- Joined
- 17 January 2013
- Posts
- 144
- Reactions
- 0
since alvin wont do the maths, i have got my fag packet out again and according to it his AAPL trade involves $2.7m worth of stock , so at 10% margin he has put up $270k to win $3660. Cool. By the way how often does AAPl close up by more than 6.7% over a week? You have a figure for that right Alvin?
Realistically we should no longer entertain discussions like this on the forum, as this has become a pointless loop like all the other threads on "wealth schemes" which we see here so often. In our politeness we have more than once given these people a platform they don't deserve on a forum like ASF.
The policy should be that any claims made about returns for a commercially offered product require immediate verification by a moderator, or the user is banned as a spruiker and the product immediately added to an ASF "Scam Alert" thread. At which point if the operators of the product feel they are being defamed, simply require to provide verified performance statements and a retraction from the list issued.
Last month, the New Zealand Consumers' Institute wrote an article about one of Phil's pals – a guy called Daniel Kertcher. Phil had been urging consumers to attend Daniel's seminars on how to get rich trading options. Kertcher's magical share techniques were even more impressive than Phil Jones's magical property techniques. "The challenge is to turn two grand into a million," said Kertcher.
Phew, no wonder Phil Jones, with his passion to help consumers, was encouraging people to pay thousands to Kertcher.
But the Consumers' Institute were, to put it mildly, rather critical of Kertcher, not just for his share trading activities, but for his past property activities. In a 2001 headline which screamed Watch out for these people, the Consumers' Institute featured a photo of Kertcher together with a story about how he ripped-off an elderly man on one of his many dodgy Gold Coast apartment deals. In this example, the 69 year-old lost $86,000.
The Consumers Institute does an excellent job informing the public about dubious investment schemes.
Queensland-based Daniel Kertcher, who is trying to target New Zealand sharemarket investors, has been mentioned several times.
Consumer, the institute's magazine, says Mr Kertcher promoted overvalued Queensland properties to New Zealanders and many of these investors have lost large sums of money on their purchases.
Mr Kertcher is a former director of Metashare International, the company that promotes the Metashare share-trading system. The Consumers Institute is sceptical about the performance of this expensive system.
Mr Kertcher is now fronting get rich quick sharemarket seminars in Auckland that are independent of Metashare.
One this evening is on how to make money on the sharemarket and a subsequent three-day session is on share and options trading. This evening's seminar costs $89.95 and the three-day session is priced at $3490 a person.
Mr Kertcher is promoting a high-risk options strategy based on the Australian Stock Exchange. This is an extremely difficult strategy to master, even for investors with long experience of equity markets.
I am sure there would have been some complaints lodged with ASIC. And ASIC would certainly have investigated. But it seems that no action was ever taken against Daniel Kertcher. Could it be that it was found that the complaints did not warrant prosecution? I can only guess.
This thread has been running for more than two years and a few people have already mentioned that it may be time to close it down. They may have a point, but I'll leave it to the moderators.
Bye the way, the March Options expired this morning, and while not everyone of Daniel's trades was profitable, the large majority of them were and the total return of all trades for March was at the rate of about 30 % p.a.
How is ASIC any different to a Consumer Institute?
ASIC are well known for being under resourced and stretched to the limit, so it is entirely possible that they cannot cover everything int he financial realm. When have ASIC every had a successful prosecution either? They are hamstrung by inefficient laws and under staffing
wayne_L, we all know that you are a tool, but you are not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?
What is unsubstantiated about those trades that I was telling you as I was putting them on and carried them through to their successful conclusion?
Nothing unsubstantiated about that, nothing at all.
Bye the way, your bias is showing.
And, I don't have to prove a thing, not a darned thing.
And I am not trying to convince you of anything, because obviously you are too thick to understand.
Nothing can harm my monthly profits, they keep rolling in month after month whether you know about it or not.
I have already shown you two trades that I put on recently - from the day I put them on until their successful conclusion. There is nothing retrospective about it.
30 % p.a. is very achievable. Just because you can't get those returns doesn't mean others can't. Many of us do.
Yep, I really don't understand how anyone can consciously and morally claim such things without laying the detail out. I sincerely hope no one on ASF is gullible enough to believe a word of such claims without their own due dilligence. While this thread is slightly entertaining, its value lies in unmasking Alvin as one of ASFs greatest.Monthly profits, month after month, giving 30% pa , year after year, are difficult if not impossible to believe.
Show some proof and substantiation.
Otherwise I consider you to be a fantasist.
gg
Yep, I really don't understand how anyone can consciously and morally claim such things without laying the detail out. I sincerely hope no one on ASF is gullible enough to believe a word of such claims without their own due dilligence. While this thread is slightly entertaining, its value lies in unmasking Alvin as one of ASFs greatest.
How does DK not being mentioned in ASIC negate the other information about his past conduct?So, is that the best you can do?
Consumers Institute of New Zealand.
What a toothless tiger!
They, who are making an annual loss at the expense of the NZ taxpayer, mention Daniel Kertcher once: Under "Scams" - Daniel Kertcher trading options.
And that's it?
No follow up, no details? No prosecution - nothing, nada, zilch, nix. Ten years of nothing.
What a bunch of bureaucratic nohopers, being a drain on the taxpayer.
Then: The NZ Herald.
Don't get me started on journalists. There must me a reason why journalists are way down on the list of trusted persons, down there somewhere near last place with used car salesmen and drug dealers.
As we have seen recently some journalists will stoop to anything to sell newspapers. Nuff said.
So, that leaves ASIC as the only credible authority. As we have seen, and has been pointed out by several people here, ASIC take their job very serious, start investigating when a complaint is made and take proper action in the courts when prosecutions are warranted. They have a very good record of achieving results, exposing scams, issuing warnings and putting the guilty away.
So, what actions have ASIC taking against Daniel Kertcher?
I am sure there would have been some complaints lodged with ASIC. And ASIC would certainly have investigated. But it seems that no action was ever taken against Daniel Kertcher. Could it be that it was found that the complaints did not warrant prosecution? I can only guess.
This thread has been running for more than two years and a few people have already mentioned that it may be time to close it down. They may have a point, but I'll leave it to the moderators.
Bye the way, the March Options expired this morning, and while not everyone of Daniel's trades was profitable, the large majority of them were and the total return of all trades for March was at the rate of about 30 % p.a.
If you are considering purchasing the Daniel Kertcher/Platinum Pursuits system please read the above excellent post. You will see that he is listed under scams.Thanks Samuel for that link. Inside was a dead hyperlink to consumer.org.nz, so I did some digging.
From the 2003 Annual Report of "Consumers Institute of New Zealand"
View attachment 51280
page 5
See for yourself: http://www.consumer.org.nz/content/uploads/Image/PDFs/annualreport2003.pdf
If you are considering purchasing the Daniel Kertcher/Platinum Pursuits system please read the above excellent post.Anyone got an archive copy of this article?
http://www.jenman.com.au/news_item.php?id=153
also referenced here
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/personal-finance/news/article.cfm?c_id=12&objectid=228205
or this one from 2004
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=3551109
.
I think it is extremely apparent that Daniel Kertcher is a very successful, long time con artist. I am almost tempted to post a link to this thread on 4chan just to see what Anonymous would do about it. Mr Kertcher, I suggest you take your sock puppets and leave this forum for good, lest my temptation grow further.
If you are considering purchasing the Daniel Kertcher/Platinum Pursuits system please read the above excellent post.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?