Dona Ferentes
Pengurus pengatur
- Joined
- 11 January 2016
- Posts
- 16,368
- Reactions
- 22,349
and it's a "ditto" from meI assume it's the same person I have on ignore, for precisely the same reason.
I don't have the suspect on ignore but generally just ignore the musings as I'm, the only one who is right, no matter whatI assume it's the same person I have on ignore, for precisely the same reason.
Except of course your better halfI don't have the suspect on ignore but generally just ignore the musings as I'm, the only one who is right, no matter what
Mr Frog, ahhhhhh only a fool or idiot would go against the female version.Except of course your better half
I think you mis read my post if you think I was insinuating you were a criminal or was trying to insult you, try re-reading my post with a less cynical tone. I didn't say you were shifty, I said acting shifty, eg doing something that makes people question you.Legitimate transactions performed with legitimately acquired monies do not merit the interrogations to which I was subjected.
Those willing to operate outside the confines of the law are easily able to evade these processes, leaving the law-abiding members of society as the only people likely to be significantly impacted, hence my reason for considering cynicism to be truly warranted.
Just because one is committed to one's contrary viewpoint, does not entitle one to insinuate criminal or inappropriate behaviour, as such I find your post deeply offensive and potentially defamatory.
At this juncture, my commitment to free speech is the only thing preventing me from availing myself of the "ignore" facility of this forum.
I shall, however, be reserving my right not to engage with, or respond to, future insults.
And the moral of this extremely sad tale would have been to contact the bank in question for verification.Yet another example of the Banks having to plug holes for people getting scammed.
'I can't trust anything anymore': Woman loses 95-year-old mum's $1.6m life savings to scammers
It all started with a phone call from a well-spoken man who claimed he worked for a well-known bank. Now, Harriet has lost the proceeds from the sale of her widowed mother's home.www.abc.net.au
Harriet Spring remembers the first phone call, in November.
- In short: Harriet Spring fell for a sophisticated fixed-term deposit scam.
- Experts warn scams are now too complex for consumers to pick up on by themselves and they want banks to be liable for reimbursing customers.
- What's next? The government says it's working with the banks to tighten security but won't go down that route at the moment.
The man with the "posh British accent" on the other end introduced himself as "from ING" and asked if she was interested in good rates on fixed-term deposits.
"Nothing crazy, nothing too out of the ordinary," Mrs Spring said.
"So, I didn't think, 'that sounds too good to be true'."
In fact, it was perfect timing for the Canberra architect — an existing ING customer — who'd been driving to and from the NSW South Coast each weekend for months to prepare her 95-year-old mother's house for sale.
Her mother had moved into an aged care facility after a series of strokes left her "unable to walk or talk".
"It was the end of a very hard year, and this guy just made it so easy," Mrs Spring said.
After months of phone calls and correspondence that she said appeared legitimate, she handed over $1.6 million — her mother's life savings — to scammers.
The real ING bank was not involved in any part of the process.
Very true, I thought it best to move the article to the scam thread, but it is hard to stop people doing silly things.And the moral of this extremely sad tale would have been to contact the bank in question for verification.
We have for some time now, do not answer calls unless there is a name attached to it and e-mails are dispatched to the bin.
If we want or need anything we make the inquiry to someone behind a counter locally.
Mr sp I have always been of the opinion if I/we wanted to invest our hard earned, it would not be with an unknown bod contacting us.Very true, I thought it best to move the article to the scam thread, but it is hard to stop people doing silly things.
If I am moving a lot of money around, I make every attempt to do it in person at the institution, I trust very few people with my money it was too hard earned to be risking giving it away.
Are they going to pass those costs on to the cash users???from the AFR
Cash transporter Armaguard has sealed an agreement with the country’s largest banks and retailers to deliver the Linfox-controlled group an additional $50 million, assuring the distribution of bank notes and coins throughout the economy for at least a year.
A .... new agreement, finalised over the weekend, will provide additional funding for Armaguard for a year from 01 July and is expected to be submitted to the competition regulator for approval [today ].
Are they going to pass those costs on to the cash users???
It’s certainly shows that using cash isn’t free, it’s just subsidised heavily by other parts of the system.
It makes sense for remote areas to use digital, because most of the supplies they order are coming in from suppliers that are along way away.It was interesting in my travels recently. Cooktown area, as well as smaller communities with naught but a pub and a cafe. The first action when we bought was they didn't hold out a hand for cash but presented the EFTPOS terminal first off. Same in local retail stores. I had no difficulty with the payment process at all.
I have noticed in my neck of the woods where a high school is close by none of them seem to use cash in the supermarket but use their smartphones. Even those of my generation (70 yo+) tend to now use either debit cards or their phones.
I suspect, while there will still be cash used, it will become smaller and smaller as time progresses as we older people die and generations bought up with the digital world won't be bothered using cash very much.
up to 'super-elite' class absolutely , to the lesser 'upper levels' well that depends on if you can be controlled , in critical areasThe cynical part is your claim that maybe it’s part of some conspiracy to keep you from rising to a wealthier class.
up to 'super-elite' class absolutely , to the lesser 'upper levels' well that depends on if you can be controlled , in critical areas
god forbid you just crash in perforce of sheer wealth and influence of key levers , say the power or telecommunications networks ., and express unusual ideas in public
By that argument they are most at risk of digital outages. If you have cash it will circle the local economy a lot more than digital will.It makes sense for remote areas to use digital, because most of the supplies they order are coming in from suppliers that are along way away.
If you drive a $50 note to cook town, and use it to buy some beers, well now the pub has a $50 note in its till that it has to work out a way to get that note banked so it can pay the beer company in Brisbane, and even if there is a bank in cook town, travellers bringing cash would cause an accumulation of cash locally that needs to be trucked back to a city.
But if you pay digitally the money goes into their account automatically and they can pay their bill right away, no need to physically move cash around, which is expensive.
How? the same amount of cash will circulate regardless, I mean even if you pay cash the Pub will still need to bank it and pay their staff digitally, not many staff get paid cash except the tax dodgersIf you have cash it will circle the local economy a lot more than digital will.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?