There was another thread about this I started recently.
The long and the short of it was that 5 letter shares always have money owing on them, so just be careful buying anything with 5 letters?
Options are also five letter codes; with options if things go pear shaped, you just let them lapse; in the case of instalments, you either have to sell them (if you can!) or you are fully liable to pay them out, you cannot let them lapse.
However, if wanting to trade options or warrants, you have to get special trading approvals with your broker stating that you have at least read the relevant ASX booklets which goes through all the different types of warrants & options available and explains any obligations..
Nope, when I bought FMSOA I did nothing different to any other share trade. Through online trading, which is where most people trade shares these days. One of the pitfalls I guess.
Just a quick question
Will this involve the holders having to get rid of all their personal assets to try and meet these legal obligations?
Just a quick question
Will this involve the holders having to get rid of all their personal assets to try and meet these legal obligations?
If they are the registered holders of the warrants when the installment falls due, then as I understand it they are legally obliged to pay the installment.
So by not paying they would have a legally enforceable debt and can be pursued through the courts for the full amount. If they fail to pay I assume the next step is asset seizures and bankruptcy.
Now, given that buying just $500 worth of these at the recent .001 price effectively creates a $500,000 obligation when the first installment is due, its pretty likely that the majority of people that purchased these recently would face extreme financial hardship under that scenario.
Well Mazza think of it this way...
The underwriters are Macquarie Bank and Deutche Bank. Aren't those two companies really well known for their generous and forgiving natures?
OK jokes aside I saw it stated somewhere that the underwriters will pursue payment from shareholders.
BCS Chairman Rowe actually misled the public. I remember within the first few days of listing, when BCSCA was trading below 50c, Rowe told AFR that BCS was great value because dividend yield had went up from 14% to 28%. Clearly, the denominator he used was $1, not $3. Was he really that dumb or just being irresponsible?Brisconnect CEO claims that it fully disclosed the installments in the PDS, their website, etc and everyone 'should' have been fully informed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?