why did she do it ? Because in her heart she believes the Amercian public should know a critical element of the character of this new Supreme Court judge who will swing the court for years to come.

And there are at least two other independent people who allege they have experienced assaults by Brett Kavanaugh. At least one has said she has other people who will corroroborate her story

And despite these allegations the Senate committe will not make any further inquiries but wants to immediately vote Brad Kavanaugh into office.
 
I take it you never have much experience recalling an attempted rape when you were 15. Doing it in front of cameras, wrinkled old men, and a nice lady lawyer representing them.

Why can't they all be like Brett. Confident, manly, flippant, likes beer and alcohol so much he blacks out a fair few time... what? doesn't everybody?

but of course not too manly as he kept a diary and goes teary... praying for Dr. Ford :rolleyes:

She would have been schooled for weeks to provide theatre.... her acting was abysmal.
 
She would have been schooled for weeks to provide theatre.... her acting was abysmal.

His was Oscar worthy though.

Saw a few clips of his responses. What a di[k.

Coaching his kids football was the most important thing to him... booohuu huu... now he can't do it anymore [because parents will freaking not trust me with their kids]... booo hu hu.

If coaching football is the most important thing in your life, why are you a lawyer, working hard to become a judge? Natural talent too good to waste or what?

Talk about crocodile tears, using his kids innocence.

And oh... I like beer, don't you?

Yea azzhole, most people like a drink here and there. They don't get black out drunk so often their best friend wrote a book about it.


Seems everyday, the saintly imperial veneer of justice, equality, mediocrity... loses a piece.
 
Top