This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Australian Politics General...

Why does government funding equate with perceived or real bias?
Organisations surround themselves with people who think like they do.
You will get the occasional maverick, but in the main the group think is reinforced.
Its the same reason that the murdoch press surrounds themselves with mostly conservative thinkers.
Mick
 

Well in that case you would think that a Conservative government that has been in for nearly a decade would have moulded the ABC to its own image, by appointing executives that thought like they do.

They appointed one of their own in Mark Scott but it didn't seem to make much difference.
 
Sort of.

He will fight hard for the Conservatives until it's obvious that they are going to lose, then he'll switch sides and pretend he's the people's friend.

What date was the election....
 
Which election, that report is three years old.
Mick
I remember it was before the last election. One of the Guardians of the Corporatocracy tried to program Bill Shorten who promptly told him to get stuffed
 
Stacking the board full of lib stooges

 
Gladys did not muck around in getting a nice high paying job in the private sector after her unfortunate departure from NSW Politics.
From OPTUS
I thought there was some rule about pollies not aking private sector jobs until a 12 months had passed since their demise..
No wonder she declined a job offer from Scomo.
This one pays a lot more, is less stressful, she won't have people prying into her love life, and there is every possibility it will last a little longer.
Mick
 

Sounds like a bs job to me.
 
Yes, but seems the norm these days, Julia Gillard, Bob Carr and quite a few on the Libs have all got cushy jobs soon after.

It seems a bit 'courageous' of Optus to give her a job before the Commission releases it's report.

An adverse finding for Gladys could be embarrassing for Optus.
 
It seems a bit 'courageous' of Optus to give her a job before the Commission releases it's report.

An adverse finding for Gladys could be embarrassing for Optus.
Optus is basically a Chinese owned firm these days.
 

Copied from that facey thingy


THE STORY OF THE ANT AND THE GRASSHOPPER​


The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed.


The shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others less fortunate like him are cold and starving. The ABC and Channel 9 show up to provide live coverage of the shivering grasshopper, with cuts to a video of the ant in his comfortable warm home with a table filled with food.


Australians are stunned that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so while others have plenty. The Democrats, the Greens and the Coalition Against Poverty demonstrate in front of the ant's house.


The ABC, interrupting an Aboriginal cultural festival special from North Queensland with breaking news, broadcasts them singing "We Shall Overcome".


The Green's rant that the ant has gotten rich off the backs of grasshoppers, and calls for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his "fair share".


In response to polls, the Liberal Government drafts the Economic Equity and Grasshopper Anti-Discrimination Act, retrospective to the beginning of the summer. It is quickly passed in to law.


The ant's taxes are reassessed and he is also fined for failing to hire grass hoppers as helpers. Without enough money to pay both the fine and his newly imposed retrospective taxes, his home is confiscated by the government.


The ant moves to Bali, and starts a successful restaurant.


The TV stations later show the now fat grasshopper finishing up the last of the ant's food though Spring is still months away, while the government owned house he is in, which just happens to be the ant's old house crumbles around him because he hadn't maintained it.


Inadequate government funding is blamed, Kevin Rudd is appointed to head a special inquiry that will cost $10,000,000. The grasshopper is soon dead of a drug overdose, the Sydney Morning Herald blames it on obvious failure of government to address the root causes of despair arising from social inequity.


The abandoned house is taken over by a gang of immigrant spiders, praised by the government for enriching Australia's multicultural diversity, who promptly terrorise the community.
 
Actually it's owned by Singtel, the Singaporean telecom, which is owned by the Singapore government.
I used to own this company as Singtel and from memory Singapore mostly sold it to China and took it off the ASX. Have you got any info? Interested. I could look over the old thread.
 
I used to own this company as Singtel and from memory Singapore mostly sold it to China and took it off the ASX. Have you got any info? Interested. I could look over the old thread.
I'm only going by Wikipedia which says..

Singtel controls significant market share in Australia and Singapore, with 82% of the fixed-line market, 47% of the mobile market and 43% of the broadband market in Singapore.[9] Singtel is also the second-largest company by market capitalisation listed on the Singapore Exchange[10] and is majority owned by Temasek Holdings, the investment arm of the Singapore government. Singtel is an active investor in innovation companies through its Singtel Innov8 subsidiary, founded in 2011 with S$200 million start up capital.

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...