Here is a quick chart of major support levels as I see them.
$24.00 (very close to current price), if that falls $20.. then $16 seem to be the next major support levels. Not so sure on $16, but $20 would seem possible in the near-term.
p.s. maybe should use a LOG scale, but anyhow, here it is..
been a few on here calling $24 as the value entry level for the big ozzie boomer for quite a while (yt included) and much merriment ensued from incredulous LT holders to those suggestions.I agree totally.
I was preparing a chart along the same lines. $23 then $16 or lower. If it goes far through $23 then its got no real support anywhere as this is the 61.8 retracement.
Thanks mate.
gg
I was reading today about predicted price weakness for BHP in the next week. I don't hold any yet. Who might see any further price weakness as a good opportunity to buy? Generally I'm probably a bit negative on the resource stocks due to their well known booms and busts. I'm aware of the China story, but am realistic enough to know that it may not last beyond 2005.
The last round of price negotiations soured the relationship between BHP and China. Knowing the business style of the Chinese, I feel BHP may have done itself some damage long term.
Who sees RIO as a better alternative BHP long term?
If BHP are to acquire RIO, isn't RIO the better buy with the ration between their SPs out of kilter with the offer?
Alan Kohler suggested this but I'm interested in ASF opinions.
Just remember though that if the t/o fails the ratio will change the other way, as there is a t/o premium in rio's price and a t/o charge to bhp's.
gg
The thing is Rick, nobody here knows.....
Now MRC, I really need you to know otherwise I have to work things out for myself..... That's a bit much to ask isn't it?
So if it fails, BHP's price will fall and RIO's price will go up? I thought it would go down, as there will be ppl buying RIO atm due to the profit they'd make if the t/o goes through...
LOL! Maybe they could do a South Park episode where Kev07 makes an appearance, that should be more entertaining for the poor BHP exec's. The South Park creators wouldnt even need to do any extra drawing or animation for Kev07, they can just use pics of the Milky Bar Kid! :
BHP should have a great day on Monday owing to an 11% increase overnight on LSE. Should do something similar and move into $27 range.
BSD
Let's examine the macro/micro fundamentals.
The questions below pertain to both.
From BHP's 2005 Annual Report;
*Petroleum +38.9%
*Aluminium +26.5%
*Base Metals [Copper, Lead, Zinc, Gold, Silver, Uranium Cathode] +221.8%
*Carbon Steel [Iron Ore, Magnesium, Metallurgical Coal] +127.8%
*Diamonds + Specialty -7.9%
*Energy Coal +206.9%
*Stainless Steel +47.7%
Are these types of increases sustainable?
This question must be addressed in two stages;
*Macro-view, viz. global supply/demand dynamics
*Balance Sheet, viz. Accounting policies.
Balance Sheet.
BHP utilizes FIFO accounting for Inventory.
FIFO, in an environment of rising prices, leverages net profit.
FIFO in an environment of stable, or falling prices, causes losses on Inventory.
Therefore, unless prices for Inventory continue to rise, net profits will fall.
Looking at the percentage increases within Inventory pricing, can you envisage further increases of a similar, or increasing magnitude?
If not, then, as prices stabilise and weaken, so FIFO will impact net earnings.
We can calculate this from the Depreciation charge.
Therefore, from a Balance Sheet analysis, we can surmise that the earnings growth could have a fatal flaw that is currently under-appreciated.
From a macro-perspective;
The US & China are symbiotic economies currently.
China can only consume 42% of their own output [this is a very small consumption]
They thus rely on the rest of the OECD bloc to take the surplus production.
The US accounts for some 68% of the 58% surplus.
Walmart alone accounts for 30% of the US 68%
Now supposing China did not cycle the FX surplus back to the US via the purchase of Treasuries? Could, would the US continue to purchase Chinese manufacturing output?
Protectionism is very strongly on the rise through Congress & Senate working parties, you need only look at various mergers that were blocked recently.
Trade tarriffs, etc are again a fact of global trade, thus, should China NOT support the US consumer, the US consumer would possibly be denied the opportunity to purchase from China just in case they would still wish to, or could afford to.
China is still a managed economy.
It is managed locally with great inefficiencies and wasted capital.
In China, it has led to massive overinvestment in manufacturing assets in sectors already suffering from oversupply. Investment in fixed assets -- everything from steel mills to cement plants to oil refineries to highways -- grew by 30% in the first half of 2006.
Although the reported profits of China's largest industrial enterprises climbed 28% in the first half of 2006 over the same period in 2005, companies in some sectors have seen profits squeezed, sometimes to the vanishing point. According to government numbers, 80% of the profits in the Chinese economy went to companies in the oil, power, coal and nonferrous metals sectors. The other 30 sectors of the economy shared just 20% of corporate profits.
Profits in the Steel sector dropped by 20% in the first half of the year. The problem is overcapacity. Too many steel companies have added too much capacity, driving down the price they can charge for their product.
Cheap money in plentiful supply has produced a real estate boom in China, too. Higher prices pull more money into real estate, of course. In the first six months of 2006, real estate investment climbed 24.2% over the same period in 2005. According to the National Bureau of Statistics, 1.41 billion square meters of housing were built from January through June 2006, up 21% from 2006.
China needs GDP growth north of 7% a year just to stay even with the number of new job seekers thrown up by its massive population every year.
A purely rational economic analysis would say that if Chinese textile makers can't compete after the yuan is appropriately revalued, then the least-efficient companies in the sector should go out of business and the jobs should flow to countries, perhaps Vietnam, where lower labor costs would allow textile makers to make a profit.
That would mean shipping jobs out of China, however, and advocating that is political death in a country that needs to create 20 million jobs a year to keep the population governable by the Communist regime.
Therefore, it would seemingly be economic suicide to dampen demand from the US via refusal to fund the deficit in trade. The second part of the equation being, how much of the infra-structure, & productive assets belong to US Corporations via their FDI investments?
Just because the profits are not being repatriated due to tax reasons, does not mean the profits are not accruing to Corporate America.
With such a large component of listed Australian stocks having their earnings seemingly dependent upon Chinese demand, how will Australia weather a recession in China?
China has huge reserves of coal.
They are switching their power generation from oil & imported coal to home produced coal. This will impact the price of coal, particularly if they become net exporters.
Iron ore, with a steel glut already, and getting worse, demand from China will decrease, again, not promising for BHP.
China is the margin economy.
Prices are always set at the margin.
The margin is currently evolving.
In the longer term, I see prices returning to the equilibrium.
So what are those prices?
From RIO's Annual Report;
Alumina
Low price $250
Current price $420
Aluminum
Low price $55
Current price $90
Coking Coal
Low Price $45
Current price $130
Thermal Coal
Low price $35
Current price $55
Copper
Low price $75
Current price $160
Diamonds
Low price $150
Current price $200
Gold
Low price $350
Current price $550
Iron Ore
Low price $35
Current price $80
Iron Pellets
Low price $45
Current price $120
Molybdenum
Low price $5
Current $30
Silver
Low price $5
Current $7
"Should prices fall to circa $8.00 then there will be enough value available to warrant an investment with “Fair Value” calculated at the range of $18.70 to $13.80 per share."
Therefore, intrinsic value is in a range between $13.50 - $18.70.
For an UNDERVALUATION I recommend buying at least 50% below this range. At $8.00, BHP would enter the undervaluation, or bargain area.
jog on
d998
Your pathetic analysis is available earlier in this thread for those interested.BHP is starting to scare some of the "longer term" holders as it's price retraces closer to intrinsic values.
The question now is, will it overshoot on the downside, as much as it overshot on the upside.
jog on
duc
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.