- Joined
- 2 May 2007
- Posts
- 4,746
- Reactions
- 3,004
I am getting conflicting information today on BHP. I heard on channel nine that BHP shares where down more than 4% in the US (I did not know they were listed there) and when I check their share price in London they went down only 0.41%. Bgi difference. I am wondering what that will mean for BHP opening today in the ASX. Probably down but will it be a lot down or just a bit
What has spooked BHP today? Is Iron ore agreement with china on its way to announcement today? Or is it the circulating rumors of deal sweetening 3.8 :1 for RIO( as appeared in bloomberg today).
I had set a target of 48.70 quite a while ago, now it seems I have to move my exit point a little higer
It's currently trading in channel... $50 looks to be the target then a pullback.... looking too risky to buy at these levels, looks like it has lost momentum and volume is extremely light
Looks like the market is not agreeing with you guya as BHP is up almost 5 % Why ????Can't explain this clearly
Rumour is that the Chinese are getting ready to purchase a stake in BHP, therefore the dramatic jump in BHP'S share price today.A few analysts have since come forward noting that volume hasnt been extravagent and that no large block purchases have been seen,basically indicating that it is still just a rumour at the moment.BHP price at 48.12 and dropping,from a high of 48.54.
scrap rumours... the biggest downfall of a trader... think of it this way, by the time it hits us, the prices is way out of reach, big guys then pound the stock off to the little guy at large prices... perfect example was the RIO rumour, stock shot to $150... big guys sold off at those levels and then price dropped to $100 over a couple months
Exactly the reason I just took out a short on BHP - haven't seen BHP run by 10%+ in a few days before without giving some back in the near future.
good call if you ask me... much more limited risk than taking a long position... I personally would have waited till a $50 touch or a confirmation of turn... but either way risk is in your favour
Why would you say this? It just moved up through an old all-time high on decent volume on a wide spread and closed near the high? I would say there would be more risk if volume did not increase (however still would have been nice to see volume higher than today).
Also, RSI is sitting around where it was in April at the $45 level, so it would have been reassuring to see RSI move higher.
I did not take the trade, just did not have confidence in this breakout and will be looking for a consolidation.
Cannot say there is less risk in taking a short.........
Date: 14/5/2008
Author: Barry FitzGerald
Source: The Age --- Page: B1
BHP Billiton agreed to pay $C284 million ($A298 million) for junior Canadianpartner Anglo Potash on 12 May 2008. The acquisition follows on from former BHPMD Chip Goodyear's "feed the world" strategy, which wasintroduced after the executive determined that rampant industrialisation inChina and India would increase global demand for food. BHP's offer valuesAnglo at a 34 per cent premium to its closing share price on 12 May
Date: 14/5/2008
Author: Andrew Trounson
Source: The Australian --- Page: 33
Mike Yeager, head of the petroleum division of BHP Billiton, has commented onits strategy in the immediate future. The Australian-listed resources group aimsto develop its offshore LNG projects in Western Australia as a priority.However, the relatively long distance from the coast of some 250 km poses achallenge, and several options are under consideration. The least favoured ofthese would be to make the Scarborough and Thebe fields part of the existingNorth West Shelf partnership, of which BHP is a member. This would mean thatdevelopment may be postponed until other fields of the alliance are ready.Yeager also says the petroleum arm's spending on exploration will rise toalmost $US1bn ($A1.1bn), from currently $US700m
Why would you say this? It just moved up through an old all-time high on decent volume on a wide spread and closed near the high? I would say there would be more risk if volume did not increase (however still would have been nice to see volume higher than today).
Also, RSI is sitting around where it was in April at the $45 level, so it would have been reassuring to see RSI move higher.
I did not take the trade, just did not have confidence in this breakout and will be looking for a consolidation.
Cannot say there is less risk in taking a short.........
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?