This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Australian Bankruptcies

firstly in 30 years gas demand might be falling off a cliff or already dead.

But, We have Beetaloo being connected to the grid soon too, and more will be discovered in Queensland, PNG is also possible in the future.

its a bit like how in 1995 my science text book said we had 30 years of oil left, now 29 years later we have 30 years of oil left.
 
But, We have Beetaloo being connected to the grid soon too, and more will be discovered in Queensland, PNG is also possible in the future.
The key however, noting the thread is bankruptcies not geology, is the ability to get this tied down contractually.

A company that wants to build new industrial plant is looking to secure firm contracts for key inputs before committing. So they need someone to be willing to sign contracts to supply gas (as well as other things of course).

That's where it's coming unstuck and leading to industry either not establishing or shutting down existing production, that's the point I'm responding to here. Company XYZ tries to get a new gas contract, either for new or existing plant, and comes back either with no offers at all or with offers that are uncompetitive internationally on price. It's a well known problem in the industry, and one the ACCC has released some information about publicly.

A practical example of all this is the Gibson Island (Brisbane) fertilizer plant. It closed directly as a result of Incitec Pivot being unable to obtain a suitably priced supply of natural gas. That's a direct example of the issue here, and it certainly isn't the only one. The proposed conversion of that facility to hydrogen from electrolysis is also running into some difficulties with energy, in this case electricity, pricing as has been publicly acknowledged. So two paths to the same end and both running into essentially the same problem.

The geology etc is really just background as to how we got to that point.
 
Geez you blokes, take it to one of the 8,000 threads about gas and energy.
This is the bankruptcies thread.
And sticking to the topic, was talking to a person in the building game who has not been paid by Fletchers Building group.
He is saying the word on the street is they are in deep dodo.
Mick
 
well there is a meeting tomorrow ( at FBU ) and there might be some big news ( will it be better than expected , or worse )

i guess we will find out Wednesday when they post the results
 
I worked for a drilling company that was exploration drilling for coal at the time, the gas is everywhere where you find coal. The crew that I worked with didn't cap a few boreholes on the job before and the gas killed all the farmer's cows. Even when you're drilling you sometimes hit big pockets of gas, other times it takes a while for it to seep into the drill holes a few days later. It does screw up the water tables, so not too good if you want to farm nearby and need an underground water source.
 
Poor sentiment from consumers facing the worst cost of living crisis in decades is putting businesses under pressure and the value of orders are tumbling to a record low.

From the Evil Murdoch press
 
I feel there are many non-viable small businesses which are around due to unemployment (or lack of adequately paid employment). Certain people that cannot get a job or cannot get a decently paid job decide to risk it and start a small business where they are out of their depth and then they fail.

I feel if we kept a strong job market we would see less of these non-viable small businesses being started. The way in Australia to get a stronger job market with lower unemployment and higher wages would be keeping a lid on immigration (it just pushes down wages and pushes up unemployment) as well as incentivizing business investment.

For example in terms of incentivizing business investment:
KPMG:
"In Estonia, corporate income tax is not levied when profit is earned but when it is distributed. In 2021, the standard tax rate is 20% (calculated as 20/80 of the net distribution)."
But unfortunately some low IQ politicians in Estonia will change (worsen) the corporate tax laws in Estonia with changes to take effect from 2025.
 
When I see some of the brilliant policies in smaller countries like Estonia or El Salvador I shake my head at the collection of low IQ policies present in Australia, whether it is regarding immigration or tax, or crypto currency regulation or a range of other factors we really are incredibly woefully managed in Australia. And over time the direction of policy in Australia seems to get dumber and dumber. Like the 2023 changes to franking credits in Australia.
 
Another Builder going to builders heaven
From Evil Muroch Press
Mick
 
I look at it slightly differently, in a country as vast as Australia, I don’t see a larger population as being a cause of unemployment, I see a lack of capital being invested in ways that generate employment as being the problem.

I mean in 1992 we had an unemployment rate nearly 3 times higher, but we had 10 million less people.

Not to mention that there is places like California that are a fraction of the size of Australia, but have a population much larger than Australia, yet have quite low unemployment.

——————————————
the question is “Has Australia reached its peak of possible economic and business development?” Eg can no more farms, factories, tourism developments, service businesses, etc etc be formed to absorb labour.

I believe we are no where near our peak, we could possibly fit another 10 Sydney’s at least. So until that happens it’s not an over supply of labour that is the issue, it’s an under supply of effective capital. And possibly an under supply of skilled labour.
 
The end scene/speech from other peoples money. It points out the benefits of realising your company is dead before your company is broke.

 
Your argument is fallacious because labour supply is only half the story affecting unemployment. The other factor is demand for labour. Obviously demand for labour increases over time in a growing economy, but my point is that all things being equal unemployment would be lower than what it is now if stopped the migration and work and holiday visas etc. We saw that during the COVID period after the lockdowns ended but before they reopened the border. That was a golden period were unemployment was rapidly dropping. Sure if unemployment gets to 1% and companies literally cannot find people to work then start importing labour but we are not at that point. We have a vast labour surplus.

I have already refuted your argument in another thread that there is an under supply of skilled labour at least when you look at any industry categories in aggregate none of them have wages increasing faster than inflation therefore by definition no undersupply. Are there a small number of professions that are under-supplied? Yes of course, but in no way is it a systemic issue. The systemic issue we are facing is labour overupply.

Sure if you increase demand for labour by creating a business/investment friendly environment and then unemployment gets to rock bottom levels of 1 or 2% then sure you can think about importing some labour. But at the moment all we are doing is increasing the supply of labour without doing much to increase demand hence unemployment continues to rise.

I agree with you that lack of capital invested is the problem but my point is that importing labour only exacerbates the problem. For the current amount of capital invested in the country we are oversupplied with labour. If more capital gets invested and unemployment drops precipitously your argument would have some validity. But at this point in time it does not.
 
Demand for labour increases as more capital is invested, that was my point. But you also need a certain amount of skilled labour, hence why we need to import some labour. There is a limit to how much capital you can deploy without the skills to build or run it.

With our local birth rate, we have an aging and shrinking working population.

Did you know the average age of farmers in Australia is 63, in 1990 it was 53.

—————————
 
Last edited:
In My view, we have enough Barristas, Uber Drivers, Truck Drivers, Cleaners, Trolley Collectors and Pizza Delivery drivers.
A host of these people have degrees not recognized in Australia, which means they can't fill the spots needed
Like Doctors, Nurses, Engineers, Vets, Vet Nurses, Management roles. Middle management roles. etc etc,

Quality NOT quantity.
 
In My view, we have enough Barristas, Uber Drivers, Truck Drivers, Cleaners, Trolley Collectors and Pizza Delivery drivers.
Do we though?

In my area heaps of hospitality businesses have signs up saying they are looking for staff. The local pizza shop is looking for drivers too.

there is also a truck driver shortage and a shortage of cleaners.


Labour shortages hit hospitality






 
everyone should do a paper round when young.
It worked for me, it funded my first 100 CBA shares, all the way back in 1996, those shares with reinvested dividends are worth over $65,000 today.

I still have the original Pass book showing the day I closed the old passbook account and purchased the shares. before that I had invested in term deposits, but this cba purchase sent me on my way .

 
Maybe normal people can't afford to live in your area, therefore low paying work that you mentioned, couldn't attract the workers required.
The businesses should advertise at the nearest university, there will be plenty of graduates looking for work.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...