- Joined
- 24 February 2009
- Posts
- 3
- Reactions
- 0
Mod you can delete all links and can delete all my posts or even this whole stupid thread.
Jaxon, cutz and all your other gutless lurkers you are defaming me and calling me a liar and I take offence at your accusations. Every single word on my website is true. All trades are real and can be proven. You are small and useless people who will never amount to anything.
You know what?
I'm done with you guys. What a bunch of losers. Jackson you are a moron. I'm trying to help people here and all you can do is critisize and complain like a bunch of bitter old women. You wouldn't know a genuine opportunity if it came and smashed you in the face!
I think this thread has run its course. Thread closed.Paul, grow a brain.
You know what?
I'm done with you guys. What a bunch of losers. Jackson you are a moron. I'm trying to help people here and all you can do is critisize and complain like a bunch of bitter old women. You wouldn't know a genuine opportunity if it came and smashed you in the face!
Although I'm approx. a year late...
Bill,
Perhaps you can enlighten the forum as to what your "opportunity" entails. You don't have to get too specific, just what its all about and how someone like Vicki would have done better if she "listened".
The only moral of this story is "If you pay for education - use it!"
What if the original education is sub-par?
...but I've known many educators in the last 6 years and I honestly believe that they all believe they are doing their best to provide all the information people need to get the results desired.
I've never met one that intentionally set out to mislead or harm anyone.
Oh Bill, I can't believe you believe that.
Let's cut through the cr@p here. The prime motivation of any educator is to make a profit from selling courses/mentorship. Otherwise why not do it for free via a blog etc. Plenty do that and it is my observation that the quality of education via free resources such as Adam Warner's and Bill Luby's is generally a quantum leap higher than heavily marketed courses costing $000s.
There are some expensive courses that contain quality education, but IME these are a small minority, e.g. Cottle.
We all know the vast majority of vendors are pedalling rubbish and enriching themselves at the expense of naive punters.
I can think of several straight off the top of my head eg one pedalling a particularly irritating misnomer for covered calls.
As for the misnomer, I know who you are talking about and he uses that term to help people get their heads around a previosuly difficult concept. I have no problem with analogies - I use them a lot.
Analogies are Ok so long as there is a reasonable parallel. The misnomer, and the claimed returns, are nowhere near accurate.
As far as getting people to get their head around difficult concepts, and we are talking options here, there is no substitute for a through grounding in the basics, namely understanding pricing via the Greeks.
Said educator (and others), as far as I know actively discourages this, or at best does not do anywhere near an adequate job.
Personally i dont see how anyone can charge for education unless they can provide broker statements showing a track record better than a given index
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?