- Joined
- 20 July 2021
- Posts
- 11,907
- Reactions
- 16,584
there is a very high chance i will not be alive in 100 years time
and the way BHP is going it might not even turn a profit on that project in my lifetime
but maybe that is an over-looked flaw in BHP , the fixation on buying 'world-class projects ' rather than a mix of 'highly prospective projects ' and top level assets
well the GP who wrote up the case for a disability pension reckons i have a 50/50 chance of another 4 years , but then things got complicatedly ( before that pesky virus )I reckon I have 30 years left, so still time to invest in BHP I think.
BHP have been pretty clear in their strategic plan on assets to foster. Long term, through the cycles, and now 'future' metals: Iron, Copper, Nickel, Potash.
Shaving off medium projects to S32 and shunting O&G to WPG was strategically smart I think. Particularly with the potential forward ESG commitments. The amount of carbon credits those companies are going to have to buy will be astronomical to gain credit.
I suspect that the pendulum will shift back at some point and they will develop quite a significant exploration portfolio because they'll need to spent all the free cash flow they're generating.
I have no doubt their potash ash business will be profitable, it’s of a very large scale so it’s cost will be low / tonne, and it sits right above the “bread basket” of America.there is a very high chance i will not be alive in 100 years time
and the way BHP is going it might not even turn a profit on that project in my lifetime
but maybe that is an over-looked flaw in BHP , the fixation on buying 'world-class projects ' rather than a mix of 'highly prospective projects ' and top level assets
I reckon I have 30 years left, so still time to invest in BHP I think.
BHP have been pretty clear in their strategic plan on assets to foster. Long term, through the cycles, and now 'future' metals: Iron, Copper, Nickel, Potash.
Shaving off medium projects to S32 and shunting O&G to WPG was strategically smart I think. Particularly with the potential forward ESG commitments. The amount of carbon credits those companies are going to have to buy will be astronomical to gain credit.
I suspect that the pendulum will shift back at some point and they will develop quite a significant exploration portfolio because they'll need to spent all the free cash flow they're generating.
i was hoping it would contribute enough to replace the oil/gas/petroleum arm , or at least reverse the shale oil misadventure , because eventually they will also be pressured to exit coal , since activist share-holders seem to be making policies .Over all potash will only be a small business for BHP, but it’s a welcome addition to their portfolio.
but , but , i am over 65 and the life-expectancy isn't as long as it might be , i would rather a mine with a 10 year life-span making a profit now , and let the government mourn the lack of capital gains , when they settle up the estateThe benefit of owning a mine with a very long of life of say 100 years, is that you get to collect dividends from that mine for a life time, with out depleting the capital value of that mine.
Eg, a 100 year mine life means you can benefit from the dividends produced for 30 years, and after that still have a valuable asset with a 70 year life remaining, which you can then sell for a lump sum.
Where as a mine with a 10 year life will pay you dividends for 10 years, but then it’s capital value will be reduced to $0, and you can’t sell it, so a large portion of your annual dividend was actually a capital return from depleting your asset, not all profit to you.
So there is a lot of benefit to owning a mine with a long life, and you can benefit from that long mine life even if that mine life exceeds your own expected life.
Potash won’t come close to the size of the oil and gas business, but you can always just keep those WDS shares in the bottom draw and collect the dividends on them, and treat them as they are still part of the same over all portfolio.i was hoping it would contribute enough to replace the oil/gas/petroleum arm , or at least reverse the shale oil misadventure , because eventually they will also be pressured to exit coal , since activist share-holders seem to be making policies .
yes a few years back i looked at a couple of ASX listed potash stocks and came to the same conclusion , i will be looking for WES to snap up a small miner to bolt on to their chemical/explosives/fertilizer arm
i am over 65 and the life-expectancy isn't as long as it might be
no it is the heart issue that is the problem and the complication ( no shoulder reconstruction , because they are worried about the heart ) , and the various doctors seem to be happy despite the stats declining@divs4ever being 69 myself I recently remarked to my doctor that "old age has nothing going for it".
His reply was, "don't worry, it doesn't last long"
Skate.
Why are there so many old drunks and so few old doctors?@divs4ever being 69 myself I recently remarked to my doctor that "old age has nothing going for it".
His reply was, "don't worry, it doesn't last long"
Skate.
alcohol is a preservativeWhy are there so many old drunks and so few old doctors?
gg
Why are there so many old drunks and so few old doctors?
gg
yes but the minefield in front of us is future ( div. ) earningsBased on current BHP share price, it has a market capitalisation of $204.7 billion, with a trailing dividend yield of +11.86%.
Own BHP shares? Here's why the miner could be set for a $1.85 billion boost
Shares in BHP Group Ltd (ASX: BHP) have tumbled 8% in the past week. But could the BHP share price receive a much-welcomed boost?www.fool.com.au
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?