- Joined
- 14 October 2008
- Posts
- 201
- Reactions
- 0
And this guy is a director of ASX, as well as chairman of Queensland Investment Corporation, an AM too. Talking about irony.
I posted a response in this thread last night ... I'm sure I submitted it and saw it on the thread after submitting. Not sure what happened to it.
When I'm less busy I guess I'll try to post it again.
Well if you were to write and complain about this to someone - who would it be ASIC? The ASX? Your local member? The shareholders association?
I think someone should be taking this on.
the best hope of getting out of this mess is to rally all others who have been "surprised" by their investment in this stock. band together and take action together.
hello rocket,
sorry that you are in this situation, it sounds very unpleasant.
really, the best hope of getting out of this mess is to rally all others who have been "surprised" by their investment in this stock. band together and take action together.
there is less chance of success, i think, as an individual, because i think u will find the onus is on you to fully inform yourself when u enter the market place -- the additional letters might be the only legal requirement at pnt of sale.
however, if there are enough of you, unified as a group, the powers that be, may decide that the additional letters are not a satisfactory means of informing the buyer.
one question, how are you coping personally regarding this mess?
james
Brisconnections are very adament they have a binding contract that cant be broken...I have put in a dispute with the financial ombudsmen, and Stuart Wilson from the shareholders association is very good and doing everything he can.
I use netwealth Share Trading as my on-line broker and their Security Details page for BCSCA indicates:
Quote
Issuer Name BRISCONNECTIONS UNIT TRUSTS
Security Description STAPLED SECURITY PAID TO $1.00, $2.00 UNPAID
Unquote
I'm a bit surprised that CommSec doesn't have this indication somewhere on their website.
PS. Maybe you have some sort of a case against CommSec for not providing all relevant information to their clients. After all, what are you paying brokerage to them for?
I could be wrong, but I think you'll find that Comsec have no responsibility in this instance. They are just the middle man offering a service between the two clients.
I have a "fledgling" legal eagle in the family ... I'll ask their opinion tonight.
I think you are correct, they have stated that have no responsibility. From what I have been hearing I am stitched up completely from all angles. I think we can all acknowledge that this is just plain wrong, but unfortunately I am not in the right...Go figure....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?