I don't want to spend more than about 8 hours per week maintaining my investments
+1. Much depends on your level of capital. e.g. if you have several million you can just be very conservative and allow interest on cash deposits to fund your cost of living. But if you need to generate the same level of income from just a few hundred thousand you're going to have to work harder for it.Hi Graeme,
I think the first question needs to be 'what return do I need to get to fund my lifestyle'... ie. Are you going to be happy leaving nothing for the kids (if you have any) at the end of the day? You may be in a position avoid investing in volatile assets such as a small companies fund.
There is an extensive thread on ASF which covers the Storm Financial story, a number of retirees with more than sufficient capital to retire comfortably were left with little due to the recommendations of Storm advisers to use leverage to 'maximise returns'
Then:
- Do you need the SMSF and associated costs/time to achieve this?
- Are you maximising an benefit you may receive from the Gov't?
Hope that helps a little!
Hi Julia
Yes, I have invested in equities at various times in the past, and have been a fixed interest investment manager in a past life - all options to investing are open to me.
I understand about lifestyle and leaving enough for the kids, and risks such as the losses at Storm etc,.. - please take that as a given.
What I'm after is that specific info about the track records about recommendations on such sites as MorningStar, or any specific mutual funds that I'm interested in (as part of my research).
I'm also looking at Berkshire Hathaway as a set and forget option.
Thanks so much
Cheers
Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger are without doubt excellent investors but I personally would not place one cent with them. No income.
Out of interest, why is income critical to you (perhaps I'm missing something)?
If you know any multis, ask them. Their highly paid advisors seem to always get them into the best funds, whether they are based here or O.S.
If you are retiring isn't income a fairly important part (the major part) of what you require from your investments? If you are not working where will your regular money be coming from?
Remember if you invest in an overseas stock you are also exposed to currency risk on top of all the other associated risks
Hi Prawn_86
I've always thought total return (as opposed to income/dividends) is what counts, because I can always sell and then immediately buy back in to cash in gains (if and when I need the cash).
Am I missing something
If you are retiring isn't income a fairly important part (the major part) of what you require from your investments? If you are not working where will your regular money be coming from?
Remember if you invest in an overseas stock you are also exposed to currency risk on top of all the other associated risks
You must be able to have surplus to keep ahead of inflation.
Most dont consider this.
You must be able to have surplus to keep ahead of inflation.
Most dont consider this.
If you retired 25 yrs ago $500K was a considerable sum.
Today it is unfortunately nothing.
If your needing 70K to live as you do now youll need around $1.2 mill at 6%
If you need less then you have a chance of lasting (Financially) 25 yrs +
If not your snaffle.
Only using your equity in your home later in life or leaving very little left will
save you--then of course if you need nursing home care----blah blah.
Getting OLD has hair on it!
Im definately rebelling.
What happens if there is a capital loss when you need to sell out?
I assume you would only sell a portion to cover your living costs each time you needed funds? If you are selling each week then you are hugely exposed to market risk and stock specific risk all without an income yield. Not to mention increased transaction fees.
If you are focusing on total return, then it is essentially broken down into shorter term trading as to when you need income (weekly or fortnightly). If you want to trade short term, managed funds are not for you, and you will need more than 8 hours a week to learn it
What you have suggested seems hugely innefficient
+1. Much depends on your level of capital. e.g. if you have several million you can just be very conservative and allow interest on cash deposits to fund your cost of living. But if you need to generate the same level of income from just a few hundred thousand you're going to have to work harder for it.
You seem to indicate that, although you have a SMSF, you don't actually have the confidence to directly invest the money and assume you will hand over to some organisation/managed fund.
As robz suggests above, do have a look at the Storm thread for an idea of what can happen when you relinquish responsibility to an organisation whose prime focus is going to be their own profitability rather than yours.
Have you had experience, either within or outside your SMSF of investing in the sharemarket?
Thanks Gringotts Bank
Pardon my ignorance: what's a multi?
Thanks
Graeme
Ok i think i'll contact some well heeled matesSomeone with a lot of money (multi-millionaire). They get all the good deals.
Bank managers, brokers and financial advisers fall over themselves trying to impress, going to great lengths to have them on their books.
I'm guessing a limitation would be that
some of these funds will be closed to plebs and those of moderate income.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?