Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,063
- Reactions
- 8,344
I get what you are saying, and agree digital purchases send money offshore, but so do cash purchases, because if people want an iPhone they are going to buy it regardless of whether they were paid in cash or not.No, you are not "thinking" very hard to support your argument. I was making an argument of the disadvantages of convenience tapping.Tap-and-go are about four times higher fees than EFTPOS by the way.
I'm not advocating for a return of cash. I'm saying "cash purchases stay in the local economy". Digitisation sends money offshore. Amazon, eBay, temu, shein, alibaba, etc all base their platforms around it.
People are more likely to save with cash. Know where they are at and know how much they spend. The primary beneficiaries of digital locally are generally supermarkets and restaurants/cafes. It's one of the reasons I went into restaurants given the trend of laz
Digitisation benefits are primarily of convenience due to the inherent laziness that's swept society. It does produce rampant consumerism for online behemoths.
I could argue that things like uber eats is another level of taking money from the economy.
Don't even get me started on kids buying "Robux" to buy digital clothes and avatars. Possibly the greatest scam in existence.
Letting cash die out will be a huge mistake in years to come. Letting banks ultimately decide is not the way forward. There are numerous disadvantages to digital that could also be crippling to the national interests.
Digital purchases also bring money into local areas, for example a local people can sell on eBay or Etsy, make money of YouTube or any other thing.
And local people probably own Amazon in their super fund.