I am not saying that no bullet hit her, I am just saying that they should have let a full post martum to determine the cause of death, rather than saying I saw 3 bullet wounds. Can you tell me the experience of her friend in seeing bullet wounds and distinguising them from pallet or lever ones?? I donot believe the story of the givernment either, but I guess some portion of blame lies with the benazir's party and her husband to not let the inquiry run its course. Can you name a murder/assination which ended without a postmartum in modern times? It is tentamount to hiding the truth and facts. I know their party will never exhume her body and this matter will remain a subject of discussion for years to come.
I think if the final statement was not hurried it would have only presented only one story and no one would have objected to that. Still I beleive the politics is more involved than telling transparently what happened. I am also surprised as to why there were no camera's pointing to the rally. Personally I think assination by a sniper story is more dramatic and enigmatic than a simple accidental death. As I said earlier, Benazir was killed and no one is denying this fact. The focus should be on capturing the culprit and stablizing the country, rather than starting a never ending balme game.
I am giving equal weitage to both of them and personally like to exhume the body to find out the truth...
Interesting observation and this kind of thinking should be applied to solve the case
Anyway her car was bullet proof ( and somewhat blast proof), if you see some of the pictures it has a shielding around sunroof as well. Plus the blast might not be perfect. I think it was not a simple lever and is there to hold the strange looking( shield around sunroof...). It might also point to the fact that the lever in her car might be a hidden james-bond style pistol and might have killed her... The person who designed that lever should also be involved in the inquiry.... The blast and shooting might be a cover up.. Mate plese tell me a simple fact. ZA bhutto's property was divided into 5 heirs ( benazir getting the least amount ), and still she is the richiest person in the family around US $1.2Billion while the rest of her family might not even be worth more than a few million US $. She must have invested into FMG to get that much rich so quickly?? Also note the UN based, oil for food program inquiry into her family business. I will doubt the Pakistan corruption charges but UN inquiry is a separate thing. Most or all the fingers point to her husband ( not her ) to all these corruption charges. And the sad truth is that out of all this mess he is the immediate beneficiary.
I am not saying Musharraf is not corrupt, his lust for power is the main problem. He wants power, he creates an illusion of alqeada in pakistan, he gets support(money and political) from Uncle sam. Benazir might have exposed that fact and would have controlled this matter much better as that was on her agenda. Musharraf has now even more ground to create a much bigger illusion of Alqeada ( even if it does not exist he has to say it exists). The worst part is no one exactly know anything about alqeada. It acts like a franchise, with minimum control of centre. It is the best form of organization to blame something, which mush is conviently doing.
If musharraf goes and a transperant governtment comes in, it might stablize the situation. But if musharraf clings to power a bit longer, it will create more chaos, something alqeda thrieves upon.
PS. I am just pointing out the facts that in Pakistan, every move is politically motivated ( either govt. or bhutto's party) and should be throughly investigated before forming an opinion. Yes govt. seems right now to cover up her death and shift the blame, but bhutto's family has not helped either to ascertain the facts.
