Prospector
Not a scaredy cat anymore
- Joined
- 18 January 2006
- Posts
- 2,594
- Reactions
- 2
Justice Robson said the toll-road builder had failed to provide the court evidence of whether unit holders would be better off if they were forced to pay the instalments due next month.
I think the rebel's bid failed bit was a reference to Bolton's attempt to get Macquarie's new action heard as part of this case instead of as a separate case next week.
The letter was posted for interest........do your own research
http//www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,25217568-36418,00.html
Cant get that link happening Cats. Can you precis?
What is the latest date one can sell?
By memory, I believe BCS has warned that any off market transfers for the purpose of avoiding the debt can be overturned.
But there are no on-market buyers, that is the problem.But if purchased/sold on market I assume there would be no problem?
If my quick math is correct, it would cost ~78K to buy 20% on market.
I understand it would cost a little bit more but wouldn't it prevent any legal challenges? Cheaper than lawyers I would have thought.
By memory, I believe BCS has warned that any off market transfers for the purpose of avoiding the debt can be overturned.
By memory, I believe BCS has warned that any off market transfers for the purpose of avoiding the debt can be overturned.
...Anyway, on page 9 of the ASX release it states the circumstances where off-market transfers can be voidable. Then in the next paragraph it gives the circumstances under which the transaction will not be regarded as voidable....
I would have thought that in the situation being discussed above it would be deemed an arms length transaction - no relationship or previous association between buyer and seller - so its hard to see how it could be challenged. (but I'm not a lawyer don't take my word blah blah blah).
Also BCS make a lot of statements but they are just a company expressing an opinion, they are not the law makers or the judiciary so anything they say is also challengable and arguably opinion and not necessarily fact.
But there are no on-market buyers, that is the problem.
This is where I got it from: ASX release
And above is part of the post where I discussed the wording in the document...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?