And if the produce sold in Australia were dangerous to eat, wouldn't our H&S watchdogs be barking the house down?
I don't trust the authorities to tell me what's safe to eat and what isn't. Check out Monsantos soy beans, GMO foods etc. Even the stuff they put in our water is toxic.
Not wanting to derail the thread, but show me a single scientific study showing any downside to 'monsanto' (or any other) soy beans or GMO foods.
Not even going to bother with the toxic water.
Scientific studies are for the right-hand side of the IQ Bell curve.
Social media blogs are spreading conspiracy theories to the other half.
New Beeotic from Capilano is the world’s first clinically tested prebiotic honey. It helps boost your digestive health, is 100% natural Australian honey, and is now available in the honey section of leading supermarkets and pharmacies. *
This premium quality honey provides a natural source of prebiotics with the same delicious Capilano taste. Beeotic has clinically shown to improve the good-to-bad bacteria ratio in your gut by:*
Nourishing beneficial bacteria:*
Increases the good Lactobacillus
Increases the good Bifidobacteria
Suppressing bad bacteria:*
Reduces Clostridium
New product on the shelf, apparently is a world first, capilano adding to their consumer honey market by adding higher value medicinal products to their range.
http://capilano.com.au/au/our-range/beeotic/40/a-world-first
View attachment 68232
Chemist warehouse have it in stock if you are interested.
http://www.chemistwarehouse.com.au/buy/80641/Capilano-Beeotic-Prebiotic-Honey-260ml
...
I've been buying.
Thanks VC. So is this essentially like adding a teaspoon of Yakult to the honey? Looks interesting... Not sure if it will significantly add to the revenue though
Without the selling speech: more like adding a teaspoon of sugars so it will feed your pre existing gut flora.Thanks VC. So is this essentially like adding a teaspoon of Yakult to the honey? Looks interesting... Not sure if it will significantly add to the revenue though
Without the selling speech: more like adding a teaspoon of sugars so it will feed your pre existing gut flora.
The human body is an ecosystem, and CZZ tries to capture the trends attached to that understanding;
Will see what the commercial success is: trend is the word so if it catches, could be good for the SP.
Disclaimer:
I do not own nor work for CZZ
VC, it is clear you are biased cf CZZ.No qldfrog, a prebiotic is not simply sugar, it's a non digestible plant fibre that acts as food for good gut bacteria, not all honey has high levels of it.
I'm also not convinced (enough) that this would be a much more compelling purchase than regular honey. That's not to say others wouldn't buy it though.
No qldfrog, a prebiotic is not simply sugar, it's a non digestible plant fibre that acts as food for good gut bacteria, not all honey has high levels of it.
But, even if some prebiotic may be "non digestible plant fibre " how would you find: "non digestible plant fibre" in purified and filtered honey?
Sorry if this looks harsh but I am not happy with one liners like:"it's a non digestible plant fibre" which goes against all my knowledge of pollen purified honey: no fibre left as far as i know.
VC, it is clear you are biased cf CZZ.
I do not know if you are a owner (and I do not mean shareholder here) or work for them;
A quick browse thru the history on this thread made this clear:
#156 for example. People can make their own mind.
In itself, it is actually good to have a direct line to a listed company to ask questions, etc and i would question you directly if I had any need.
But, even if some prebiotic may be "non digestible plant fibre " how would you find: "non digestible plant fibre" in purified and filtered honey?
I was not attacking CZZ here was I?They are trying to tap a market of supplements/natural product and good on them.
Honey has a mix of sugars and even treated filtered and sterilised, these remain and have different, mostly beneficial good properties: slower absorbtion, etc [CZZ or not], and that could help your body.
That is true, fair and proven.
If this thread is a ramp thread tell me, but the idea is to share objective ideally impartial information, not company marketing.If I want to subscribe to the Pravda, I can do it knowingly.
Sorry if this looks harsh but I am not happy with one liners like:"it's a non digestible plant fibre" which goes against all my knowledge of pollen purified honey: no fibre left as far as i know.
If i am wrong , feel free to point me to proper material on non digestible plant fibre in purified honey and i would be happy to know it, as you know, i produce honey on a hobby manner and am a keen supporter of honey so my interest in CZZ.
Well they had return on equity of 14.6% for the 2013, that's not bad for that style of business.
Their capital is split between their property and plant ( about $19,000,000 ) and their inventory ( about $18,000,000)
the property and plant includes,
- the main packing facility in Brisbane which includes a packing building and a warehouse sitting on a large block of industrial land which they freehold and all the associated packing equipment.
- A secondary packing facility in perth, which they own all the equipment but rent the building under a lease
- a mothballed backup packing facility in Melbourne which they freehold,
the inventory include
- about 12months supply of bulk honey
- about 1 months supply of packed honey
There is currently about $4million dollars of excess Bulk honey inventory related to the purchase of the perth honey facility and brand "westco bee", Westco was a bee keepers co-op, and so bought more honey from the beekeepers than they could sell into the perth market, capillano will be able to move this easily so there will be a reduction in capital tied to this which will improve the figures from next year on.
They could get a higher return on assets if they sold the Brisbane packing shed and then rented it back on a long lease (like a lot of companies do) because real estate returns are lower than business returns in general, However I actually like the idea of having some of the capital exposed to industrial land and I think long term it will provide more stability.
they could also sell the mothballed Melbourne facility, they only kept it as a back up, but now the perth facility is running may end up being sold, this would reduce capital and increase the return on capital.
As far as historical returns, until about 2 years ago, capilano was a co-op, so it was more interested in buying as much honey as its members could produce and dumping it on the market rather than looking to produce high company profits, so the historical returns reflect that.
I see the competitive advantage being their brand and distribution channels, their low cost production and probably most importantly their relationship with the supplier bee keepers.
in regards to valuation, there are a few metrics that lead me to a valuation of a little over $5, as I said though my entry price was between $2.20 and $2.60 though because I like to have a decent margin of safety, the equity is currently $3.16 / share, so that provides a decent safety margin for me.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.