- Joined
- 13 June 2007
- Posts
- 1,203
- Reactions
- 2
I recall the Sydney Harbour Bridge (excluding Tunnel) was about 300,000 cars a day.
5 days a week = 1.5 million cars...actual figures(795,000)
52 weeks a year = 78 million cars.(41.34m)
10 years = 780 million cars.(413.40m)
Not far from your 1b figure.(long way from a bil,so using these figures as a guide i predict the brisbane project will not break even in 20 years)
That doesn't even count the weekends, which although nothing like 300,000 a day, would add something. I have no idea how long they have the tolling rights for, but 20 years, and they stand to make a nice tidy profit.
I would imagine Sydney has far greater traffic than Brisbane.
Shine, I too am another scared investor. I am unsure how to proceed other than getting my own legal advice, which does not appear to look promising.
Any suggestions or others in the same boat? If you don't want to post anything, PM me instead.
In the article it says that unit holders would still be required to make the payment even if the trust was round up???
But if they sell their units to this guy then, they are no longer unit holders???
In the article it says that unit holders would still be required to make the payment even if the trust was round up???
But if they sell their units to this guy then, they are no longer unit holders???
Well that is Trevor Rowe's contention. Of course this may be accurate depending upon how heavily the first installment has been geared and what the conditions of the lending agreement are.
EG 330 Million *3 DOES NOT EQUAL 4.8 BILLION dollars. So a significant level of gearing has to occur. Depending upon what the lending agreement between Brisconnections and the consortium of banks that are being used to fund the difference is, will determine what level of exposure the current shareholders have. There is a question however whether this lending agreement can be challenged becuase I assume that Nick Bolton's lawyers would have told him that already, and they must think it has a chance.
Remember what I said a long time ago however - These infrastructure plays are designed to get to the end of construction with a small pool of money left over to tide them over until traffic on the road ramps up and they start getting revenue. If the company is spending large amounts of money defending itself against actions, that makes the pool that much smaller (and eventually the whole proposition untenable). Bolton may merely be attempting to bury the company in court actions - (Because the management cannot continue to run the business if they know it will run at a loss).
He's not offering to Buy your shares...he just wants your vote.
Sir O
Bolton's private company Australian Style Investments Pty Ltd is a substantial unit holder in BrisConnections, with a 12.28% stake (47,923,166 units). He is now liable to pay $94 million as a result of his punt.
I assume that Bolton's private company has limited liability and would be wound up before parting with the $94 million.
''BrisConnections is very concerned that unit holders may misunderstand the impact of a winding up on the liability of unit holders,'' Rowe said.
If that is the case I don't fancy his chances.the guy with 12% could be calling their bluff with intentions to sell them back(to briscon) at a monster profit.sounds like a mexican stand off to me.
If that is the case I don't fancy his chances.
About 20% of the company is currently on the block for $0.001.
A little bit of background.
I am a young man, early 20's with no dependents or financial liabilities. I have about 30,000 saved up in cash and share investments. I have no holding company structure though.
What would be the possible ramifications of splashing some cash on a decent stake in Brisconnections? Looking at the market depth now there are 79million shares for sale at 0.01c, and i assume more could be obtained at that price.
The risks of the venture are no doubt colossal but what is the potential for profit on the upside? Including banding together with other minority retail holders (eg Mr Bolton) and trying to put the squeeze on MQC and the company.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?