This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

BDG - Bendigo Mining

nizar said:
Exactly, when will people learn
My advice has always been...BUY A PRODUCER...not someone said its gonnabe....thats why I buy only...if I know 100% thats is going to happen...I wont say who...that is the difference between a good share and a gonnabe share...good luck to all...they have $95million in the bank...hope it will work for the shareholders.....
 
So basically this company downgraded its status into an explorer and it could take up to 2 years exploring?
I didn't realise this until I bought it.
Should've paid more attention to the news.
Omg...a lot of people buying from the early stage would've thought of shooting this company.
 
PhoenixXx said:
Omg...a lot of people buying from the early stage would've thought of shooting this company.

Well maybe not shooting, as that's is now illegal, but perhaps suing first, then ........ maybe.
 
This will be back to $1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Next time they do a consolidation!

So these shares are now effectively 3c from when I first looked at them, down 90% (was 30c then) from the then highs. Not a great performance in a gold bull market.

Maybe Harmony who've had experience in underground mining knew something even back then.

This is starting to look like the son of Rus the old Pasminco dog?
Anyone remember him?


Sorry for holders who have been burnt , I know I'd be very upset with the announcements after 1month of a SPP.
ASIC should be looking at this
 
Had a shot at daytrading this one. Went long at 34.5 and watched it go up.... then down! Instead of taking a loss hit sell for 3x amount and shorted at 33c, filled at 30c.

A lot of fun and finished in front this time.

Cheers all,

hector
 

Early stage?

It wasnt that long ago when the BDG graph looked like HEAVEN - higher highs, higher lows, strong uptrend. $1 to $2.50 in a few months.
 

I didn't hold this but I don't know that thats fair comment to anyone that did - this looked like a producer about to start production. They had a probable ore reserve - this is supposed to be a high level of confidence estimate under the JORC code and a very reliable figure. They had also started actual mining.

Clearly someone has stuffed up badly by putting a cruddy JORC estimate together which makes all of their figures look shaky. Comments like we'll convert from inferred resource to gold bars rather than to indicated or measured reek of very poor management - how can you plan capital expenditure when you don't know how much you've got and what the profit will be. It sounds like they just assumed that if they start mining they'll uncover enough to be able to keep going for quite a while, rather than doing some proper measurement prior to commencement.

Using your logic above, AGM, a stock you favour, is also not a done deal - who's to know whether their Nickel estimates will hold up - who's to know they'll get their equipment commissioned and working in the timeframes they've predicted etc.
 
Re your last statements...SORRY....AGM has A HUGE deposit in them hills in Tasmania..better believe it..it will all happen...all sold to CHINA for the next 15years.....Better do some research before posting my friend... You should know that I DO MY RESEARCH..funny that....but I do....LOLOLOLO
 
this is true!
 
Originally Posted by nizar
......

We are in a bullmarket, its not as if we are in shortage of winners, so try to buy stocks at all time highs, please, instead of catching the ones at all time lows, and then we can all make money and be happy

Dr Doom said:
nizar, not sure that's a winning formula either, same risks at all time highs as lows eg picking tops & bottoms. No skill in being lemming, but they all eventually drop of a cliff
William Eckhardt used this method. As long as you have a tight stop loss, you should theoretically be able to catch stocks on a breakout etc. while they run, rather than having to pick a top or bottom, or waiting for a correction that may never happen.
 
Luckily, I wanted to buy but stayed out. My broker is suggesting it will go to the wall
 
not in the next 6 months anyway - plenty of cash from the recent placement at 80c to institutions ...
 
cuttlefish said:
not in the next 6 months anyway - plenty of cash from the recent placement at 80c to institutions ...

I wonder if the CEO and the GM will go into "protective custody" .... There must be some seriously disgruntled "big players" out there!

My sincere best wishes to any holders who are sitting on big losses here .......... I know how it feels to get hit by the big "slammer" (trading halt followed by a 50% ish SP drop ............... ) If it were me in this position (again) I would buy more, set a tightish stop loss, and hope to hell it rebounds sooner than later.
In two years from now who knows where the SP on this might end up ............ patience will be the key I think ........... time will tell .......
 
I have just started trading, bought my 1st share today .. stated in another thread

Have tried to learn from the experts around here who espouse various trading styles and have come up with my own trading method.

One requirement is to look at charts, I ignore basically everything, MA's stots macads etc etc .. the only thing I look at is the price direction (I will be forever gratefull to Tech/A) and volume.

Looking at the BDG chart for the last 4 months (the period of interest to me)
all it seems to have done is gone down, down, down ... I could not see a single entry point for my method.

I just don't understand why anybody would want to invest in this???

I guess when I learn more and experience my 1st loss I may understand why anyone would want to buy a declining stock.

I hope it recovers for those sitting on losses.

Rob
 
I must admit that last years share placement looks really, really convenient.
If this stock was traded on the NYSE NASDAQ or OTCBB this would never have happened. The board would have been nailed for sure IMHO. Have we learnt nothing from the Sons of Gwalia debacle? The story is the same - questionable reserves. Only significant difference is the SGW forward contracts but the same story essentially
IMHO opinion there is something VERY smelly about this whole saga.
I bought in at $1.45 sold at .74 last Thursday (!) bought in again at .295.
Over the years I have trade this stock for some handy profits so I am not much in the red but I really do feel for people who bought recently.
With the RIGHT MANAGEMENT and the RIGHT GEOSCIENCE team this is a good story IMHO. :behead:
 
Mate you SHOULD do some research before POSTING....Sons of Gwalia...had a HEDGE problem..NOT A RESERVE problem my friend thats what killed the company...see SBM its All there in black and white....as far as BDG....they have VERY little gold indeed whereby...the Sons of Gwalia reserves are indeed proving to be so...do your research first as what you posted is incorect.....
 

Hi Barney,

This companies charts say it all, and ann confirm it.

I feel buying more of a bad thing wouldn't make it a good thing, esp if gamble goes into another trading halt (more negative things have been happening with this company) and then gaps down further, not triggering the stop loss.

Why not use that money into so many other shares today trending up, and positive anns..... and possibly blue skies.

I mean it wouldn't matter where you made the money to offset your losses in bdg, except in another stock where chart and anns were knownly bad.

EDIT: In 2 years from now the company could be run down further...????

On the other hand, there could be a small bounce today, esp because this could be seen as a double botton from feb 93, just b4 the share soared to all time highs. (pointed out by good friend)

Anyway Good Luck Guys.
SevenFX
 
SevenFX said:
Why not use that money into so many other shares today trending up, and positive anns..... and possibly blue skies.

EDIT: In 2 years from now the company could be run down further...????

On the other hand, there could be a small bounce today
Good points Tek, but I think it will be hard for old time holders to let go psychologically, as is seen in this thread already. On the other hand, your second point above could be valid too. The market normally under and overshoots. (not sure about this been like a double bottom though) All the best.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...