- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,649
- Reactions
- 24,554
Have you seen the size of England compared to Australia and the population density, have you seen how close the U.S was to the U.K?It wouldn't take long to set up and produce fuel from any number of our resources.
How much fuel did the Ukraine have before Russia invaded?
Have a look at the world map, what sort of military resources would China require to monitor all the oceans for enemy cargo ships, and then be able to send an attack force while defending their assets?
War is not as simple as some here believe it to be.
Australia may have only 2 weeks' worth of fuel, but that is for private use.
England, during the war, struggled with domestic fuel supplies. They managed.
Have you seen the size of England compared to Australia and the population density, have you seen how close the U.S was to the U.K?
I'm not trying to criticise, but really down here if there is a global conflict with China and Russia, I think it will be quite exciting for us.
Moving troops from one side of England to the other, is like moving troops from Sydney to Parkes, Sydney to the West Coast is 5 days and 4,000km for every transport vehicle.
War isn't simple, logistics and practicality is.
Ukraine is bordered by friendly countries, Australia is bordered by sea, minor difference is, shipping in fuel, rather than trucking it in.
But I do like your positive outlook, it is refreshing.
The other problem is of course, all our major fabrication work is done overseas, so the alternative fuel processing facility will be made where and with what? All our limited manufacturing will be diverted to military production, as happened in WW2 when we actually had some manufacturing.
As the German U-boat cordon around the nation began to bite, the British government initiated a campaign to make the most out of old materials. In a July 1940 broadcast, the first wartime Minister of Supply, Labour MP Herbert Morrison, implored: “I ask people to start now and save their paper, bones and scrap metal. In that way, we shall build up a great reserve of raw materials ready to be transformed into war materials.”The Waste that Helped Win the War
MILITARIA WARTIME SCRAP DRIVESFrom July 1940, the British people...www.keymilitary.com
and 2 have gum ball machines.The fleet has 6 submarines. 4 are running
That's solid gold right there...?It wouldn't take long to set up and produce fuel from any number of our resources.
You call me pessimistic, I call it realistic, but I do love your optimism.Just in case you didn't read my post correctly -
It wouldn't take long to set up and produce fuel from any number of our resources.How much fuel did the Ukraine have before Russia invaded?Have a look at the world map, what sort of military resources would China require to monitor all the oceans for enemy cargo ships, and then be able to send an attack force while defending their assets?War is not as simple as some here believe it to be.Australia may have only 2 weeks' worth of fuel, but that is for private use.England, during the war, struggled with domestic fuel supplies. They managed.
You are too pessimistic to be able to see solutions, thankfully you are not one of our generals or advisers.
The only thing I'm optimistic about, is that war wont break out, I dont think it will.
Like I said in an earlier post a war will break out at sometime, the recent post I was meaning not over Taiwan in the near future.I'll put a kangaroo on that. What's the time frame though? Within 100 years?
More backyard stuff .... from another side of the fence
Full throttle in neutral: China’s new security architecture for the Middle East
This report addresses two widely held beliefs about the nature of China’s engagement in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) that ought to be revisitedwww.atlanticcouncil.org
That's solid gold right there...?
You call me pessimistic, I call it realistic, but I do love your optimism.
The only thing I'm optimistic about, is that war wont break out, I dont think it will.
coal: while China is our biggest export destination, their own production is massive and we are really just a few % of their own resources,If we're talking major conflict here, we only have to stop oil, gas and coal delivery. If we were really going to go all in and take significant pain if it was that serious - iron ore as well. Yes, we'd go broke, but it's a card to be played if it was that serious. China probably has other avenues for these resources, but the US controls the Pacific and India/EU controls the Indian Ocean. No, not sustainable, but, we have the leavers.
Ukraine sorted that, and that was the US plan from the start wasn't it? Wipe out any potential EU resurgence..No mention of France and the UK in that which is interesting. They have considerable historical and current interests there and in conjunction with the US need a coordinated joint plan.
Have you seen what's involved with such a project?It wouldn't take long to set up and produce fuel from any number of our resources.
There are ways to make do and improvise sure.We would find a way, we would make do, we would continue on as we have through every major epidemic, war, and natural disaster.
Good evening Mr Frog. As one whose name was put into the hat for the Vietnam conflict (fortunately must have fallen out through a hole in the bottom) and a conflict I certainly didn't agree with. I would not want to see my grand kids being used as pawns in a China conflict.hopefully, we will avoid that:
while the US has pushed for war in Ukraine for more than 10y, I am not aware of them pushing one against China yet;
On the other side, well China has pushed for a HK style takeover for a while; their strawmen in Taiwan have still a serious base in various election;
It would be easier for them to play a ukrainian style push from within; Just wait for the next economic crash, may not have to wait long and see if China or the US will be able to help Taipei getting food on the table and work in the factories....And the deal is done
Would you die for Taiwan?Would you be ready to see your children grandchildren die for the island?
(I assume here you have decent family relations ;-)
Interesting chat, have all a great night
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.I have been a great believer in that if the buraucrats and government reps are so desperate to help then bloody well go yourselves. But I guess their response would "we are far to important to be physically invloved"
And another huge disadvantage the west has, especially here, is not only the loss of infrastructure and factories but maybe foremost the absence of skills: the engineers and scientists requiredHave you seen what's involved with such a project?
Even the likes of China take a few years to build such facilities from scratch.
Ukraine doesn't really count given the extent of Western support they're receiving one way or another. They're not producing fuel from newly built facilities, just bringing it in.
Bearing in mind the big problem with building fuel supplies is that you need fuel to run construction machinery. Without that, it all takes longer and requires more labour.
And another huge disadvantage the west has, especially here, is not only the loss of infrastructure and factories but maybe foremost the absence of skills: the engineers and scientists required
I somewhat doubt we will have Indians and Chinese ! graduates rushing in a case of conflict, nor do I think we can transform our cohort of social studies,PS, environmental engineers, media influencers and barista experts into the designers and operators of new refineries,steel mills ,furnaces and factories etc.we do have still a few electrical and civil engineers thanks to mining,but anything above building roads and bridges/ buildings will be mission impossible, not forgetting how long it will take to block the green red tapes and council state interferences
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?