- Joined
- 31 May 2006
- Posts
- 1,941
- Reactions
- 2
Thanks for the explanation, Jim. That's how I understood page 9 of the document:ASX release. Obviously your client wouldn't want to have his deals voided and explains the effort he has undertaken to ensure, to the best of his knowledge, that his purchases will hold.
Which means that any party who has sold BCSCA off market, for any price, to an identity who is neither bankrupt nor fraudulent has therefore been able to divest themselves of the instalment liability, even if it was done to avoid paying the instalment. Sounds good to me! And what I expected.
It also means that this warning by BCSCA was wrong:
By memory, I believe BCS has warned that any off market transfers for the purpose of avoiding the debt can be overturned.
You can also bet that BCSCA have a disclaimer which says "Seek your own independent financial advice before acting on this information"So presumably it could follow that if someone has acted on the advice of BCSA and held onto their shares when they could have sold them off market, this might be grounds to refuse paying the next installment. That will be an interesting one for the lawyers to argue.
From the latest article:
"If BrisConnections were to be wound up, unit holders would lose their ability to trade their units or accept any potential offer for their units," Nick Lattimore said on Boardroom Radio Australia yesterday.
------------
" Beware of wolves in sheeps clothing " ???/ As always do your own research.:
Cant seem to post links very well...but try this www.smh.com.au August 14th 2007 heading "Judge notes a calmer......."
And plot thickens....:Courier Mail Saturday
"But behind the scenes, BrisConnections chairman Trevor Rowe had a number of negotiations with Bolton.
Rowe's suggestion was to reinstate the dividend and defer the $1 instalment due in April. That would have seen Bolton pocket $4.5 million for his investment - and perhaps, if the April instalment was deferred, let him sell out before bigger liabilities kicked in.
Could this have been a high-risk greenmail attempt - that has put a $4.8 billion project at risk? "
Yes...I Agree.....if drowning you might hold onto any lifeline...but not the one that pushed you in.......
In the words of Justice Robson, these are people in "a very difficult situation" due to the very entity — BrisConnections — that is supposed to be representing their interests.
Hugh McLernon, managing director of litigation funding firm IMF Australia, has agreed to pay for a senior counsel to represent several unit holders in the matter next week.
IMF successfully bankrolled a class action against Sons of Gwalia in 2003, and has recently been involved in litigation surrounding Opes Prime and Firepower Australia...
A further interview with an accountant representing investor couple on the ABC's "The National Interest".
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/nationalinterest/stories/2009/2528356.htm
A further interview with an accountant representing investor couple on the ABC's "The National Interest".
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/nationalinterest/stories/2009/2528356.htm
"Question to financial experts?
As mention in discussion : "Tool Road operator invested into financial derivatives and lost few hundred millions in process.."
1- Underwriters are covering loss?
2-Unsophisticated investors (mums and dads) covering ? "
Balance Sheet of BCS takes the hit, so ultimately, equity holders (ie. 80% M&D's) cover/take those lossses.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?