- Joined
- 21 December 2008
- Posts
- 4,532
- Reactions
- 1
"
If they are genuinely seeking asylum, fleeing persecution and are willing to travel half way around the world and take unbelievable risks to maybe one day be "Australian" how can we deny these people a "fair go"......?
"THIRTY-FOUR suspected asylum-seekers injured in an explosion aboard their boat off the Western Australian northwest coast will be taken to Australian hospitals for treatment."
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25341744-421,00.html
If they are genuinely seeking asylum, fleeing persecution and are willing to travel half way around the world and take unbelievable risks to maybe one day be "Australian" how can we deny these people a "fair go"......?
"THIRTY-FOUR suspected asylum-seekers injured in an explosion aboard their boat off the Western Australian northwest coast will be taken to Australian hospitals for treatment."
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25341744-421,00.html
If they are genuinely seeking asylum, fleeing persecution and are willing to travel half way around the world and take unbelievable risks to maybe one day be "Australian" how can we deny these people a "fair go"......?
Why should these people get a fair go? They are jumping the queue ahead a people just as deserving who are going through the proper channels. So the labor party ridiculed the Coalition government policy on border control for years but so far I see Krudds approach as a total disaster i.e increases in boat numbers reaching our shores with all the inherent risks to the alleged refugees and to our own Navy personnel and then kicking out Aussies out of hospital beds (Broome)to make way for these people and the smugglers make a nice profit also and the best the government can do is put the minister on TV and say we are talking to Indonesia to change their laws what a joke
I think if you did you would get a standing ovation from the crowd here.I suppose suggesting that we blow them outta the water when they enter our territorys would be deemed as inapropriate?
"THIRTY-FOUR suspected asylum-seekers injured in an explosion aboard their boat off the Western Australian northwest coast will be taken to Australian hospitals for treatment."
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25341744-421,00.html
If they are genuinely seeking asylum, fleeing persecution and are willing to travel half way around the world and take unbelievable risks to maybe one day be "Australian" how can we deny these people a "fair go"......?
I think if you did you would get a standing ovation from the crowd here.
May you all never face situations so dire that you spend all you have and risk the life of yourself and your family to escape.
Derty,
If the situation was that dire perhaps they would of escaped to a nearby country not one thousands of kms away. They head here as we are a soft target and a preferred place to live not the next safest port of refuge.
AFAIK Afghanistan is a land locked country, so they have crossed borders to get here.
cheers
Surly
Looks like children overboard again, only its real this time.
If it was up to the screaming left they would just throw open the doors and soon we would have 100's of thousands of these social refugees flooding into the country. You only have to look at the UK to see how things have turned out after unchecked immigration.
Well, if they did indeed sabotage their vessel (and we don't actually know that yet, to be politically correct), they seem to have rather got it wrong, don't they, considering three are dead, two missing, and many so seriously injured that they are unlikely to survive. And amongst those who will survive serious burns, they are pretty unlikely to recover to the extent they can enjoy a life in our oh so hospitable country.And this is not the first time that the boat people have set their boats alight.. It's what they do. As soon as they see a Warrie on the horizon they go about disabling their vessel, often they hole it so it begins to sink, sometimes they torch the engine room. Maritime law dictates that they must be assisted/rescued.
Well, if they did indeed sabotage their vessel (and we don't actually know that yet, to be politically correct), they seem to have rather got it wrong, don't they, considering three are dead, two missing, and many so seriously injured that they are unlikely to survive. And amongst those who will survive serious burns, they are pretty unlikely to recover to the extent they can enjoy a life in our oh so hospitable country.
then there is the fact that some of our own Navy personnel have been injured in the course of doing their duty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?